From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <batmanustc@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qk0-f177.google.com (mail-qk0-f177.google.com
 [209.85.220.177]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42387201
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 11:07:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-qk0-f177.google.com with SMTP id 136so31624518qkd.4
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 02:07:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=esm7wi5SJW5yISlF/C74a+iqNQ9dCadaVH+cLvPGwns=;
 b=ZMXMiNwob1GWcTCoggwC46ljfe83YGSl+rr89CGnHJCRUbPmoO+rZCEY5kZy1A1tBD
 jPkAvSG/NIolLa7Ypayb0t2EUzTi9mD7wWhF6NliLTskacWzb9gAizNzGBhbvVSLNTzE
 iD/5ia5RM//3LupXFREtYUP7ciB2hkeZ1nVzCnKjSsm7ItvAiwkJKWhhWoGDcPhD5upW
 l3Stacn2XgnUPLCPEOM2Qd4BZtt9bW6nnKNG8J9j6dYJoAt5bSQFdo+w/uE73xsVIf02
 aJgxqG7eE07L+CPj2vb4defSQf3c7AjwOBWR8l7WmJv7ZMACW+PhjgIjIAyZg60Ut8bV
 khqw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=esm7wi5SJW5yISlF/C74a+iqNQ9dCadaVH+cLvPGwns=;
 b=BNQpJh875/UrhydIVKzrr5xw9SXs+lFIa7bO5T6eSGdiODxnQb5jIrbw37TyjNOBs/
 /wPZ+xRXMA3gq7v79RrITl6dkhU1s2ur9n4jmemLmXqfjNGH+jdQatS53WaMyQu6lgJA
 5vjKmQPktuvVetjCIoq1t1OKtJnPLhi8+D8cVuxDzIUox3Z8HYv/CvCTwCuDP1HtJbnS
 Q1G6uGV4isECsJO7BWKUuyu2QZiJuPfjWmppWRmqM1lngE1BVFIJgZJokCymffkq3/at
 fD3E9Ep4bEW9wNYFuvmYnenwLrfJGYZ1b0HE4sQd1irLCyinrz/7/QO15zglP2BYxEqx
 M1CQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX6iJibSHuF2qrNZudiOS4t9lnVax9ytS645QgB+Djz48zNsBKTN
 4d0tuprb8RsukaedamzqBezvu0srjOJb0V92O6Yljg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMasxe4Wh7UmyTYJDAtuziF1mPKA4KkncENzCN+eznN0oTr9F9/GJh+3OIBQXBWXLrTVZv39LGK8Cmv3OA8gJc0=
X-Received: by 10.55.221.80 with SMTP id n77mr1205912qki.279.1511777256424;
 Mon, 27 Nov 2017 02:07:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.23.165 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 02:07:35 -0800 (PST)
From: Sam <batmanustc@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 18:07:35 +0800
Message-ID: <CAOE=1Z3bo+iDps96mWNfVmOVEZg51sR3Mf5tMp7WdV8_k0dO8w@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org, ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-dev] In ovs-2.4 version,
 why can't stop dpdk-bond port by `ovs-ofctl mod br dpdkbond DOWN`?
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:07:37 -0000

Hi all,

I'm working in ovs 2.4 version, and I use "dpdkb" type netdev. Then I
call  `ovs-ofctl mod br dpdkbond DOWN` to down this device, at last, my
code call "rte_eth_dev_stop(dev->port_id);".

But counter shows the port is still rx/tx, why?