From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <batmanustc@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qk0-f173.google.com (mail-qk0-f173.google.com
 [209.85.220.173]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12244201
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 11:08:23 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-qk0-f173.google.com with SMTP id c123so21243674qkf.7
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 02:08:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=ZLMUTlvxYtMsMmk/g47k/a73nY50l1htzaNe/GNefLg=;
 b=JWQzbbTM8l85coXmATDTAXnNyamRClACbZ3xlmgyxUc+H07rGLqLwXfagrAfw+sLMo
 BT0XqgnN61Oyx6alZ74BuqahSbXv1j0Nl8e0FA4t3+LAmmvPcy7VxzkeQRfUylzyrPnG
 wKh3jw4R3Cu6FLXUpfnpY8jqoJ0CzvhjQweGnX0F3LYTqLmwtfXC/fHrTwxwgmG5TBTe
 84oG6/DaUT1fj+QZjdEfdWRlHurRx+CGYJmEU6JuPHMbYIsJiXj6vOp+sV3VL3nn3Fzw
 NY4qq9zPFWdOHSUe3MvayJYbtrseO6zOianIfHlJdjMoRIXZZ4NUG0EJq43ojNZlMY4q
 nOoA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to;
 bh=ZLMUTlvxYtMsMmk/g47k/a73nY50l1htzaNe/GNefLg=;
 b=IzY1VO8IJfC1FjEpuUn85xqvPa1GSbo2ag8BUXTrDHff0P5R3pU8M22ZAGAaxzIQlT
 XfOmxRTCY3BlvG4a7Ss3P6hWMBGWlYSqiXjWHkEDZqDc/6+/LML5gGqVtqmGc2HNVkkJ
 QhXMJwHLkclqwfn2SPWGuTthMBzd6ZRk8BuopsdFWddzuZ3Q/P/xccTlXglmrxFNXc1M
 /aLrUtnN6gKo1ZmyVkOzXapZxgLAMawuBzJBDnWbOZC1AEyHAEqKP6r1XqP3wa52bKpP
 6NpUP8KhTfe+IqXLhRQsh3uApagieXEJvK9cODCRkx5p0nEq6dxKVgqaD/upGXDRinYd
 ixoQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX7Xele26i6x3VbhUWbHU+eK//BxVqTf8gK7aqYjv3avUylSI1Yj
 +TOesqAVuAVDa4ipUiipdst+5apUqvBnbJAutAaqwg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMaxRjZFyhLszxehMd0++VymLPha60vn6ZBAO0rOSmctDvZu1qAB2IfIaVilUyo2SYFCFKjocntKUPlHJ/Xeu88=
X-Received: by 10.55.43.156 with SMTP id r28mr57410446qkr.316.1511777302445;
 Mon, 27 Nov 2017 02:08:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.23.165 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 02:08:21 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAOE=1Z3bo+iDps96mWNfVmOVEZg51sR3Mf5tMp7WdV8_k0dO8w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOE=1Z3bo+iDps96mWNfVmOVEZg51sR3Mf5tMp7WdV8_k0dO8w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Sam <batmanustc@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 18:08:21 +0800
Message-ID: <CAOE=1Z1y=eS2s9vkou29qNBdajQywAqnjK9_vRE_Zdj6jETxUg@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org, ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] In ovs-2.4 version,
 why can't stop dpdk-bond port by `ovs-ofctl mod br dpdkbond DOWN`?
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:08:23 -0000

The "dev->port_id" is bond port id, should I use slave port id instead ?

2017-11-27 18:07 GMT+08:00 Sam <batmanustc@gmail.com>:

> Hi all,
>
> I'm working in ovs 2.4 version, and I use "dpdkb" type netdev. Then I
> call  `ovs-ofctl mod br dpdkbond DOWN` to down this device, at last, my
> code call "rte_eth_dev_stop(dev->port_id);".
>
> But counter shows the port is still rx/tx, why?
>