Re: [PATCH v2] net/tap: fix to populate fds in secondary process

[kumaraparameshwaran rathinavel <kumaraparamesh92@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 15856 bytes --]

Hi Ferruh,

Please find the consolidated comments for the review. I had missed
answering a few of them in my previous email.

On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 6:05 PM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> wrote:

> On 1/24/2022 12:12 PM, Kumara Parameshwaran wrote:
> > From: Kumara Parameshwaran <kparameshwar@vmware.com>
> >
> > When a tap device is hotplugged to primary process which in turn
> > adds the device to all secondary process, the secondary process
> > does a tap_mp_attach_queues, but the fds are not populated in
> > the primary during the probe they are populated during the queue_setup,
> > added a fix to sync the queues during rte_eth_dev_start
> >
> > Fixes: 4852aa8f6e21 ("drivers/net: enable hotplug on secondary process")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kumara Parameshwaran <kparameshwar@vmware.com>
> > ---
> >
> > v2:
> > * Addressed review comments to move the function declaration and version
> >    map
> >
>
> Thanks for adding patch version.
>
> >   drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c | 196 +++++++++++++---------------------
> >   lib/ethdev/ethdev_driver.h    |  17 +++
> >   lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c       |  11 ++
> >   lib/ethdev/version.map        |   2 +
> >   4 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 124 deletions(-)
> >
>
> Can you please separate etdev (API) changes to another patch, so this will
> be a patchset
> with two patches,
> first patch adds ethdev API
> second patch is tap patch, that uses the API in the first patch
> Sure, will do it.
>


> > diff --git a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> > index f1b48cae82..f6c25d7e21 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> > @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@
> >       (TAP_GSO_MBUFS_PER_CORE * TAP_GSO_MBUF_CACHE_SIZE)
> >
> >   /* IPC key for queue fds sync */
> > -#define TAP_MP_KEY "tap_mp_sync_queues"
> > +#define TAP_MP_REQ_START_RXTX "tap_mp_req_start_rxtx"
> >
>
> We said we can drop "tap_mp_sync_queues", but thinking twice,
> will current implementation cover following usecase:
>
> - Primary applicaiton started with tap interface, all config, setup,
>    start done
> - Secondary app started without any parameter
>
> Since primary already started, I think secondary fds will be wrong,
> what do you think?
> Yes, will retain the old behaviour.
> >   #define TAP_IOV_DEFAULT_MAX 1024
> >
> > @@ -880,11 +880,48 @@ tap_link_set_up(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> >       return tap_ioctl(pmd, SIOCSIFFLAGS, &ifr, 1, LOCAL_AND_REMOTE);
> >   }
> >
> > +static int tap_mp_req_on_rxtx(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>
> Can you please follow the coding convention:
> Sure, will follow it.
> static int
> tap_mp_req_on_rxtx(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> {
>
> > +{
> > +     struct rte_mp_msg msg;
> > +     struct ipc_queues *request_param = (struct ipc_queues *)msg.param;
> > +     int err;
> > +     int fd_iterator = 0;
> > +     struct pmd_process_private *process_private = dev->process_private;
> > +     int i;
> > +
> > +     memset(&msg, 0, sizeof(msg));
> > +     strlcpy(msg.name, TAP_MP_REQ_START_RXTX, sizeof(msg.name));
> > +     strlcpy(request_param->port_name, dev->data->name,
> sizeof(request_param->port_name));
> > +     msg.len_param = sizeof(*request_param);
> > +     for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_tx_queues; i++) {
> > +             msg.fds[fd_iterator++] = process_private->txq_fds[i];
> > +             msg.num_fds++;
> > +             request_param->txq_count++;
> > +     }
> > +     for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_rx_queues; i++) {
> > +             msg.fds[fd_iterator++] = process_private->rxq_fds[i];
> > +             msg.num_fds++;
> > +             request_param->rxq_count++;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     err = rte_mp_sendmsg(&msg);
> > +     if (err < 0) {
> > +             TAP_LOG(ERR, "Failed to send start req to secondary %d",
> > +                     rte_errno);
> > +             return -1;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >   static int
> >   tap_dev_start(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> >   {
> >       int err, i;
> >
> > +     if (rte_eal_process_type() == RTE_PROC_PRIMARY)
> > +             tap_mp_req_on_rxtx(dev);
> > +
> >       err = tap_intr_handle_set(dev, 1);
> >       if (err)
> >               return err;
> > @@ -901,6 +938,34 @@ tap_dev_start(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> >       return err;
> >   }
> >
> > +static int
> > +tap_mp_req_start_rxtx(const struct rte_mp_msg *request, __rte_unused
> const void *peer)
> > +{
>
> I asked last time but I don't remember the response,
> what should be in the 'peer' variable?
> The peer variable is currently unused. The primary does not expect any
> response from secondary processes. Should we change the model to
> rte_mp_request_sync rather than rte_mp_send_msg?
>


