From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 345EDA04DD; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 22:19:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF80DED; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 22:19:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-ej1-f50.google.com (mail-ej1-f50.google.com [209.85.218.50]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B87BF3B5 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 22:19:04 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ej1-f50.google.com with SMTP id oq3so9930011ejb.7 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 13:19:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=rA6us5Yfj6y9g/6mmZ2wLQrC3UARkjkZZ4/teCzVTuc=; b=Qe3g/YGvvd1LxL6yYnA+Sms7x75KAhp5U0Rwjv8zoKd042Z6Fht6ym3R2VctxDAvfp 7Mte9KqRKwPmqYIdIm47U8vBvec/09hjLXZGa1Rh1yn/lwDMEknp79QhK5ZCA9Is2H+s v8rrnkYjQsiBH+53iHaG+A0U6FEImMV1TJHhw= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=rA6us5Yfj6y9g/6mmZ2wLQrC3UARkjkZZ4/teCzVTuc=; b=YDHQZMBuaVHHNEJhpJjBV44XfcZWn514+7nsMkrKVpPHNUqQaRMBijyvC4DJbeFU2u FLY3fKeWMyV0gmM6Y8xi7RXZPLIOuw2wpyhUzGU1QaydgocLrgsik/l5fyONVmSwvCat QcvByKl/cILsja6TaZnLyoOpuyjUwn+3OdWLq6/M8AbF1HVyZYRUExAYHbc8z+kj7xND uTBTHpSHDQbNJGUgNM3G9tn2UQnP49GEvZWpda81uvbV2SxCzGmttzetIYXQAZpMiu2y EiuKf4w7kJDlzNuXAJQvq04xcBVCcrydU2VohBaLNTe+yDQElv24KR369EN7FM3CGpdE 1CBA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ywWEb3qVPb/OKtM1zoiHKJXV9wkDFT8msVNFjdt2IJ86jkCnj zZBwh8sdT92qbeo1o0VQJDu49pswc0DgUYKiuLQkN2nsfyIrrg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy/CULTGpA3COxNo6lPhDYEhQroARpvVNxPo+2iG+TKYEQ/7L3Gr6tpfk63Eag+eWkJxsRuuIT9AK+UlOyMp6A= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:36d9:: with SMTP id b25mr13101369ejc.155.1605820744064; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 13:19:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Lincoln Lavoie Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 16:17:34 -0500 Message-ID: To: dev@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: [dpdk-dev] Pausing failing tests X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hello All, The CI group discussed an issue that has recently come up, where some tests are failing for a well known cause. The conclusion was, in cases where the failure is well known or a patch is already in process (i.e. in DPDK or a downstream project like SPDK), a DPDK maintainer can submit a request (via bugzilla) to remove the failing test from operation. The CI labs will act on the ticket and then re-assign it to the maintainer. It is the maintainer's responsibility to then alert the CI labs when the bug / failure is fixed and the test should be re-enabled. The bugzilla ticket must remain open until the test is re-enabled. Community CI Minutes: https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/ci/2020-November/000894.html Example Bugzilla Ticket: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=579 Cheers, Lincoln -- Lincoln Lavoie Senior Engineer, Broadband Technologies 21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824 lylavoie@iol.unh.edu https://www.iol.unh.edu +1-603-674-2755 (m)