From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EACCA0C41; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 19:45:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD924014F; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 19:45:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-io1-f45.google.com (mail-io1-f45.google.com [209.85.166.45]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F1C140041 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 19:45:36 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-io1-f45.google.com with SMTP id p65so4971094iof.3 for ; Fri, 03 Dec 2021 10:45:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=NSFznIJH4ENyFgBwOx+ncDmR7szSKv4BDTssMNExvos=; b=TEDfdZorLu5KOP+3J+ZU8tZiUwJWR0mCkeehrYe7g6lWi3zGqAKXmm05njRgZ8SL+C JjjWrJtSzTKz9vii9PIYYuZOrjeGhTnTmW3MM5syb0jgBGNNAprwxM46nNiRU/e6N0QE u8BJnaD2nUXqmXpXBAqJKBXtkko/IcOJoeQXU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NSFznIJH4ENyFgBwOx+ncDmR7szSKv4BDTssMNExvos=; b=aq6XrgNx3aHQ3wT8vwaY6rPl59B0IFfYMsndlcfuIzrkwuo2Zr8z80uRUVgU8sZ4Ke Kv8r8iAiAjcTVHhXnaXqkzyyX7koqlY0vgNEao4R3Ku2/s2o1mbO4wHPb5iE4GCk2uwc tk+f5AA/K5kdWnX7jRgaiPctO+fth/3pqEYW9/sr/f885IovsqKVV5v4Q69jMVOv4rYk u4l/5wTbP0CLi8XaPgmJbewMkkf/uskqeBK/GRZHZ5qOJaVxuk2gnAcEXQUfsc0FgZbP qYZ+MYYsIxHxdKyRW1uiV41nUa06RAdvt7IVXq00/jkW4fBBrXqSfA3bnCHhatDJ9J5v 90wQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530rtJSmrRupkXVKRMQRNP+DV+fIBixcU+QQ1Cvv1N2e3oLz3pRP ng2e8VPS83dmrOLYO4WyZ7OhCiN4utd5m6WzgVe3Bj70D5U= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx7ZSrPwiGjn3vkHhF/ShSlr4ya2M0/QLS8ILHvtbQbUDVWsCm6JkINvJ5jSQSBkHqagT7lsrB9MpWlAE1oMu8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:252:: with SMTP id w18mr26253161jaq.54.1638557135580; Fri, 03 Dec 2021 10:45:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Brandon Lo Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 13:44:59 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Question Regarding FIPS Validation in DPDK To: "Mcnamara, John" Cc: "Zhang, Roy Fan" , dev , "Kovacevic, Marko" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 9:45 AM Mcnamara, John wrote: > > At the time the dpdk-fips_validation tool was written the test vectors > > weren't available in JSON format, and, to the best of my knowledge, there > > was a format specification (which is why there is different parsing for > > different algorithms). We (the community) should probably move to the JSON > > format. Adding Fan Zhang since I think this was discussion in the > > community previously. > > Sorry I meant to say " to the best of my knowledge, there *wasn't* a format specification" available. > > John Should we plan to move away from the old format to only use the new JSON format going forward? I believe the file format "CAVS 21.0" is fully deprecated and NIST does not produce any new files in that format. Thanks, Brandon -- Brandon Lo UNH InterOperability Laboratory 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 blo@iol.unh.edu www.iol.unh.edu