DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Loftus, Ciara" <ciara.loftus@intel.com>
To: "Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] net/af_xdp: re-enable secondary process support
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 07:41:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CO1PR11MB47857C8A903E22B3AECB59958E2E9@CO1PR11MB4785.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8111a253-5eb9-2925-1c17-e37a68381527@intel.com>

> 
> On 2/8/2022 6:42 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 18:00:27 +0000
> > Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 2/8/2022 5:45 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >>> On Tue,  8 Feb 2022 13:48:00 +0000
> >>> Ciara Loftus <ciara.loftus@intel.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +- **Secondary Processes**
> >>>> +
> >>>> +  Rx and Tx are not supported for secondary processes due to the
> single-producer
> >>>> +  single-consumer nature of the AF_XDP rings. However other
> operations including
> >>>> +  statistics retrieval are permitted.
> >>>> +  The maximum number of queues permitted for PMDs operating in
> this model is 8
> >>>> +  as this is the maximum number of fds that can be sent through the
> IPC APIs as
> >>>> +  defined by RTE_MP_MAX_FD_NUM.
> >>>> +
> >>>
> >>> This seems like a restriction that is true for most devices in DPDK.
> >>> Most other devices also have restriction that on queues;
> >>> the hardware descriptor ring can only be used by one thread at a time.
> >>> Is this different with AF_XDP?
> >>
> >> I asked the same on v2 :) and Ciara explained the reason, it is on v2
> discussion thread.
> >
> > The wording of the message is what confused me.
> > It would be better to change:
> >      due to the single-producer single-consumer nature of the AF_XDP rings
> > to
> >      due to memory mapping of the AF_XDP rings being assigned by the
> kernel
> >      in the primary process only.
> 
> +1

Agree, I worded this poorly! Will submit a v4 with a more accurate explanation of the limitation.

Thanks,
Ciara

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-09  7:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-10 15:32 [RFC PATCH] net/af_xdp: reenable " Ciara Loftus
2021-12-11 21:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-01-12  7:54 ` [PATCH] net/af_xdp: re-enable " Ciara Loftus
2022-02-04 12:54   ` [PATCH v2] " Ciara Loftus
2022-02-04 14:18     ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-07  7:49       ` Loftus, Ciara
2022-02-07 10:27         ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-07 11:39           ` Loftus, Ciara
2022-02-08 10:58             ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-08 13:48     ` [PATCH v3] " Ciara Loftus
2022-02-08 17:45       ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-02-08 18:00         ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-08 18:42           ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-02-08 18:56             ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-09  7:41               ` Loftus, Ciara [this message]
2022-02-09  9:48       ` [PATCH v4] " Ciara Loftus
2022-02-09 15:29         ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-02-11 13:32           ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-09 17:55         ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-10 15:08           ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-10 15:19         ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-10 15:40           ` Loftus, Ciara
2022-02-10 16:06             ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-10 17:47               ` Loftus, Ciara
2022-02-10 20:12                 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-11  7:28                   ` Loftus, Ciara
2022-02-11  9:26                     ` Loftus, Ciara
2022-02-11 12:29                       ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-11 13:01                         ` Loftus, Ciara
2022-02-11 13:07                           ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-11 15:32                             ` Loftus, Ciara
2022-02-16 11:23                               ` Loftus, Ciara
2022-02-11 11:31                     ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-17 12:44         ` David Marchand
2022-02-17 12:47           ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-17 12:53             ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CO1PR11MB47857C8A903E22B3AECB59958E2E9@CO1PR11MB4785.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=ciara.loftus@intel.com \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).