From: Kamraan Nasim <knasim@sidebandnetworks.com>
To: Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Steve Noble <snoble@sidebandnetworks.com>,
Ashish Juneja <ajuneja@sidebandnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] RTE mempool "used count" steadily goes down to zero despite steady packet throughput
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 21:35:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPrTskjCycUjryY7rrNaqGFMcX=k1atw+XCnhByXb0HhGGGHmw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <547C3BB7.5010309@6wind.com>
Thanks Oliver for the helpful tip, that settles the confusion as to why
Free count grows and used shrinks.
I've modified the rte_mempool library to maintain atomic pktmbuf malloc and
free stats, hopefully that would help pinpoint the leak.
Thanks again for your help!
--Kam
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:58 AM, Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com> wrote:
> Hi Kam,
>
> On 11/28/2014 06:34 PM, Kamraan Nasim wrote:
> > I have ~15Gbps of traffic flowing through two 10GE ports and been
> profiling
> > the rte mempool(or rather the pktmbuf mempool) memory consumption:
> >
> > I have per lcore caching disabled(cache_size is 0)
> >
> > I have noticed that:
> > - Mempool FREE cnt(as given byt rte_mempool_free_count()) increases
> > - Mempool USED cnt(as given by rte_mempool_used_count() decreases and
> > eventually drops to 0. When this happens, mempool reports itself as EMPTY
> > - rx_nombuf stats for the eth ports start climbing
> > - Valgrind Memcheck does not indicate any obvious leaks in RTE mempool or
> > my application.
> >
> >
> > I was wondering if others have come across this issue? Or if people here
> > have used ways, besides Valgrind to profile the mempool or the pkt mbuf
> > pool?
>
> First, be careful with rte_mempool_free_count(): it returns the number
> of free entries in the internal ring of the mempool, which actually
> corresponds to the number of allocated objects from the mempool point
> of view. See:
> http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/tree/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h
>
> If you have the number of allocated objects increasing, and the
> statistics rx_nombuf increasing when the mbuf pool is empty, it means
> that you have a mbuf leak in your application. Valgrind won't see it
> since it does not know about mempool alloc/free functions.
>
> Regards,
> Olivier
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-02 2:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-28 17:34 Kamraan Nasim
2014-12-01 9:58 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-12-02 2:35 ` Kamraan Nasim [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAPrTskjCycUjryY7rrNaqGFMcX=k1atw+XCnhByXb0HhGGGHmw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=knasim@sidebandnetworks.com \
--cc=ajuneja@sidebandnetworks.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=snoble@sidebandnetworks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).