DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kusztal, ArkadiuszX" <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>
To: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>,
	"Zhang, Roy Fan" <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [EXT] [PATCH 04/40] cryptodev: reduce number of comments in asym xform
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 17:37:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CO1PR11MB5009019E8CF77458128852C69FD79@CO1PR11MB5009.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR18MB4491F373A0D915394098B873D8D79@PH0PR18MB4491.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2022 12:59 PM
> To: Kusztal, ArkadiuszX <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>; Zhang, Roy Fan
> <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [EXT] [PATCH 04/40] cryptodev: reduce number of comments in
> asym xform
> 
> > - Reduced number of comments in asymmetric xform.
> > Information describing basic functionality of well known algorithms
> > are unnecessary.
> > - Added information about data memory lifetime.
> > It was specified how user should work with private data, and it is
> > user's responsability to clear it.
> > - Removed NONE asymetric xform.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arek Kusztal <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  lib/cryptodev/rte_crypto_asym.h | 45 +++++++++++++----------------------------
> >  lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c   |  1 -
> >  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/cryptodev/rte_crypto_asym.h
> > b/lib/cryptodev/rte_crypto_asym.h index a474b6acd1..0251e8caae 100644
> > --- a/lib/cryptodev/rte_crypto_asym.h
> > +++ b/lib/cryptodev/rte_crypto_asym.h
> > @@ -55,46 +55,29 @@ enum rte_crypto_curve_id {  };
> >
> >  /**
> > - * Asymmetric crypto transformation types.
> > - * Each xform type maps to one asymmetric algorithm
> > - * performing specific operation
> > - *
> > + * Asymmetric crypto algorithm static data.
> > + * Data that may be used more than once (e.g. RSA private key).
> > + * It is the USER responsibility to keep track of private data memory
> > + * lifetime and security of the this data in xform. The same way
> > + * it is the USER responsibility to call cryptodev session_clear()
> > + * function if a session was created. If session-less not used
> > + * xform data should be cleared after successful session creation.
> >   */
> >  enum rte_crypto_asym_xform_type {
> > -	RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_UNSPECIFIED = 0,
> > +	RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_UNSPECIFIED,
> >  	/**< Invalid xform. */
> > -	RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_NONE,
> > -	/**< Xform type None.
> > -	 * May be supported by PMD to support
> > -	 * passthrough op for debugging purpose.
> > -	 * if xform_type none , op_type is disregarded.
> > -	 */
> I believe removing this is not a good idea. As stated, it will help in Debugging.
> 
> >  	RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_RSA,
> > -	/**< RSA. Performs Encrypt, Decrypt, Sign and Verify.
> > -	 * Refer to rte_crypto_asym_op_type
> > -	 */
> > +	/**< RSA */
> >  	RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_DH,
> > -	/**< Diffie-Hellman.
> > -	 * Performs Key Generate and Shared Secret Compute.
> > -	 * Refer to rte_crypto_asym_op_type
> > -	 */
> > +	/**< Diffie-Hellman */
> >  	RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_DSA,
> > -	/**< Digital Signature Algorithm
> > -	 * Performs Signature Generation and Verification.
> > -	 * Refer to rte_crypto_asym_op_type
> > -	 */
> > +	/**< Digital Signature Algorithm */
> >  	RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_MODINV,
> > -	/**< Modular Multiplicative Inverse
> > -	 * Perform Modular Multiplicative Inverse b^(-1) mod n
> > -	 */
> > +	/**< Modular Multiplicative Inverse */
> >  	RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_MODEX,
> > -	/**< Modular Exponentiation
> > -	 * Perform Modular Exponentiation b^e mod n
> > -	 */
> > +	/**< Modular Exponentiation */
> >  	RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_ECDSA,
> > -	/**< Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm
> > -	 * Perform Signature Generation and Verification.
> > -	 */
> > +	/**< Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm */
> >  	RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_ECPM
[Arek] - maybe this is not that important but could not we have asym_algorithm instead of xform_type? There is not ECDSA/ECPM xform at all.
