From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6442AA09FF; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:58:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F06E140CC2; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:58:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-ej1-f45.google.com (mail-ej1-f45.google.com [209.85.218.45]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8960A140CC2 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:58:21 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ej1-f45.google.com with SMTP id n26so24851445eju.6 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 05:58:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8TcLvEagOL/kRxK1H230EB4CF2TB+g9B4Bvkk5+wCc0=; b=YUZPXyMj+EqRUZdDdWKPmdjOGE6DZL/FDKSWnCEBPlCLZ/3kgubTeqEP8nbG0n9s3F QBzF36grMrXBmgBG9TbDcIhO1NijCUKTdu/yqeCKQKaV2AIatBs4De9BBT+7Up7/Yvs3 k5uE+WY8xBaj4/4xbW+njRLfDWRWV9ylwepbY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8TcLvEagOL/kRxK1H230EB4CF2TB+g9B4Bvkk5+wCc0=; b=f9+eu0S2Tt9wJhAXnaIkV/FgRT9ACggQ0WHb7FKBGJOI3T188bzXM7bHyPX0fHVJn6 qG5QKlz+QaeKUnQmn5IZc+Cixeghu6XlP98KU0/AmIPTHowUxVYVGy6ZKbzYJGzWHqUE R6pY7TbS2JHRDAL4yPaq3L1FiL9pBfQwbFjV5TRf2mOWC/XvpRwP0jkOMDwOW+HAmy4a +CU7RceWngJ85jsTf0OVeeG1z7PFKfs47nEKJm5qkI9H/IjVVO0uF8f7u1Kum3KCse0E DD4dvEs8xx/+nWqI2Y/kCmW6WDDZFL92rm7cfZGrGqo/u3xtunwDx1N6PzIVI5JStNXb vh0w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532UV0QO3LHFiG1d6sXScLB+ubAgY+RT2oN+vNdQNel9JOdVs3FT qMBB1I+ddxU+e1TMdK4IcucQzPtlV4yBoAktGXCzJQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzvO9Yymto4HIeliaineb9Aoy1myZe7okBNMjvCOHiLWuL7p8tyhgkrOHbVGguK+0TlZJHtkWy4/3KuntSVY34= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:578e:: with SMTP id k14mr11015956ejq.90.1610373501250; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 05:58:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Lincoln Lavoie Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 08:56:20 -0500 Message-ID: To: Jerin Jacob Cc: David Marchand , dpdklab , dev , ci@dpdk.org, Lukasz Wojciechowski , Aaron Conole , David Hunt Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] distributor test failure in UNH CI on ARM X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi All, How do you want us to handle this in the lab? Can we pull / disable this unit test from the arm system, ignore it from now (if it's going to be fixed), disable the unit tests on arm for now (while it's being fixed)? Cheers, LIncoln On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 8:54 AM Jerin Jacob wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 6:38 PM David Marchand > wrote: > > > > Hey guys, > > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 9:14 AM David Marchand > > wrote: > > > UNH CI is raising failures on a ARM server for the distributor test: > > > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/15077/ > > > > > > Worker 59 handled 0 packets > > > Worker 60 handled 0 packets > > > Worker 61 handled 0 packets > > > Worker 62 handled 0 packets > > > Sanity test with non-zero hashes done > > > === testing big burst (burst) === > > > line 258: Missing packets, expected 783 > > > Test Failed > > > RTE>> > > > --- stderr --- > > > > Looking at the dashboard, I did not see a passing instance of this > > unit test for ARM. > > Did it ever work? > > No. There are a lot of sync barriers are missing in the distributor > library. > Since evendev is kind of replacing this library, we made the fix as > low priority. > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > David Marchand > > > -- *Lincoln Lavoie* Senior Engineer, Broadband Technologies 21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824 lylavoie@iol.unh.edu https://www.iol.unh.edu +1-603-674-2755 (m)