> > +     struct rte_eth_dev *dev;
> > +     const struct ipc_queues *request_param =
> > +             (const struct ipc_queues *)request->param;
> > +     int fd_iterator;
> > +     int queue;
> > +     struct pmd_process_private *process_private;
> > +
> > +     dev = rte_get_eth_dev_by_name(request_param->port_name);
> > +     if (!dev) {
> > +             TAP_LOG(ERR, "Failed to get dev for %s",
> > +                     request_param->port_name);
> > +             return -1;
> > +     }
> > +     process_private = dev->process_private;
> > +     fd_iterator = 0;
> > +     TAP_LOG(DEBUG, "tap_attach rx_q:%d tx_q:%d\n",
> request_param->rxq_count,
> > +             request_param->txq_count);
> > +     for (queue = 0; queue < request_param->txq_count; queue++)
> > +             process_private->txq_fds[queue] =
> request->fds[fd_iterator++];
> > +     for (queue = 0; queue < request_param->rxq_count; queue++)
> > +             process_private->rxq_fds[queue] =
> request->fds[fd_iterator++];
> > +
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >   /* This function gets called when the current port gets stopped.
> >    */
> >   static int
> > @@ -1084,6 +1149,7 @@ tap_dev_close(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> >
> >       if (rte_eal_process_type() != RTE_PROC_PRIMARY) {
> >               rte_free(dev->process_private);
> > +             rte_mp_action_unregister(TAP_MP_REQ_START_RXTX);
> >               return 0;
> >       }
> >
> > @@ -1140,8 +1206,6 @@ tap_dev_close(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> >               internals->ioctl_sock = -1;
> >       }
> >       rte_free(dev->process_private);
> > -     if (tap_devices_count == 1)
> > -             rte_mp_action_unregister(TAP_MP_KEY);
> >       tap_devices_count--;
> >       /*
> >        * Since TUN device has no more opened file descriptors
> > @@ -2292,113 +2356,6 @@ rte_pmd_tun_probe(struct rte_vdev_device *dev)
> >       return ret;
> >   }
> >
> > -/* Request queue file descriptors from secondary to primary. */
> > -static int
> > -tap_mp_attach_queues(const char *port_name, struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> > -{
> > -     int ret;
> > -     struct timespec timeout = {.tv_sec = 1, .tv_nsec = 0};
> > -     struct rte_mp_msg request, *reply;
> > -     struct rte_mp_reply replies;
> > -     struct ipc_queues *request_param = (struct ipc_queues
> *)request.param;
> > -     struct ipc_queues *reply_param;
> > -     struct pmd_process_private *process_private = dev->process_private;
> > -     int queue, fd_iterator;
> > -
> > -     /* Prepare the request */
> > -     memset(&request, 0, sizeof(request));
> > -     strlcpy(request.name, TAP_MP_KEY, sizeof(request.name));
> > -     strlcpy(request_param->port_name, port_name,
> > -             sizeof(request_param->port_name));
> > -     request.len_param = sizeof(*request_param);
> > -     /* Send request and receive reply */
> > -     ret = rte_mp_request_sync(&request, &replies, &timeout);
> > -     if (ret < 0 || replies.nb_received != 1) {
> > -             TAP_LOG(ERR, "Failed to request queues from primary: %d",
> > -                     rte_errno);
> > -             return -1;
> > -     }
> > -     reply = &replies.msgs[0];
> > -     reply_param = (struct ipc_queues *)reply->param;
> > -     TAP_LOG(DEBUG, "Received IPC reply for %s",
> reply_param->port_name);
> > -
> > -     /* Attach the queues from received file descriptors */
> > -     if (reply_param->rxq_count + reply_param->txq_count !=
> reply->num_fds) {
> > -             TAP_LOG(ERR, "Unexpected number of fds received");
> > -             return -1;
> > -     }
> > -
> > -     dev->data->nb_rx_queues = reply_param->rxq_count;
> > -     dev->data->nb_tx_queues = reply_param->txq_count;
