From: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
To: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>,
"radu.nicolau@intel.com" <radu.nicolau@intel.com>,
"declan.doherty@intel.com" <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
"hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
"matan@nvidia.com" <matan@nvidia.com>,
"konstantin.ananyev@intel.com" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>,
"ferruh.yigit@intel.com" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH] RFC: ethdev: add reassembly offload
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2021 13:14:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CO6PR18MB4484168B2641E31F589C3238D8CA9@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9ceeb864-f750-8b0b-624b-5f83c79a466e@oktetlabs.ru>
> On 8/23/21 1:02 PM, Akhil Goyal wrote:
> > Reassembly is a costly operation if it is done in
> > software, however, if it is offloaded to HW, it can
> > considerably save application cycles.
> > The operation becomes even more costlier if IP fragmants
> > are encrypted.
> >
> > To resolve above two issues, a new offload
> > DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_REASSEMBLY is introduced in ethdev for
> > devices which can attempt reassembly of packets in hardware.
> > rte_eth_dev_info is added with the reassembly capabilities
> > which a device can support.
> > Now, if IP fragments are encrypted, reassembly can also be
> > attempted while doing inline IPsec processing.
> > This is controlled by a flag in rte_security_ipsec_sa_options
> > to enable reassembly of encrypted IP fragments in the inline
> > path.
> >
> > The resulting reassembled packet would be a typical
> > segmented mbuf in case of success.
> >
> > And if reassembly of fragments is failed or is incomplete (if
> > fragments do not come before the reass_timeout), the mbuf is
> > updated with an ol_flag PKT_RX_REASSEMBLY_INCOMPLETE and
> > mbuf is returned as is. Now application may decide the fate
> > of the packet to wait more for fragments to come or drop.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
>
> Is it IPv4 only or IPv6 as well? I guess IPv4 only to start
> with. If so, I think offload name should say so. See below.
>
We can update spec for both and update capabilities for both.
See below.
> I'd say that the feature should be added to
> doc/guides/nics/features.rst
OK will update in next version
>
> Do we really need RX_REASSEMBLY_INCOMPLETE if we provide
> buffered packets for incomplete reassembly anyway?
> I guess it is sufficient to cover simply reassembly case
> only in HW when there is no overlapping fragments etc.
> Everything else should be handled in SW anyway as without
> the offload support at all.
>
In that case, application would need to again parse the packet
to check whether it is a fragment or not even when the reassembly
is not required. However, we would consider your suggestion in
implementation.
> > ---
> > lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c | 1 +
> > lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
> > lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_core.h | 3 ++-
> > lib/security/rte_security.h | 10 ++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> > index 9d95cd11e1..1ab3a093cf 100644
> > --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> > @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ static const struct {
> > RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(VLAN_FILTER),
> > RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(VLAN_EXTEND),
> > RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(JUMBO_FRAME),
> > + RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(REASSEMBLY),
> > RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(SCATTER),
> > RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(TIMESTAMP),
> > RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(SECURITY),
> > diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> > index d2b27c351f..e89a4dc1eb 100644
> > --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> > +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> > @@ -1360,6 +1360,7 @@ struct rte_eth_conf {
> > #define DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_FILTER 0x00000200
> > #define DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_EXTEND 0x00000400
> > #define DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_JUMBO_FRAME 0x00000800
> > +#define DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_REASSEMBLY 0x00001000
>
> I think it should be:
> RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_REASSEMBLY
>
> i.e. have correct prefix similar to
> RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_BUFFER_SPLIT and mention IPv4.
>
> If we'd like to cover IPv6 as well, it could be
> RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_IP_REASSEMBLY and have IPv4/6
> support bits in the offload capabilities below.
Intention is to update spec for both.
Will update the capabilities accordingly to have both IPv4 and IPv6.
