From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-la0-f54.google.com (mail-la0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31022902 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2015 11:38:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: by laeb10 with SMTP id b10so9880441lae.1 for ; Fri, 04 Sep 2015 02:38:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=cPjnJHtFWEyw2+KQknlabKncUe5Z47AySQvgfAtSsLw=; b=TpQ6rhoEIooK5vsdsY2GKnIKjGogbPhDwLqvXhQSJfQIJMLFYuvbue/egdgxFeN9VK EVZdzW0F1mpf0RYU09T0fUxHWklP1uIxEp8NNBZL0y3M3CX57HPN97YWfq88VxhMIqTE 6dLtSP6yrh0iIfmFeLDP8Z0hbahz/yuqFEEZaOX+xV86P3b52o5PZOGuYAUtuQom8DCD btRwxVfQcakPZ1w2LW/uaYyH/gdkWja4dpxlOZVsakFpqwuopRxSE+qkVn8ZeTdXyl17 sdtpNCVon6iOFAYS1U5qPW5AFFH4Ox8Fvou/iQFowtLdybHh/JxuBINay1LiS3DQEGY/ ECag== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkocJiS5DP5Zb8/7S88csTxsTtWP3+Ww1Oejc72bKrQTj/wzR2SIehmH99IDAsYX7X/kyux X-Received: by 10.112.147.135 with SMTP id tk7mr2822199lbb.100.1441359511807; Fri, 04 Sep 2015 02:38:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.170.79 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Sep 2015 02:38:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Andriy Berestovskyy Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 11:38:12 +0200 Message-ID: To: Maryam Tahhan , dev@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: [dpdk-dev] ixgbe: account more Rx errors Issue X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 09:38:32 -0000 Hi, Updating to DPDK 2.1 I noticed an issue with the ixgbe stats. In commit f6bf669b9900 "ixgbe: account more Rx errors" we add XEC hardware counter (l3_l4_xsum_error) to the ierrors now. The issue is the UDP packets with zero check sum are counted in XEC and now in ierrors too. I've tried to disable hw_ip_checksum in rxmode, but it didn't help. I'm not sure we should add XEC to ierrors, because packets counted in XEC are not dropped by the NIC actually. So in my case ierrors counter is now greater than actual number of packets received by the NIC, which makes no sense. What's your opinion? Regards, Andriy