From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-f173.google.com (mail-ie0-f173.google.com [209.85.223.173]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B12C382 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 16:43:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: by iesa3 with SMTP id a3so15397553ies.2 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 07:43:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=HU9UwejueRat+nOf56nZq40GABhv3v1ptZpjy42rzf4=; b=badU71uA243wXya+46+yiisnzqaxOnfvtNtAfB3RsLN6zqk6tEez0yPkDXW76Np/tc +YEFCvZP/GkLH2uYf9b4L2W2QDiEz3BV+EJw7hr5vyYnQypR0OLhQJuZgcLejx2dOjNe C8Py4bnMck2eZSreSQOpqTzZ/Qg6m2rMLOgdRCW36ZcOOYUQXoUcKFhN3Hy4J9oe0HuT r+9UWEQmaofAp1QK1FcWPWzsdbVJiD/ik69IWGF1SDzWtUPxwzh3+ICxZ/c9Jp2yV0U9 48pJX+dtW39ZafWWDqafquzmkOP2JXmVBgPnN0eqNcoSKkDCoRonsaFqSWuKGYEL7IIQ tW9w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmTPlemGHJAz1JF9zZiF0JT+KnrDvQT4/3iMV61UZ77eMPb4P8n44T6H0JCF/k1fd4kUgyJ MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.41.8 with SMTP id b8mr21628265igl.38.1432046594278; Tue, 19 May 2015 07:43:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.58.227 with HTTP; Tue, 19 May 2015 07:43:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA54D43080@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA54D43080@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 07:43:14 -0700 Message-ID: From: Stephen Hemminger To: "O'Driscoll, Tim" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Technical Steering Committee (TSC) X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 14:43:15 -0000 > > > > Composition of the TSC should reflect contributions to the project, but be > balanced so that no single party has an undue influence. It should also be > kept to a manageable size(maybe 7?). > > The TSC should elect its own chair, who would have the deciding vote in > the event that the TSC was deadlocked. Once in place, the TSC should > approve any new members. > > Specific details on membership can be discussed and agreed later, if we > agree on the creation of a TSC. > TSC should be limited to those individuals and companies that have contributed in a non-trivial way to the DPDK distributed code base. It should not be a users group, or place for network vendors who take but never give back.