From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io1-f65.google.com (mail-io1-f65.google.com [209.85.166.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 799F41AFF for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 13:52:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-io1-f65.google.com with SMTP id q4-v6so17333561iob.8 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 04:52:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=semihalf-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nXxnKxNAK0onWz1/bGgK6As3be2qY0RH+mwKJwuFVCU=; b=KeueUsnnuD3qmYGiTS/m6zJlzxEhEq+rHdjX4Ddkm/X1nG+MGjuJqbUvX04JIy2d0O umYW1k4hibSmpoK48cz+CkIgyMYEHiwxKSLWzhPIqeXFXjCrBtvu6/tZ0WeALNXjq2/Z FGdp/Sb1r3fbdYORL+fy3MZOJqvnuL3puhocHx6HtFLiBinTguh29Wf9vnPaOa0uThbd yiY9RXEvuJCA4VnxAlGFehh6b0ikccgE0fxHcJ412jrSUovhRR/VBHfIwHDSOZm/UUgR cpOAs4zFAMblHHyaKFo7tJzY5IT0atpelRUiP14VvYS94jGJ9pNEX9aq48x58GDK3pMm BOfQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nXxnKxNAK0onWz1/bGgK6As3be2qY0RH+mwKJwuFVCU=; b=e2Yg9UytVUlfDbXddvxLtkj2xb9wiK/WQLWJ8tQpzTArir3DL8o7KGHp2JBalpcFXs BNnmYPXzU8ahJ6S0bF47ezHn5dBPukx/higSt0DTVMk5XaktEzeWbMc8TpcyvGDHcI9F a76pICwOB0PdMtClZEeX1smb4wB+1K3RKCndzfkb4WQhLIwXlDNtZn65oh1UXnDwWlVu ypeQlhcscfTy1ZAG+q6V/mTWW5RlQZPWVQpcLNoZHLJhqp0ObE7l+CwprEUz2zn+KivT hoG1K8rZeY2sNDRzDGEKrko4/eCr/UfWAcvqKDlqbyPYG5X+JCgz1wKde4aut8mCAu6w blcg== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfogZtWnjZ5YzZX0nNQ8FWFhrUfOaxhjVbS9vXbqBlHpRfYcfPs9Q m+A0YTnPDKXV4hUuPmcA/H93cyvja2NdAXIVEqI87Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV60RWN457mQUQy6RgSh8i9LKw4HwzhzmFDyUvVtpKMbWwT+CSSkaBU/S/U7U4FKV85XYfCW/zDBS1vvyrxm/6Pc= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:b74d:: with SMTP id h74-v6mr7555164iof.248.1537789934779; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 04:52:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1536045016-32008-1-git-send-email-tdu@semihalf.com> <1536068953-9352-11-git-send-email-tdu@semihalf.com> <10679582.IxOl8a41ax@xps> <03d2129a-2ceb-a483-cc22-ed354751a13f@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <03d2129a-2ceb-a483-cc22-ed354751a13f@intel.com> From: Marcin Wojtas Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 13:51:56 +0200 Message-ID: To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: thomas@monjalon.net, =?UTF-8?Q?Tomasz_Duszy=C5=84ski?= , Natalie Samsonov , dev@dpdk.org, Andrzej Ostruszka Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 10/12] net/mvpp2: align documentation with MUSDK 18.09 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 11:52:15 -0000 Hi Ferruh, pon., 24 wrz 2018 o 13:38 Ferruh Yigit napisa=C5= =82(a): > > On 9/23/2018 11:40 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 19/09/2018 19:15, Ferruh Yigit: > >> On 9/4/2018 2:49 PM, Tomasz Duszynski wrote: > >>> From: Natalie Samsonov > >>> --- a/doc/guides/nics/mvpp2.rst > >>> +++ b/doc/guides/nics/mvpp2.rst > >>> - git clone https://github.com/MarvellEmbeddedProcessors/linux-ma= rvell.git -b linux-4.4.52-armada-17.10 > >>> + git clone https://github.com/MarvellEmbeddedProcessors/linux-ma= rvell.git -b linux-4.4.120-armada-18.09 > >> > >> There is a strict dependency to MUSDK 18.09, dpdk18.11 won't compile w= ith older > >> versions. It is hard to trace this dependency, what do you think havin= g a matrix > >> in DPDK documentation showing which DPDK version supports which MUSDK? > > > > It does not compile even with MUSDK 18.09. > > > > With MUSDK 18.09, the error is: > > drivers/crypto/mvsam/rte_mrvl_pmd.c:867:26: error: 'SAM_HW_RING_N= UM' undeclared > > I confirm same error. I wasn't building with crypto PMD enabled so not ca= ught it. > > > > > The explanation is in MUSDK: > > commit 9bf8b3ca4ddfa00619c0023dfb08ae1601054fce > > Author: Dmitri Epshtein > > Date: Mon Nov 20 10:38:31 2017 +0200 > > > > sam: remove SAM_HW_RING_NUM from APIs > > > > Use function: > > u32 sam_get_num_cios(u32 inst); > > > > As a consequence, next-net cannot be pulled! > > Got it, should I drop the patchset from tree? We're checking the error and will provide fix asap. Please let know if this should be another version of the entire patchset or fix on top. Sorry for the problems. Best regards, Marcin