From: Prashant Upadhyaya <praupadhyaya@gmail.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
Cc: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: Regarding port numbers assigned by DPDK for PCI devices
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 15:24:55 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPBAu3XE3n3xna+qgxKM+dO+ghAVjQ_DVdSWaVHq9p2ekOFFCQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e0302103-a390-48a6-aea3-2e01a31fbb1e@amd.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2981 bytes --]
On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 at 14:35, Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com> wrote:
> On 7/30/2024 6:36 AM, Prashant Upadhyaya wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 23:13, Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com
> > <mailto:dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > 2024-07-29 22:18 (UTC+0530), Prashant Upadhyaya:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have 4 ethernet interfaces available as PCI devices.
> > > The PCI addresses are known.
> > > When I start my DPDK application, it starts up properly and
> > assigns the
> > > port numbers to them as 0, 1, 2, 3 expectedly.
> > >
> > > However, is there a way I can force that a particular PCI address
> > should be
> > > identified as port 0 by DPDK, another one as port 1 and so forth ?
> > > Does passing the arguments like -a <address1> -a <address2> to
> > rte_eal_init
> > > ensure that, or is there any other way, or is there no way ?
> > >
> > > I am on 24.03
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > -Prashant
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Why do you need specific port numbers assigned to devices?
> >
> > If you're going to use devices for different purposes,
> > you'd better have an application-level configuration
> > to specify PCI addresses to use for each purpose.
> > Iterate devices to match the address and find the port number.
> >
> > It is also possible to disable automatic probing with "-a 0:0.0",
> > then to use rte_dev_probe() + rte_dev_event_callback_register()
> > to add devices and to get their port numbers.
> > However, this API, strictly speaking, does not guarantee
> > that the numbers will be assigned sequentially.
> > One advantage of using hot-plug is that you can build devargs
> > from within the application (or from configuration).
> >
> > Refer to "rte_dev.h" in any case.
> > Multiple "-a" don't work the way you've described.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks Dmitry. Ok, so if I have the port number with me, and I know it
> > corresponds to a PCI device, how do I find out the PCI address of this
> > device corresponding to this port number. I believe I can
> > do rte_eth_dev_info_get to get the struct rte_eth_dev_info and from
> > there the rte_device, but what after that ? I saw some references
> > to RTE_DEV_TO_PCI but that macro isn't available for compilation after
> > DPDK is installed as it is an internal header file and thus not a macro
> > for application usage and wouldn't compile at application level.
> >
> >
>
> Hi Prashant,
>
> For PCI bus, most of the times ethdev device name is PCI ID, so you can
> use 'rte_eth_dev_get_name_by_port(port_id, name)' API to get PCI ID for
> port.
>
> But there are cases this is not true, like single PCI ID creates
> multiple ethdev etc... for this case, PCI ID can be get from device name:
> rte_eth_dev_info_get(port_id, *dev_info)
> name = rte_dev_name(dev_info->device)
>
>
>
Thanks Ferruh, this was helpful.
Regards
-Prashant
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4140 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-31 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-29 16:48 Prashant Upadhyaya
2024-07-29 17:43 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2024-07-30 5:36 ` Prashant Upadhyaya
2024-07-30 8:15 ` Bruce Richardson
2024-07-31 9:55 ` Prashant Upadhyaya
2024-07-31 9:05 ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-07-31 9:54 ` Prashant Upadhyaya [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPBAu3XE3n3xna+qgxKM+dO+ghAVjQ_DVdSWaVHq9p2ekOFFCQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=praupadhyaya@gmail.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).