From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 777A0A0547; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 17:23:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0106B1606E3; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 17:23:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-ej1-f52.google.com (mail-ej1-f52.google.com [209.85.218.52]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE151606DE for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 17:23:27 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ej1-f52.google.com with SMTP id bl23so25772750ejb.5 for ; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 08:23:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=PwtoFDHftasjirSK0xRjhbdbYrVILmKwtk1Wv9UWktc=; b=F7sHhN64C7i1pnCITeGCuNgG9mk4PByEuWyos6goMToj3rMypHOansU7puZQaa+7+8 +D+NBw2hleN1cnAR5bIAfK66HuVauqi6CcTyRx1zNGTt8saDSXrAN62U6LQHzRJLjTce wVtuqtnUegXEDdlXABGCGob15eOUXdIJTDcqM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PwtoFDHftasjirSK0xRjhbdbYrVILmKwtk1Wv9UWktc=; b=dFkUBHjvYjgzXrBNWikQKMwNlsfpd4zc2AmT1XiUk3cLb1MRKSSIEseCscJZ/XfdVd cgHSR+qN+arEAj+UoEgbnplVPDduiokSLjliOxSpwHBncnXtI4h3r6UrlNr93ujXVwxM Wx0yhfSimDTAIDWexUuGf/EWZNjPJrkhaVLd7L5uETkW1JeBlCLY3GW3+FUFnYBBe/ol u4E+ZIWc89zrKJ+2ZlDe+SHsm4nlSKDnIHF5J/A0KJ9OtUJWn75YzuwOAu5W67u/sB6Q p+e+jFi8PgcxjtBZmkvcq+fHzTTnT+wnb+kRoJ5a2PJini+bz6Q50CcQLboVeXMQVtyj B3oA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530l+RorzARyGQtp4c3PNvB6+xJBopuzf+QMUuS+s4sBbncPx9MS gzbLzdiiLYdNkRipGKfukTbEIm153nQ6WMpCwTeS1w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyzcvq4Kt/5G2nZKDlYW7GJp6YV0bzQ1BGAXm4ohX2hYAaHvixETAgVRQ/EUTNj8hFb/KfJ+NodFIur4Noyh3A= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:cb83:: with SMTP id mf3mr8896796ejb.155.1612801406938; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 08:23:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Lincoln Lavoie Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 11:21:08 -0500 Message-ID: To: "Zawadzki, Tomasz" Cc: Aaron Conole , Brandon Lo , "dpdklab@iol.unh.edu" , "ci@dpdk.org" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "spdk@lists.01.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-ci] [CI] SPDK compilation failures @ DPDK community lab X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Thanks Tomek, Can you let us know when the merge happens and we'll make sure the next set of builds pass or see what the next failure is. :-P Cheers, Lincoln On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:03 AM Zawadzki, Tomasz wrote: > Hi Aaron, > > Thank you for reporting this ! > > This is an issue with rte_power now depending on rte_ethdev, which was > resolved on latest SPDK. > > I believe that UNH lab verifies DPDK patches against SPDK branch for > latest release. Which after the very recent SPDK release, would be v21.01.x: > https://github.com/spdk/spdk/tree/v21.01.x > > The fix has been backported to that branch and should be merged shortly: > https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/6320 > > Thanks, > Tomek > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dev On Behalf Of Aaron Conole > > Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 4:21 PM > > To: Brandon Lo > > Cc: dpdklab@iol.unh.edu; ci@dpdk.org; dev@dpdk.org; spdk@lists.01.org > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [CI] SPDK compilation failures @ DPDK community lab > > > > Greetings, > > > > I've noticed that recently SPDK compilation in the UNH community lab > seems > > to be failing, and I don't see an obvious reason for the failure. > > The logs haven't been too helpful - it appears that there is a symbol > that isn't > > available when linking. > > > > Job details (for example): > > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/results/results- > > uploads/test_runs/2363efb43157465db3228c34c00ebd57/log_upload_file/20 > > 21/2/dpdk_f6f2d2240153_15524_2021-02-04_22-59-59_NA.zip > > > > Is it possible to turn on more verbose logging during the compilation of > > SPDK? Maybe show the arguments to the compiler for the specific object? > > Maybe the SPDK folks can see something obviously wrong? > > > > Thanks, > > -Aaron > > -- *Lincoln Lavoie* Principal Engineer, Broadband Technologies 21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824 lylavoie@iol.unh.edu https://www.iol.unh.edu +1-603-674-2755 (m)