> >  	/**< Elliptic Curve Point Multiplication */  }; diff --git
> > a/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c b/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c index
> > e16e6802aa..691625bd04 100644
> > --- a/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
> > +++ b/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
> > @@ -160,7 +160,6 @@ rte_crypto_aead_operation_strings[] = {
> >   * Asymmetric crypto transform operation strings identifiers.
> >   */
> >  const char *rte_crypto_asym_xform_strings[] = {
> > -	[RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_NONE]	= "none",
> >  	[RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_RSA]	= "rsa",
> >  	[RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_MODEX]	= "modexp",
> >  	[RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_MODINV]	= "modinv",
> > --
> > 2.13.6


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-24 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-20  5:54 [PATCH 00/40] cryptodev: rsa, dh, ecdh changes Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 01/40] cryptodev: redefine ec group enum Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 02/40] cryptodev: remove list end enumerators Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  7:19   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 03/40] test/crypto: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 04/40] cryptodev: reduce number of comments in asym xform Arek Kusztal
2022-05-24 10:59   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24 17:37     ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX [this message]
2022-05-25  5:44       ` Akhil Goyal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 05/40] test/crypto: removed asym xform none Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 06/40] cryptodev: separate key exchange operation enum Arek Kusztal
2022-05-24 11:45   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 07/40] crypto/openssl: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 08/40] test/crypto: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  7:18   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 09/40] cryptodev: remove unnecessary zero assignement Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  7:13   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 10/40] cryptodev: remove comment about using ephemeral key in dsa Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 11/40] cryptodev: remove asym crypto next xform Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  7:22   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24 11:12   ` Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24 14:47     ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-25  6:06       ` Akhil Goyal
2022-05-25  6:36         ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-25  7:05           ` Anoob Joseph
2022-05-27  6:30             ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-27  6:40               ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-27  6:55                 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-27  7:27                   ` Anoob Joseph
2022-05-27  7:47                     ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 12/40] crypto/openssl: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 13/40] test/crypto: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  7:24   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-20  7:38     ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 14/40] app/test-crypto-perf: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 15/40] app/test-eventdev: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  7:25   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 16/40] cryptodev: move dh type from xform to dh op Arek Kusztal
2022-05-24 11:52   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 17/40] crypto/openssl: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 18/40] test/crypto: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 19/40] cryptodev: changed order of dh fields Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 20/40] cryptodev: add elliptic curve diffie hellman Arek Kusztal
2022-05-24 12:08   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24 14:52     ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-24 14:55       ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-25  6:02         ` Akhil Goyal
2022-05-25  6:33           ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 21/40] cryptodev: add public key verify option Arek Kusztal
2022-05-24 12:12   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24 14:59     ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-25  6:00       ` Akhil Goyal
2022-05-25  6:30         ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 22/40] cryptodev: move RSA padding into separate struct Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 23/40] crypto/qat: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 24/40] crypto/openssl: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 25/40] crypto/octeontx: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 26/40] crypto/cnxk: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 27/40] common/cpt: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 28/40] test/crypto: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 29/40] cryptodev: add salt length and optional label Arek Kusztal
2022-05-24 12:30   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24 15:14     ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-25  5:57       ` Akhil Goyal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 30/40] cryptodev: reduce rsa struct to only necessary fields Arek Kusztal
2022-05-24 12:52   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24 15:33     ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-25  5:48       ` Akhil Goyal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 31/40] crypto/qat: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 32/40] crypto/openssl: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 33/40] crypto/octeontx: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 34/40] crypto/cnxk: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 35/40] common/cpt: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 36/40] test/crypto: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 37/40] cryptodev: add asym op flags Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20 12:07   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 38/40] cryptodev: clarify usage of private key in dh Arek Kusztal
2022-05-24 12:56   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24 14:30     ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-25  6:09       ` Akhil Goyal
2022-05-25  6:37         ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 39/40] crypto/openssl: generate dh private key Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  5:54 ` [PATCH 40/40] test/crypto: added test for dh priv key generation Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20  7:30 ` [EXT] [PATCH 00/40] cryptodev: rsa, dh, ecdh changes Akhil Goyal
2022-05-20  7:37   ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CO1PR11MB5009019E8CF77458128852C69FD79@CO1PR11MB5009.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com \
    --cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
    --cc=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).