From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f169.google.com (mail-io0-f169.google.com [209.85.223.169]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E028D9C for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 10:21:03 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-io0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 1so145550489ion.1 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 01:21:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=semihalf-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=1o2a0UeKtxLLYpxGbpmqmob+UM/vC0M5fvMcquT77g0=; b=b7zfsTOTBJdZ+wfe3g4J+f1lWO/X/aZXVCEcePsH+rzrkT+a3+8eiuM7kpWKGIDduQ 5B1JVxds/XF3xZ5oexFv3/OMxlb4j1q3eMQLAOj81oogD4vJtVGz1v6vcYsxtqqpKnN2 JA0JxdPfx1AVsgCRQcxIhJ+XzcQ/NA4bUTxhYSnZVuCf+c8k707PeeQVcxnknDpTGhBe gr1dWy7rYMa9q2K8Eb5UDyDlsLzwOv9UsIFwJ/IfOUmqoWAuuqISLO03/LItksZI+D1X 9mbxDKbjJLcSpsa1IDexw16FCw4GpNd7Bh9exeRITN0VRGQX25/hwNTOLbKSbZqdxdT1 e1IQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=1o2a0UeKtxLLYpxGbpmqmob+UM/vC0M5fvMcquT77g0=; b=A1RQFKzkrcL9n0aSWZt5N/dbOhfquFvu1cPMHCHVF4Ze0chfSC1AEJCWGxmDjbDd7T 1IxJY5yat5oph25bJHWtM4C+bGp6EOZF+rcNR4k/lAfQoUbMEDJphO+NwZ3NDWcxtGhr 1NSG5E0we0Uj4KE84g9NqlMS8gYm7oo8SL4N6E9CDLKyWN8AW45mLa+Si1ZyFuHidyag hpa2C/o/nb7oEVh+UREy3wnMNUJucujX1fjBT7aF5+24Tlck/l/iqgwpbC0NO6JhV+QV 81jwTP78BnIn3ojtMWSFXWy7KOpgZzc/CwSeC7RushBCp3na0coC+nZiTta6AsXN3Q9G ws5g== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQlEWPlOm0MaG5BJUVI8qn+Ax+mJjUwsX5Om6szwc8WI0eHOSE0p2j1m3S9NKZ/55euR5VKevhRy5N7Vw== X-Received: by 10.107.170.67 with SMTP id t64mr19567093ioe.71.1453713661487; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 01:21:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.227.161 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 01:20:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20160123024826.GB25867@mhcomputing.net> References: <56A07267.2060001@mhcomputing.net> <04C50E6A-7E6F-410F-8D07-619766863227@intel.com> <0B797DEE-FCB2-4CE0-B3A3-86560BA3ADA5@intel.com> <20160123024826.GB25867@mhcomputing.net> From: Andriy Berestovskyy Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 10:20:42 +0100 Message-ID: To: Matthew Hall , Keith Wiles Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PKTGEN] additional terminal IO question X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 09:21:03 -0000 Hi Matthew, Every software has bugs. pktgen is a great tool and we appreciate it as is. I would prefer we discuss a patch rather that questioning a functionality implemented way ago... Andriy On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 3:48 AM, Matthew Hall wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 05:35:00PM +0200, Arnon Warshavsky wrote: >> Keith, >> For the record, on my end (can only speak for myself) this is not a real >> problem. >> I work around it by using a different theme and live with it happily ever >> after. >> I just provided the input since I encountered it. >> >> /Arnon > > For me, breaking stuff with a black background to gain questionably useful > colors and/or themes seems like more overhead for cognition of the code for > not much benefit. > > This is going to break the tool people who use a Linux standard framebuffer > with no X also, isn't it? > > Matthew. -- Andriy Berestovskyy