> > -     fd_iterator = 0;
> > -     for (queue = 0; queue < reply_param->rxq_count; queue++)
> > -             process_private->rxq_fds[queue] =
> reply->fds[fd_iterator++];
> > -     for (queue = 0; queue < reply_param->txq_count; queue++)
> > -             process_private->txq_fds[queue] =
> reply->fds[fd_iterator++];
> > -     free(reply);
> > -     return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > -/* Send the queue file descriptors from the primary process to
> secondary. */
> > -static int
> > -tap_mp_sync_queues(const struct rte_mp_msg *request, const void *peer)
> > -{
> > -     struct rte_eth_dev *dev;
> > -     struct pmd_process_private *process_private;
> > -     struct rte_mp_msg reply;
> > -     const struct ipc_queues *request_param =
> > -             (const struct ipc_queues *)request->param;
> > -     struct ipc_queues *reply_param =
> > -             (struct ipc_queues *)reply.param;
> > -     uint16_t port_id;
> > -     int queue;
> > -     int ret;
> > -
> > -     /* Get requested port */
> > -     TAP_LOG(DEBUG, "Received IPC request for %s",
> request_param->port_name);
> > -     ret = rte_eth_dev_get_port_by_name(request_param->port_name,
> &port_id);
> > -     if (ret) {
> > -             TAP_LOG(ERR, "Failed to get port id for %s",
> > -                     request_param->port_name);
> > -             return -1;
> > -     }
> > -     dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
> > -     process_private = dev->process_private;
> > -
> > -     /* Fill file descriptors for all queues */
> > -     reply.num_fds = 0;
> > -     reply_param->rxq_count = 0;
> > -     if (dev->data->nb_rx_queues + dev->data->nb_tx_queues >
> > -                     RTE_MP_MAX_FD_NUM){
> > -             TAP_LOG(ERR, "Number of rx/tx queues exceeds max number of
> fds");
> > -             return -1;
> > -     }
> > -
> > -     for (queue = 0; queue < dev->data->nb_rx_queues; queue++) {
> > -             reply.fds[reply.num_fds++] =
> process_private->rxq_fds[queue];
> > -             reply_param->rxq_count++;
> > -     }
> > -     RTE_ASSERT(reply_param->rxq_count == dev->data->nb_rx_queues);
> > -
> > -     reply_param->txq_count = 0;
> > -     for (queue = 0; queue < dev->data->nb_tx_queues; queue++) {
> > -             reply.fds[reply.num_fds++] =
> process_private->txq_fds[queue];
> > -             reply_param->txq_count++;
> > -     }
> > -     RTE_ASSERT(reply_param->txq_count == dev->data->nb_tx_queues);
> > -
> > -     /* Send reply */
> > -     strlcpy(reply.name, request->name, sizeof(reply.name));
> > -     strlcpy(reply_param->port_name, request_param->port_name,
> > -             sizeof(reply_param->port_name));
> > -     reply.len_param = sizeof(*reply_param);
> > -     if (rte_mp_reply(&reply, peer) < 0) {
> > -             TAP_LOG(ERR, "Failed to reply an IPC request to sync
> queues");
> > -             return -1;
> > -     }
> > -     return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> >   /* Open a TAP interface device.
> >    */
> >   static int
> > @@ -2442,9 +2399,11 @@ rte_pmd_tap_probe(struct rte_vdev_device *dev)
> >                       return -1;
> >               }
> >
> > -             ret = tap_mp_attach_queues(name, eth_dev);
> > -             if (ret != 0)
> > -                     return -1;
> > +             ret = rte_mp_action_register(TAP_MP_REQ_START_RXTX,
> tap_mp_req_start_rxtx);
> > +             if (ret < 0 && rte_errno != ENOTSUP)
> > +                     TAP_LOG(ERR, "tap: Failed to register IPC
> callback: %s",
> > +                             strerror(rte_errno));
> > +
> >               rte_eth_dev_probing_finish(eth_dev);
> >               return 0;
> >       }
> > @@ -2492,15 +2451,6 @@ rte_pmd_tap_probe(struct rte_vdev_device *dev)
> >
