From: Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu>
To: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
Cc: "Zawadzki, Tomasz" <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>,
Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>,
"dpdklab@iol.unh.edu" <dpdklab@iol.unh.edu>,
"ci@dpdk.org" <ci@dpdk.org>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"spdk@lists.01.org" <spdk@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] [CI] SPDK compilation failures @ DPDK community lab
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 11:07:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOeXdva_KdVOqmVTWaECKTRRgWpXjX+_RuT6d5vFB5FGy3DhCw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f7th7ml5l6o.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com>
Hi everyone,
I will adjust the branches and watch over the first few pipelines to
make sure everything goes smoothly.
Thanks for the update,
Brandon
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 10:13 AM Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> "Zawadzki, Tomasz" <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com> writes:
>
> > Hi Lincoln,
> >
> >
> >
> > That patch in question is now merged to branch v21.01.x.
> >
>
> Good to know - I do still see a failure in the IOL job (even from a few
> hours ago). I suppose the lab side might need some adjustment, too?
>
> >
> > The builds performed for latest SPDK and SPDK LTS, against dpdk-main branch seem to be passing. Would love to hear if
> > this is what you are seeing on your end too.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Tomek
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>
> > Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 5:21 PM
> > To: Zawadzki, Tomasz <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
> > Cc: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>; Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu>; dpdklab@iol.unh.edu; ci@dpdk.org;
> > dev@dpdk.org; spdk@lists.01.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] [CI] SPDK compilation failures @ DPDK community lab
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks Tomek,
> >
> >
> >
> > Can you let us know when the merge happens and we'll make sure the next set of builds pass or see what the next failure
> > is. :-P
> >
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Lincoln
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:03 AM Zawadzki, Tomasz <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Aaron,
> >
> > Thank you for reporting this !
> >
> > This is an issue with rte_power now depending on rte_ethdev, which was resolved on latest SPDK.
> >
> > I believe that UNH lab verifies DPDK patches against SPDK branch for latest release. Which after the very recent SPDK
> > release, would be v21.01.x:
> > https://github.com/spdk/spdk/tree/v21.01.x
> >
> > The fix has been backported to that branch and should be merged shortly:
> > https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/6320
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tomek
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Aaron Conole
> > > Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 4:21 PM
> > > To: Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu>
> > > Cc: dpdklab@iol.unh.edu; ci@dpdk.org; dev@dpdk.org; spdk@lists.01.org
> > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [CI] SPDK compilation failures @ DPDK community lab
> > >
> > > Greetings,
> > >
> > > I've noticed that recently SPDK compilation in the UNH community lab seems
> > > to be failing, and I don't see an obvious reason for the failure.
> > > The logs haven't been too helpful - it appears that there is a symbol that isn't
> > > available when linking.
> > >
> > > Job details (for example):
> > > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/results/results-
> > > uploads/test_runs/2363efb43157465db3228c34c00ebd57/log_upload_file/20
> > > 21/2/dpdk_f6f2d2240153_15524_2021-02-04_22-59-59_NA.zip
> > >
> > > Is it possible to turn on more verbose logging during the compilation of
> > > SPDK? Maybe show the arguments to the compiler for the specific object?
> > > Maybe the SPDK folks can see something obviously wrong?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > -Aaron
>
--
Brandon Lo
UNH InterOperability Laboratory
21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824
blo@iol.unh.edu
www.iol.unh.edu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-09 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-08 15:21 [dpdk-dev] " Aaron Conole
2021-02-08 16:03 ` Zawadzki, Tomasz
2021-02-08 16:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-ci] " Lincoln Lavoie
[not found] ` <DM6PR11MB422097059AB558056B97BEC5EE8F9@DM6PR11MB4220.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2021-02-09 15:13 ` Aaron Conole
2021-02-09 16:07 ` Brandon Lo [this message]
2021-02-09 17:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdklab] " Brandon Lo
2021-02-11 14:02 ` Aaron Conole
2021-02-11 16:25 ` Brandon Lo
2021-02-12 9:18 ` Zawadzki, Tomasz
2021-02-12 17:39 ` Brandon Lo
2021-02-15 15:28 ` Aaron Conole
2021-02-17 16:06 ` Zawadzki, Tomasz
2021-02-18 13:58 ` Brandon Lo
2021-02-15 9:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [SPDK] " David Marchand
2021-02-15 9:56 ` Nick Connolly
2021-02-15 10:15 ` David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAOeXdva_KdVOqmVTWaECKTRRgWpXjX+_RuT6d5vFB5FGy3DhCw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=blo@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=ci@dpdk.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dpdklab@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=lylavoie@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=spdk@lists.01.org \
--cc=tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).