DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daeyoung Kim <kdy1029@gmail.com>
To: Keunhong Lee <dlrmsghd@gmail.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Receiving packets on only one port
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 14:22:56 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOFzDNxTK7N8=UG1DMEw6Y2kOeqfxhnYSHUtiWUDA7G6TvtCqA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKBXKmAdfCBtqXk5c1=kE_gWz3tKxs+_TsfPaEUh1m=oDQYqhw@mail.gmail.com>

I found my problem that one of switches has VLAN option. So basic l3fwd
cannot just look into the packets. Now I solved the problem. Thank you for
your help.

Regards,
Daeyoung

2015-06-29 11:44 GMT-04:00 Keunhong Lee <dlrmsghd@gmail.com>:

> Check that whether you are polling all RX queues of your program.
> You said that your configuration works well with Wireshark.
> So I don't think that this is the problem.
>
> You can check your port statistics for the number of received packets.
> If the statistics show 2 packets, but you received 1 packet, then your
> program might have mistakes.
>
> Keunhong.
>
>
> 2015-06-30 0:39 GMT+09:00 Daeyoung Kim <kdy1029@gmail.com>:
>
>> OK, I see. My program uses RSS. Is it related to my problem? If the
>> testpmd application does not work, the switch configuration might be wrong.
>> Am I right?
>>
>> Thank you for your answer.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Daeyoung
>>
>> 2015-06-29 11:28 GMT-04:00 Keunhong Lee <dlrmsghd@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Actually I have no idea why this happens.
>>> If your switch configuration is correct, your program should work just
>>> like Wireshark does.
>>> I wander whether your program uses RSS.
>>> In my opinion, program bug is the most probable reason.
>>>
>>> Keunhong.
>>>
>>>
>>> 2015-06-29 23:32 GMT+09:00 Daeyoung Kim <kdy1029@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> Hi Keunhong,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your help. Here is the network topology.
>>>>
>>>> DNS Client - Switch 1 - Switch 2 - Switch 3 - DNS Server
>>>>                              |                                  |
>>>>                          port 0                          port 1
>>>>
>>>> DPDK port 0 receives packets using from the Switch 1 port mirroring and
>>>> port 1 receives packets from the Switch 2 using port mirroring as well. As
>>>> I already said, when I send DNS packets, the wireshark simultaneously gets
>>>> all the packets on two ports. I'm sorry what I told you is incorrect. Using
>>>> my program with promiscuous mode, the port 0 receives only DNS queries from
>>>> the DNS client, but the port 1 receives only DNS replies from the DNS
>>>> server. I'd like to know why it happens.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you very much!
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Daeyoung
>>>>
>>>> 2015-06-28 20:22 GMT-04:00 Keunhong Lee <dlrmsghd@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> I don't know your situation exactly, but here are possible problems.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Your switch learned MAC addresses of two ports.
>>>>> 2. Your program bug.
>>>>> 3. l3fwd itself contains some bug.
>>>>> 4. You did not set all ports in promiscuous mode.
>>>>>
>>>>> You'd better try 'pktgen' application to test your environment.
>>>>>
>>>>> Keunhong.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2015-06-27 0:45 GMT+09:00 Daeyoung Kim <kdy1029@gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm writing a packet capture program from the l3fwd. When I send DNS
>>>>>> packets, the wireshark simultaneously gets all the packets on two
>>>>>> ports.
>>>>>> However, using my program with promiscuous mode, one port receives
>>>>>> all the
>>>>>> packets, but the other port gets nothing. Do you know why it happens?
>>>>>> Could
>>>>>> it be network topology problem using DPDK, a DPDK design like
>>>>>> forwarding
>>>>>> mechanism, or just my program bugs? Any comments would be appreciated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Daeyoung
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

      reply	other threads:[~2015-06-30 18:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-26 15:45 Daeyoung Kim
2015-06-29  0:22 ` Keunhong Lee
2015-06-29 14:32   ` Daeyoung Kim
2015-06-29 15:28     ` Keunhong Lee
2015-06-29 15:39       ` Daeyoung Kim
2015-06-29 15:44         ` Keunhong Lee
2015-06-30 18:22           ` Daeyoung Kim [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAOFzDNxTK7N8=UG1DMEw6Y2kOeqfxhnYSHUtiWUDA7G6TvtCqA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=kdy1029@gmail.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dlrmsghd@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).