From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f176.google.com (mail-io0-f176.google.com [209.85.223.176]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B21C158F7 for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 06:44:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: by ioiz6 with SMTP id z6so45001005ioi.2 for ; Wed, 02 Sep 2015 21:44:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=BtTLRr6jcKAXj78/BJTxAc5GtNRFbYLobi7Fu4onmG8=; b=DS50JuffwgB3u58jz/86nHR9ag761QvAw28wcLdEh3uvzwhUx72W8odPioLiCKRgC9 CGhd08GygqP8X3M8A5fkSWWd2tEp/S22uoLYPXYELbBLPMaK2KY1DUncr+ytfzZme0f8 Yded5TS/F894L4ZcaURGpiU1AAERDmQ/RRV+D88SSysoMAt8BaLMJYows+oJVEn8ZqjA INJKhouS60oTOU0BUTIXg8PT3zMwJnxIf9hJZAzq1Nl1ozBU1c7XyN1VXcvKDdZ6sEwL +uQYBw+RkVjkjCuDYEXF1ozOqLu06wSalDb0z6piMIX5q9223FlqPUoHaVnoVOgjuZP9 0PGQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmIrxI1RRrKGW9vS5Zee2/jlLxH3wAD8+2QTe5U2f9HCUqbZcbmQor1wRBhadlDcDZaeh+/ MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.154.199 with SMTP id c190mr40047389ioe.154.1441255442072; Wed, 02 Sep 2015 21:44:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.197.39 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 21:44:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.197.39 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 21:44:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 21:44:01 -0700 Message-ID: From: Stephen Hemminger To: "Dey, Souvik" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Support of LSI for vmxnet3 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 04:44:02 -0000 The problem is there is no selective disable mask. It is possible using MSIX by redirecting. I have a version with that with new rcv stuff. Still needs work On Sep 2, 2015 9:07 PM, "Dey, Souvik" wrote: > Hi, > Is there any particular reason of nor supporting the > RTE_PCI_DRV_INTR_LSC for vmxnet3. I can see we have introduced the same for > the other virtual driver virtio but not for vmxnet3. Do we have some > technical difficulties there ? Can someone throw some light on this. > > > -- > Regards, > Souvik >