Re: [dpdk-dev] [Bug 826] red_autotest random failures

[Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1488 bytes --]

On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 3:17 AM David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 5:54 PM Dumitrescu, Cristian
> <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com> wrote:
> > On a different point, we should probably tweak our autotests to
> differentiate between logical failures and those failures related to
> resources not being available, and flag the test result accordingly in the
> report. For example, if memory allocation fails, the test should be flagged
> as "Not enough resources" instead of simply "Failed". In the first case,
> the next step should be fixing the test setup, while in the second case the
> next step should be fixing the code. What do people think on this?
>
> In such case, the test must return TEST_SKIPPED.
>
> If the purpose of the component / function being tested is to get / create
/ reserve the resource(s), the failure might be valid. So it can't be
applied across the board.  But places where the test is checking other
functionality, this might at least prevent some failures that are transient
(i.e. based on what the test could "get" from the system at that moment in
time).



> I did a pass for cores count / specific hw requirements, some time ago.
> See https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=e0f4a0ed4237
>
>
> --
> David Marchand
>
>

-- 
*Lincoln Lavoie*
Principal Engineer, Broadband Technologies
21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824
lylavoie@iol.unh.edu
https://www.iol.unh.edu
+1-603-674-2755 (m)
<https://www.iol.unh.edu>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2996 bytes --]