From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CCE4A054D; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:59:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DF00160783; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:59:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-io1-f49.google.com (mail-io1-f49.google.com [209.85.166.49]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0AB016077E for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:59:35 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-io1-f49.google.com with SMTP id f6so2030420iop.11 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 05:59:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/X4xnqKDtRzgavToHDtEb9z6qLF9M+nRZnaxZvX/P38=; b=cNOPYY7YfZkXQ05j4WU4NdIeA8n8kXc9xU08b4AwXX+QcFBdvoL4AT3EkRLRjcpi6F u3F9GD9Y+jvVNcrTLLDjnInnUMZ/kO4YABg1vLxgs2dFCfoYKnHoD37CZ4Zt/e8QwWP4 IxC70aR+/TWOGIgh/C53rIgd7qRH7TSSTrZiw= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/X4xnqKDtRzgavToHDtEb9z6qLF9M+nRZnaxZvX/P38=; b=NrxiNi7LtaWyXRCnYgJpV+FiqnJO1oVKz6f66+nx2f9MU5g/45ijgiukjE4xKDOwYl 82YtMrpwVhM6Y64VDBuMDoWjIlBkBdl8VnN5kgopzF3A2x3KHAK8YSkQzHD623WMzd43 Zza36s5m5QfU9DaTA3ckyu/70I03OrOdOP6xaqc0QER/BAvRQUGlqoRbOhtLz/STMNKN 8jN3qZZToWavNgaTdACAS5HBy4mLDPdRJo92C1vXzer1sZL6d1q2igIrjompw9k8bvam wr/EU+abh4ajcXBBZlLzzqW6xTA0qu5B2jp2wOJUT0xdg9/LjBWaMBPb0pYbUZDpAT6m LW5g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533P8GaOCRIPQRubEwynqPJqrEvDAyAzDz3DCTaiwLQsF5GyinzF ujuQV+GJRrH1EBg4BITRKleAqXnQSB9e+sl7iP5N+Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxH6buJmCkU7ohO0I+AQAjblJA9M7sz74j/wY4I+Z3RnGBwo1uF967X9CBJGqQifxDFD+Qx5ckj3uegb6U8bDs= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:8052:: with SMTP id b18mr3691981ior.188.1613656775128; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 05:59:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Brandon Lo Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 08:58:59 -0500 Message-ID: To: "Zawadzki, Tomasz" Cc: Aaron Conole , Lincoln Lavoie , "dpdklab@iol.unh.edu" , "ci@dpdk.org" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "spdk@lists.01.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] [CI] SPDK compilation failures @ DPDK community lab X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Tomek, We have enabled vhost again and it is now in production with passing results as expected. I have closed the bug ticket as well. Thanks, Brandon On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 11:06 AM Zawadzki, Tomasz wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Patch in question is now part of v21.01.x branch and tests in UNH lab can make use of it. > https://github.com/spdk/spdk/commit/14eeeea669010247fa8d6c7ce53b2e69fcfaa858 > > If possible, removing '--without-vhost' would be best going forward. Then SPDK compilation tests would cover rte_vhost too. > > Thanks, > Tomek > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Aaron Conole > > Sent: Monday, February 15, 2021 4:28 PM > > To: Brandon Lo > > Cc: Zawadzki, Tomasz ; Lincoln Lavoie > > ; dpdklab@iol.unh.edu; ci@dpdk.org; dev@dpdk.org; > > spdk@lists.01.org > > Subject: Re: [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] [CI] SPDK compilation failures > > @ DPDK community lab > > > > Brandon Lo writes: > > > > > Hi Tomek, > > > > > > I do not think we have a specific reason for disabling vhost. I can > > > look into enabling it and get back to you on that. > > > > I did a test, but I had to hack up the dockerfile and compile script a bit. > > > > I removed the '--without-vhost' (I also modified it to pull dpdk and SPDK from > > their respective 'main'/'master' branches). The build completed successfully. > > > > I will update the BZ with this information. Can you try testing with the '-- > > without-vhost' removed from the compile_spdk.sh line, and if that is > > successful we can modify the job and re-enable? > > > > > Thanks, > > > Brandon > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 4:18 AM Zawadzki, Tomasz > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> As Aaron noted this was result of rte_ethdev depending on rte_net. > > >> On SPDK side rte_net was included in default compilation with vhost > > >> component, but since vhost is disabled in the UNH lab tests with SPDK > > >> it showed up as missing. A fix for that is now submitted to > > >> SPDK: > > >> https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/6398 > > >> I'll let you know when it makes it's way to the v21.01.x branch. > > >> > > >> @Brandon Lo General question, is there particular reason to disable > > >> vhost [configure argument '--without-vhost'] in the UNH lab tests > > >> with SPDK ? > > >> I don't recall any identified issue and enabling it would increase > > >> the coverage of the compilation tests. > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> Tomek > > >> > > >> > -----Original Message----- > > >> > From: Aaron Conole > > >> > Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2021 3:02 PM > > >> > To: Brandon Lo > > >> > Cc: Zawadzki, Tomasz ; Lincoln Lavoie > > >> > ; dpdklab@iol.unh.edu; ci@dpdk.org; > > >> > dev@dpdk.org; spdk@lists.01.org > > >> > Subject: Re: [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] [CI] SPDK > > >> > compilation failures @ DPDK community lab > > >> > > > >> > Brandon Lo writes: > > >> > > > >> > > Hi again everyone, > > >> > > > > >> > > I have checked the pipelines with SPDK branch v21.01.x on the > > >> > > main DPDK > > >> > branch. > > >> > > It still seems to have an issue with compilation, and I have > > >> > > attached a log of a Fedora SPDK compilation. > > >> > > There are some undefined references to "rte_ether_unformat_addr" > > >> > > I