From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8229343A9F; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 15:06:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3756141151; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 15:06:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-ed1-f46.google.com (mail-ed1-f46.google.com [209.85.208.46]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E4D41109 for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 15:06:29 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ed1-f46.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-55790581457so7808509a12.3 for ; Tue, 06 Feb 2024 06:06:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1707228388; x=1707833188; darn=dpdk.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=elqE2W48VuOsN8VE9DMNmXOKVm18hj8Hkh4LNveN5NU=; b=FI9oG00iTirdQ1GW3sX+D0LWvSyzfOp4DlSb1xSO0vTz9FZahuqpSrk5fh1/jbfGh4 QitIki1JzwJafrgZDxcmdsHtbH41jBLHboP9b1iqE0zUYpwMuZc3NLiVwNKOdFq9SapY K0lmpAOI1Aa+BRPsWstetruSZATl/nqPqFmMo2v8w+MeKYbNWcuI7kXJZElIzB4fVTS9 JNbcYqeJXYejfrJhB3+rCutd5RMA7IHiYiAAw+kuKaWyh/I13141qvb0at/CsS6SWYcB DBFoCvMnqyh5JFF+IY7lgwkb3cLc3fsdhQDsCub/hi9QUYKkgST9EWUzcS7DmG9nfcpV 5c8w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1707228388; x=1707833188; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=elqE2W48VuOsN8VE9DMNmXOKVm18hj8Hkh4LNveN5NU=; b=pBNCS+rmErrrn6sjlGeq4MqQph5hL0AMy/MKNf0jId7nVUWf7wiTmaG742yuqpsu5q U+AC3yoyyGTggHln52KdbcwHfx1D2ZRNHBTO1uhyPYMEaTO0CDNNhHEj4wd5AoqnXSkL aaJFThUUZeLfFgF2ACwNmGPGOeyifhcHHH8fgtRAeX1fhx8lMdf6y2hJiKlVr34bbtUj ngWgxLXbwe92GBPHLpKB/ymQpSWYC0ztjAqJUVyTlMedlPb1n2wM5IAnaQDK1FRZF/w5 SbBZCpQslKJ74rveoUA1XdXHY07fMS9Egx1C7cEcis4tqPi+9lFYqXFwo+hRo+zkItD8 mp5w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxxInG6X0YZ251TC/pQCl63k8sZapQh2Sk6BgFeiLiJ0ljNR7Iz U5uYwdHjP+n29KHA82vT7YsgIEgJFgvnhaaaFG5ICFLbZqnGQPKVgKhoZVDO6s11xAjRCJ5oLMG +xLZn2dFIc0KqNwxiZcN6QL3jUbRUOALKzlc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFIsv8ymHUVGCLJoXrtu7Y1TqQejoIH9mg1DkoBWyKZcdsUnbWtMASqIbamlIecqlNUwfLTNJCirYXIxWku1jA= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:2d0:b0:55f:8657:c7f6 with SMTP id b16-20020a05640202d000b0055f8657c7f6mr1914882edx.14.1707228388516; Tue, 06 Feb 2024 06:06:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Prashant Upadhyaya Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 19:36:16 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: PMD for non PCI device To: dev@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Hi, I have a usecase where I have to evaluate writing a DPDK PMD for a non PCI/e device doing the ethernet packet i/o. Wanted to know if the above usecase is supported by DPDK infra and any pointers on how one should go about writing a PMD for such a usecase if supported. Would appreciate any inputs. Regards -Prashant