> >       TAP_LOG(DEBUG, "Initializing pmd_tap for %s", name);
> >
> > -     /* Register IPC feed callback */
> > -     if (!tap_devices_count) {
> > -             ret = rte_mp_action_register(TAP_MP_KEY,
> tap_mp_sync_queues);
> > -             if (ret < 0 && rte_errno != ENOTSUP) {
> > -                     TAP_LOG(ERR, "tap: Failed to register IPC
> callback: %s",
> > -                             strerror(rte_errno));
> > -                     goto leave;
> > -             }
> > -     }
> >       tap_devices_count++;
> >       tap_devices_count_increased = 1;
> >       ret = eth_dev_tap_create(dev, tap_name, remote_iface, &user_mac,
> > @@ -2511,8 +2461,6 @@ rte_pmd_tap_probe(struct rte_vdev_device *dev)
> >               TAP_LOG(ERR, "Failed to create pmd for %s as %s",
> >                       name, tap_name);
> >               if (tap_devices_count_increased == 1) {
> > -                     if (tap_devices_count == 1)
> > -                             rte_mp_action_unregister(TAP_MP_KEY);
> >                       tap_devices_count--;
> >               }
> >       }
> > diff --git a/lib/ethdev/ethdev_driver.h b/lib/ethdev/ethdev_driver.h
> > index d95605a355..a08991bcdf 100644
> > --- a/lib/ethdev/ethdev_driver.h
> > +++ b/lib/ethdev/ethdev_driver.h
> > @@ -1629,6 +1629,23 @@ rte_eth_hairpin_queue_peer_bind(uint16_t
> cur_port, uint16_t cur_queue,
> >                               struct rte_hairpin_peer_info *peer_info,
> >                               uint32_t direction);
> >
> > +/**
>
> Please add '@internal' tag into doxygen comment.
> Sure, will do it.
> > +* Get rte_eth_dev from device name. The device name should be specified
> > +* as below:
> > +* - PCIe address (Domain:Bus:Device.Function), for example- 0000:2:00.0
> > +* - SoC device name, for example- fsl-gmac0
> > +* - vdev dpdk name, for example- net_[pcap0|null0|tap0]
> > +*
> > +* @param name
> > +*  pci address or name of the device
> > +* @return
> > +*   - rte_eth_dev if successful
> > +*   - NULL on failure
> > +*/
> > +__rte_internal
> > +struct rte_eth_dev*
> > +rte_get_eth_dev_by_name(const char *name);
>
> As the API name, better to start with 'rte_eth_' prefix to be consistent
> with
> rest of the APIs.
> I suggest 'rte_eth_dev_get_by_name' but feel free to chose better one.
> Sure, will change it.
> > +
> >   /**
> >    * @internal
> >    * Reset the current queue state and configuration to disconnect
> (unbind) it
> > diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> > index a1d475a292..9192b0d664 100644
> > --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> > @@ -894,6 +894,17 @@ rte_eth_dev_get_port_by_name(const char *name,
> uint16_t *port_id)
> >       return -ENODEV;
> >   }
> >
> > +struct rte_eth_dev *
> > +rte_get_eth_dev_by_name(const char *name)
> > +{
> > +     uint16_t pid;
> > +
> > +     if (rte_eth_dev_get_port_by_name(name, &pid))
> > +             return NULL;
> > +
> > +     return &rte_eth_devices[pid];
> > +}
> > +
> >   static int
> >   eth_err(uint16_t port_id, int ret)
> >   {
> > diff --git a/lib/ethdev/version.map b/lib/ethdev/version.map
> > index c2fb0669a4..7e3797189b 100644
> > --- a/lib/ethdev/version.map
> > +++ b/lib/ethdev/version.map
> > @@ -256,6 +256,7 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
> >       rte_flow_flex_item_create;
> >       rte_flow_flex_item_release;
> >       rte_flow_pick_transfer_proxy;
> > +
>
> This is unintendent change.
> Will remove it.
> >   };
> >
> >   INTERNAL {
> > @@ -282,4 +283,5 @@ INTERNAL {
> >       rte_eth_representor_id_get;
> >       rte_eth_switch_domain_alloc;
> >       rte_eth_switch_domain_free;
> > +     rte_get_eth_dev_by_name;
>
> Please add in a sorted way.
> Sure.
> >   };
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 21131 bytes --]