From: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
To: Arek Kusztal <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "roy.fan.zhang@intel.com" <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [EXT] [PATCH v4 0/3] cryptodev: move dh type from xform to dh op
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 15:57:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CO6PR18MB448416427BD8CF9B34EB4FDBD8FA9@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220427074400.2091-1-arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>
Hi Arek,
> Operation type (PUBLIC_KEY_GENERATION, SHARED_SECRET) should
> be free to choose for any operation. One xform/session should
> be enough to perform both DH operations, if op_type would be xform
> member, session would have to be to be created twice for the same
> group. Similar problem would be observed in sessionless case.
> Additionally, it will help extend DH to support Elliptic Curves.
>
rte_crypto_asym_op_type is moved to rte_crypto_dh_op_param.
But why not move to rte_crypto_asym_op? I see that in other ops also,
Op_type is there, we can move that out. Right?
Also, I see one more potential issue.
There is a union of various ops in rte_crypto_asym_op, but how will
User identify which one to use. There should be a union to identify which
Struct to choose from.
> v4:
> - changed op_type coment
> - added openssl fix
>
> Arek Kusztal (3):
> cryptodev: move dh type from xform to dh op
> crypto/openssl: move dh type from xform to dh op
> test/crypto: move dh type from xform to dh op
>
> app/test/test_cryptodev_asym.c | 11 +++---
> drivers/crypto/openssl/rte_openssl_pmd.c | 54 ++--------------------------
> drivers/crypto/openssl/rte_openssl_pmd_ops.c | 26 --------------
> lib/cryptodev/rte_crypto_asym.h | 14 ++++----
> 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.13.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-27 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-27 7:43 Arek Kusztal
2022-04-27 7:43 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] " Arek Kusztal
2022-04-27 8:11 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-05-10 9:26 ` Ji, Kai
2022-04-27 7:43 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] crypto/openssl: " Arek Kusztal
2022-04-27 8:11 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-04-27 7:44 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] test/crypto: " Arek Kusztal
2022-04-27 8:12 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-04-27 8:12 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] cryptodev: " Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-04-27 15:57 ` Akhil Goyal [this message]
2022-04-29 6:25 ` [EXT] " Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-06 12:05 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-10 9:43 ` Ji, Kai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CO6PR18MB448416427BD8CF9B34EB4FDBD8FA9@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
--to=gakhil@marvell.com \
--cc=arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).