will continue to look into this. If you have any ideas on how > > >> > > to fix this, please let me know. > > >> > > > >> > Looks like rte_ethdev depends on rte_net - maybe I missed something. > > >> > > > >> > Brandon, can we disable this test for the time being since it's > > >> > been failing for a while now? Can you also send me the container > > >> > image / definitions you're using so that I can help work on this? > > >> > > > >> > > Thanks, > > >> > > Brandon > > >> > > > > >> > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 11:07 AM Brandon Lo > > wrote: > > >> > >> > > >> > >> Hi everyone, > > >> > >> > > >> > >> I will adjust the branches and watch over the first few > > >> > >> pipelines to make sure everything goes smoothly. > > >> > >> > > >> > >> Thanks for the update, > > >> > >> Brandon > > >> > >> > > >> > >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 10:13 AM Aaron Conole > > >> > >> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > "Zawadzki, Tomasz" writes: > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > Hi Lincoln, > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > That patch in question is now merged to branch v21.01.x. > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > Good to know - I do still see a failure in the IOL job (even > > >> > >> > from a few hours ago). I suppose the lab side might need some > > >> > >> > adjustment, > > >> > too? > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > The builds performed for latest SPDK and SPDK LTS, against > > >> > >> > > dpdk-main branch seem to be passing. Would love to hear if > > >> > >> > > this is what you are seeing on your end too. > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > Thanks, > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > Tomek > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > From: Lincoln Lavoie > > >> > >> > > Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 5:21 PM > > >> > >> > > To: Zawadzki, Tomasz > > >> > >> > > Cc: Aaron Conole ; Brandon Lo > > >> > >> > > ; dpdklab@iol.unh.edu; ci@dpdk.org; > > >> > >> > > dev@dpdk.org; spdk@lists.01.org > > >> > >> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] [CI] SPDK compilation > > >> > >> > > failures @ DPDK community lab > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > Thanks Tomek, > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > Can you let us know when the merge happens and we'll make > > >> > >> > > sure the next set of builds pass or see what the next > > >> > >> > > failure is. :-P > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > Cheers, > > >> > >> > > Lincoln > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:03 AM Zawadzki, Tomasz > > >> > wrote: > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > Hi Aaron, > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > Thank you for reporting this ! > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > This is an issue with rte_power now depending on > > >> > >> > > rte_ethdev, which > > >> > was resolved on latest SPDK. > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > I believe that UNH lab verifies DPDK patches against SPDK > > >> > >> > > branch for latest release. Which after the very recent SPDK > > >> > >> > > release, would be v21.01.x: > > >> > >> > > https://github.com/spdk/spdk/tree/v21.01.x > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > The fix has been backported to that branch and should be > > >> > >> > > merged > > >> > shortly: > > >> > >> > > https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/6320 > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > Thanks, > > >> > >> > > Tomek > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > -----Original Message----- > From: dev > > >> > >> > > On Behalf Of Aaron Conole > > > >> > >> > > Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 4:21 PM > To: Brandon Lo > > >> > >> > > > Cc: dpdklab@iol.unh.edu; ci@dpdk.org; > > >> > >> > > dev@dpdk.org; spdk@lists.01.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [CI] > > >> > >> > > SPDK compilation failures @ DPDK community lab > > > > >> > >> > > Greetings, > > I've noticed that recently SPDK compilation > > >> > >> > > in the UNH community lab seems > to be failing, and I don't > > >> > >> > > see an obvious reason for the > > >> > failure. > > >> > >> > > > The logs haven't been too helpful - it appears that there > > >> > >> > > is a symbol that isn't > available when linking. > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > Job details (for example): > > >> > >> > > > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/results/results- > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > > uploads/test_runs/2363efb43157465db3228c34c00ebd57/log_upload_fil > > >> > >> > > e/20 > > > >> > >> > > 21/2/dpdk_f6f2d2240153_15524_2021-02-04_22-59-59_NA.zip > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > Is it possible to turn on more verbose logging during the > > >> > >> > > compilation of > SPDK? Maybe show the arguments to the > > >> > >> > > compiler > > >> > for the specific object? > > >> > >> > > > Maybe the SPDK folks can see something obviously wrong? > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > Thanks, > > >> > >> > > > -Aaron > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> -- > > >> > >> > > >> > >> Brandon Lo > > >> > >> > > >> > >> UNH InterOperability Laboratory > > >> > >> > > >> > >> 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 > > >> > >> > > >> > >> blo@iol.unh.edu > > >> > >> > > >> > >> www.iol.unh.edu > > >> > -- Brandon Lo UNH InterOperability Laboratory 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 blo@iol.unh.edu www.iol.unh.edu