From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-f178.google.com (mail-qk0-f178.google.com [209.85.220.178]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411F64A59 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 14:53:18 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-qk0-f178.google.com with SMTP id t184so37031394qkd.0 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 05:53:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=semihalf-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=eTjHM1wxGsupNwkRGXtLtjm2RgglQ2Gu4LJwFJAy++M=; b=d4WlzUP+7yrqey/6hvgftutt6eF0vdmrRpDXtFGZQ0BqhATr2Y0mPQX65TNfgA/r7n blcVBeSNUUXd68stc67ZiGIhtmfQhMe7d26fSO/pJCtRA7sLuayQjGQZixsUogCi7kMz blggif9UO5svpYFtBPvojHQD/pur9OcKFw6jdhWU9rewnpGeq0/gZOdZ9XlufAjX2Bpz Cq+hZUEf+IWckmDQQkUmNaVAlYX99qq9ssoUsaf9+i+Z+sJ3Yx8jtEbKYLXHQD1TLVtm 8N47gi6l5+SQgJdX8aB5+ehaE3WWydbTBiC35sryNYvb74PjxwgiQSW/MgFGdb6y212Z 8Jjw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=eTjHM1wxGsupNwkRGXtLtjm2RgglQ2Gu4LJwFJAy++M=; b=mhdGtSHy+/pEGFRhhyLQie83hshQLa/L+T1EaKBah1CkpmdinUZ6+6QZPSBDlJC5E2 l9lXzY5/qMqnbnDip1jC2mbnEVM/88XZL6hFYAttnJF2a9/KH0SsmHuwiNmU09X6WylI AZQfy+snH2TI4LPzFENlUF7Ml7IRv8gxTOMa3eJeSeRQYQTiGcUPhASreQ2fUtq7wYlI F9ool8uob36Quv6k4sYDTp4v6yikfEZPSsytALh7OKDAg4Unj73xTFsxt5c858rF8Txp 1vA2igfrFGkMCTyLsW2VeqEYVU7y8OH1hShOQhsZw7tp+AjmE5o/Pkok+LjPYC3jZFoL HJog== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJqpSlIJTsDgH8jFlMmA7EbmdXAY2QDihWmse+UslnJlhq2AQxb1qMagqYLankC7UkJ4FZqMfilckoKyw== X-Received: by 10.55.68.80 with SMTP id r77mr3184565qka.318.1481896397529; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 05:53:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.147.70 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 05:53:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772583F0F039A@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1477486575-25148-1-git-send-email-tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com> <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772583F0E2444@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> <3517413.XL3bTbAyaC@xps13> <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772583F0E3B03@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> <8b0acf96-cba9-6c91-92c4-93674052e995@intel.com> <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772583F0E4E05@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772583F0E6B54@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772583F0F039A@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jan_M=C4=99dala?= Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 14:53:16 +0100 Message-ID: To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" Cc: "Yigit, Ferruh" , Thomas Monjalon , Harish Patil , "dev@dpdk.org" , Rahul Lakkireddy , Stephen Hurd , Jakub Palider , John Daley , Adrien Mazarguil , Alejandro Lucero , Rasesh Mody , "Jacob, Jerin" , Yuanhan Liu , "Kulasek, TomaszX" , "olivier.matz@6wind.com" , Yong Wang , "evgenys@amazon.com" , "netanel@amazon.com" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 0/6] add Tx preparation X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 13:53:18 -0000 =E2=80=8BHello, =E2=80=8B > Is there any update on that subject? > =E2=80=8BAt this point we need to have only pseudo-header checksum for TSO.= Maybe there will be new requirements, but that's something I cannot predict at this point. =E2=80=8B > So it seems that standard pseudo-header checksum calculation should be > enough. > Is that correct? > =E2=80=8BYes, this will be enough at this point. We also need to deliver a fix for issue we found during investigation of tx_prep() API. Thanks, Jan=E2=80=8B