From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA0F3A09FF; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:21:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C93140D34; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:21:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-ej1-f42.google.com (mail-ej1-f42.google.com [209.85.218.42]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48D12140CE5 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:21:17 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ej1-f42.google.com with SMTP id ga15so24997773ejb.4 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 06:21:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=FXwzhzBEoyapsGMo96GhtSFTV4rWv9honr3AjXFCs/0=; b=aV+dDJ1EYVFF/und06UkraLVZYQxt/UXePTnQdiCj0QLMzeuuBbrt8s3diBLt/JI5P 9nbB9iAyKMuDEmxOPAJszzoyR2DYTycL0AD5bSJefuKR7DUEif19bixmjk2G1IeMJVYx f4jT8X+EkZqpdxOvnldrwBWd4Fv0hYQ3IK0dk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=FXwzhzBEoyapsGMo96GhtSFTV4rWv9honr3AjXFCs/0=; b=V+3g5faI99PgHdhRH/cfSHx90nQA8WBW25V387ewu44QwZ3sIdWxgHkeeCmEsLUltK MMTyKx+7iARiwE3p2dKclihuT4IWCYWocufa2U0K+XrcdxBgoqxWOTMvBL7Dfwadqn4L oAmeVSxAi2eNHZE9SWqZWFRju5Rixf2rj0cp/+kv546Lxxqh5DZgxM+0VLv/EWEExt8Q 4atMbqFKN4kTmKYyRcv8hzkBRK++og+uExV8MzkStIOefKfM7g/hRVhkHvBicorWs1ZF gExelHYZkvPG8tJ3DvZhc8gfR15F5A0K5s3obTl1shyJ8u0GF1b9pc6lvTvdThxewpY1 bsQA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533IKM2cgrw9wQFC45s63yBdA7OMMVwXI5yBC5G11cZU5ojrzTwd lH+A1Xh87VWsZtzdSTMQ2VABEJue37im1bCYW8ZtLA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzEoagKdsp8NeGxT/WtZUgfRySW455yFu4ByVLDzQxwdTv68GXaj3G8TBECIEN+YXWWmztv6DR+wJOgdErG9sc= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5002:: with SMTP id s2mr10538521ejj.16.1610374877007; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 06:21:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Lincoln Lavoie Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 09:19:15 -0500 Message-ID: To: Jerin Jacob Cc: David Marchand , dpdklab , dev , ci@dpdk.org, Lukasz Wojciechowski , Aaron Conole , David Hunt Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdklab] Re: distributor test failure in UNH CI on ARM X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Jerin, There is a process for this defined. A maintainer should open a BUG for the CI lab, requesting specific tests or test cases be disabled, as it's a known failure being worked on. Once the test is disabled, the bug will be updated / assigned back to the maintainer, and should not be closed until the issue is fixed and the test can be re-enabled. This is so we don't lose track of anything. Cheers, Lincoln On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 9:05 AM Jerin Jacob wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 7:28 PM Lincoln Lavoie > wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> How do you want us to handle this in the lab? Can we pull / disable this >> unit test from the arm system, ignore it from now (if it's going to be >> fixed), disable the unit tests on arm for now (while it's being fixed)? >> > > > Maybe it is better to have a "known issue" based skip mechanism to address > this in CI. > > > >> >> Cheers, >> LIncoln >> >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 8:54 AM Jerin Jacob >> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 6:38 PM David Marchand >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > Hey guys, >>> > >>> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 9:14 AM David Marchand >>> > wrote: >>> > > UNH CI is raising failures on a ARM server for the distributor test: >>> > > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/15077/ >>> > > >>> > > Worker 59 handled 0 packets >>> > > Worker 60 handled 0 packets >>> > > Worker 61 handled 0 packets >>> > > Worker 62 handled 0 packets >>> > > Sanity test with non-zero hashes done >>> > > === testing big burst (burst) === >>> > > line 258: Missing packets, expected 783 >>> > > Test Failed >>> > > RTE>> >>> > > --- stderr --- >>> > >>> > Looking at the dashboard, I did not see a passing instance of this >>> > unit test for ARM. >>> > Did it ever work? >>> >>> No. There are a lot of sync barriers are missing in the distributor >>> library. >>> Since evendev is kind of replacing this library, we made the fix as >>> low priority. >>> >>> >>> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > David Marchand >>> > >>> >> >> >> -- >> *Lincoln Lavoie* >> Senior Engineer, Broadband Technologies >> 21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824 >> lylavoie@iol.unh.edu >> https://www.iol.unh.edu >> +1-603-674-2755 (m) >> >> > -- *Lincoln Lavoie* Senior Engineer, Broadband Technologies 21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824 lylavoie@iol.unh.edu https://www.iol.unh.edu +1-603-674-2755 (m)