DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kamraan Nasim <knasim@sidebandnetworks.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Yuanzhang Hu <YHu@sidebandnetworks.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] Load-balancing position field in DPDK load_balancer sample app vs. Hash table
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 13:29:32 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPrTskioYqu_aad7EeepyuYb-9wDZWDOWXQpdCrD5Yofom__vA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hello,

So i've borrowed some code from the DPDK Load balancer sample application,
specifically the load balancing position(byte 29th) to determine which
worker lcore to forward the packet to.

The idea is that flow affinity should be maintained and all packets from
the same flow would have the same checksum/5-tuple value

worker_id = packet[load_balancing_field] % n_workers

Question is that how reliable is this load balancing position? I am tempted
to use Hash tables but I think this position based mechanism may be faster.

How have people's experience with this been in general?


--Kam

             reply	other threads:[~2014-11-13 18:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-13 18:29 Kamraan Nasim [this message]
2014-11-14 10:53 ` Bruce Richardson
2014-11-14 14:44 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-14 16:23   ` Yerden Zhumabekov
2014-11-14 16:50     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-14 16:55       ` Yerden Zhumabekov
2014-11-14 16:57       ` Chilikin, Andrey
2014-11-14 17:20         ` Yerden Zhumabekov
2014-11-17 10:15           ` Chilikin, Andrey
2014-11-14 18:49         ` Matt Laswell
2014-11-15  7:10           ` Yerden Zhumabekov
2014-11-15 15:28             ` Matt Laswell
2014-11-17  0:48         ` Zhang, Helin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPrTskioYqu_aad7EeepyuYb-9wDZWDOWXQpdCrD5Yofom__vA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=knasim@sidebandnetworks.com \
    --cc=YHu@sidebandnetworks.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).