From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sambath.balasubramanian@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-vb0-x229.google.com (mail-vb0-x229.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c02::229])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDF30156
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 23:36:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-vb0-f41.google.com with SMTP id w8so169060vbj.14
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 14:37:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=Po17UkrZUg79ux6ifPyvpxa1bV9XJf/qzIYXVQuQN68=;
 b=j5tmTmM5zYPfntDLkMoAryyxR0EekQWu+RhRLtLnTs3LgtrYFJvhhPTGhdEgWpyOo/
 Lp9Tk/sXm+/Ay4lnJj8VN+To+UlBf3kdb7HieijCmnmJhJUdbhs4kxDDj7svvvJ1OatP
 fRZPjeZmROhDs7/HZNvScdEYjK2tfuGtI9CB3SEF20Qq/l2BpIFZXOOvEvkPpvpZ5iYu
 Zw5PFduJMP1vHk9/LpBVyu3Tj4+8hfIU/CMOkFEnei7pyBgJpqAHbcwz9yA2v2Pcaz78
 WzMcNh6cbpqJ5NC1JZvk2ja0z4f0dt3i8WcZSSyAt4vkozX3O60uIIyjNIGI8xYUc19p
 2mVw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.27.243 with SMTP id w19mr3307196vdg.3.1381959465726; Wed,
 16 Oct 2013 14:37:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.24.15 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 14:37:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CANDrEH=CJKEKhFP0mivZMfX-3f5UHVUcbss=KWhuw=LL0Ecoxg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPrcauMkHjNkOxGK7nn55iicJ6R7=hduOPnM+e5ut1EoL6dYBQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANDrEH=CJKEKhFP0mivZMfX-3f5UHVUcbss=KWhuw=LL0Ecoxg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 14:37:45 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPrcauNSFTRH=iqc1e2atBQxRJxypqRKp8QvE-mdM7M8qH_UGA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Sambath Kumar Balasubramanian <sambath.balasubramanian@gmail.com>
To: Vladimir Medvedkin <medvedkinv@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Multiple LCore receiving from same port/queue
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 21:36:59 -0000

Thanks Stephen and Vladimir. Appreciate the quick response.

Thanks,
Sambath


On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Vladimir Medvedkin <medvedkinv@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> By default, you can't poll same queue on same port from different lcores.
> If you need poll same queue on several lcores use locks to avoid race
> conditions.
>
>
> 2013/10/17 Sambath Kumar Balasubramanian <
> sambath.balasubramanian@gmail.com>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>   I have a test dpdk application with 2 lcores receiving packets
>> using rte_eth_rx_burst API. Is this a supported packet processing model.
>> The reason I am asking is I am running into some trouble with this model.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sambath
>>
>
>