From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-f175.google.com (mail-ie0-f175.google.com [209.85.223.175]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE3B5A67 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:33:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: by iedfl3 with SMTP id fl3so45115160ied.1 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:33:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=T0hQFGZipIhNGnLp48JMrQF9Js4wZ05tC9wH4Jy0B/U=; b=boTFAe+rxqiwiyAvY+tBi868f8gvi8KdFCQJQS05Zyxk0HCW1IV2W2XGGVIFDI3QAK 2bx7WhjnRaVEdhRukBeTQ4E1JCnTIPCV/VndyAy5V9yLEX0aW+dhpvcnqhFDR7S3G4ah 9/gbF/FpFLWkG0z8lIycUlLgasKFcrU9QcQOIL51GDHPEuOERa7YvZTvVWhSm01AV7aI kKzi2/ugxHCKZGbDIF8A//bwXyr1OzJV092r80N69cAWPrRcoEOLFlEL3+OgLk9ozwOb +Q0gL6s1WI4Ssai6P09qYre6U3p7YRADoIHH+Q3Q4LdQduPl+S0Dn/ELK6WjcbkJiKhO H1Qw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnd1+0XvWNjK/gxVkSY5/pLqih1quAxPgzMmK0vPYB06QgEDD8Hqt3vWaQLnl/vaGDizYoq MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.6.220 with SMTP id f89mr36920536ioi.78.1429716816712; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:33:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.58.227 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:33:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA54D29B55@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA54D1A917@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA54D29B55@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:33:36 -0700 Message-ID: From: Stephen Hemminger To: "O'Driscoll, Tim" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Beyond DPDK 2.0 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 15:33:37 -0000 This does a good job of stating the need for action without getting into the details. Perhaps this would be better resolved by some more interactive discussion. I know it is hard to all get together, but there needs to be more some more creative and focused thought on this. A phone conference is just not enough. Alternatively, propose some options and vote, but I don't think we have things defined enough for that yet.