>
> > #define DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_SCATTER 0x00002000
> > /**
> > * Timestamp is set by the driver in
> RTE_MBUF_DYNFIELD_TIMESTAMP_NAME
> > @@ -1477,6 +1478,20 @@ struct rte_eth_dev_portconf {
> > */
> > #define RTE_ETH_DEV_SWITCH_DOMAIN_ID_INVALID
> (UINT16_MAX)
> >
> > +/**
> > + * Reassembly capabilities that a device can support.
> > + * The device which can support reassembly offload should set
> > + * DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_REASSEMBLY
> > + */
> > +struct rte_eth_reass_capa {
> > + /** Maximum time in ns that a fragment can wait for further
> fragments */
> > + uint64_t reass_timeout;
> > + /** Maximum number of fragments that device can reassemble */
> > + uint16_t max_frags;
> > + /** Reserved for future capabilities */
> > + uint16_t reserved[3];
> > +};
> > +
> > /**
> > * Ethernet device associated switch information
> > */
> > @@ -1582,8 +1597,9 @@ struct rte_eth_dev_info {
> > * embedded managed interconnect/switch.
> > */
> > struct rte_eth_switch_info switch_info;
> > + /* Reassembly capabilities of a device for reassembly offload */
> > + struct rte_eth_reass_capa reass_capa;
> >
> > - uint64_t reserved_64s[2]; /**< Reserved for future fields */
> > void *reserved_ptrs[2]; /**< Reserved for future fields */
> > };
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_core.h b/lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_core.h
> > index bb38d7f581..cea25c87f7 100644
> > --- a/lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_core.h
> > +++ b/lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_core.h
> > @@ -200,10 +200,11 @@ extern "C" {
> > #define PKT_RX_OUTER_L4_CKSUM_BAD (1ULL << 21)
> > #define PKT_RX_OUTER_L4_CKSUM_GOOD (1ULL << 22)
> > #define PKT_RX_OUTER_L4_CKSUM_INVALID ((1ULL << 21) | (1ULL << 22))
> > +#define PKT_RX_REASSEMBLY_INCOMPLETE (1ULL << 23)
>
> In accordance with deprecation notice it should be
> RTE_MBUF_F_RX_REASSEMBLY_INCOMPLETE
>
Ok will correct in next version.
> >
> > /* add new RX flags here, don't forget to update PKT_FIRST_FREE */
> >
> > -#define PKT_FIRST_FREE (1ULL << 23)
> > +#define PKT_FIRST_FREE (1ULL << 24)
> > #define PKT_LAST_FREE (1ULL << 40)
> >
> > /* add new TX flags here, don't forget to update PKT_LAST_FREE */
> > diff --git a/lib/security/rte_security.h b/lib/security/rte_security.h
> > index 88d31de0a6..364eeb5cd4 100644
> > --- a/lib/security/rte_security.h
> > +++ b/lib/security/rte_security.h
> > @@ -181,6 +181,16 @@ struct rte_security_ipsec_sa_options {
> > * * 0: Disable per session security statistics collection for this SA.
> > */
> > uint32_t stats : 1;
> > +
> > + /** Enable reassembly on incoming packets.
> > + *
> > + * * 1: Enable driver to try reassembly of encrypted IP packets for
> > + * this SA, if supported by the driver. This feature will work
> > + * only if rx_offload DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_REASSEMBLY is set in
> > + * inline ethernet device.
>
> ethernet -> Ethernet
>
> > + * * 0: Disable reassembly of packets (default).
> > + */
> > + uint32_t reass_en : 1;
> > };
> >
> > /** IPSec security association direction */
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-29 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 184+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-23 10:02 [dpdk-dev] " Akhil Goyal
2021-08-23 10:18 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-08-29 13:14 ` Akhil Goyal [this message]
2021-09-21 19:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Thomas Monjalon
2021-09-07 8:47 ` [dpdk-dev] " Ferruh Yigit
2021-09-08 10:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Anoob Joseph
2021-09-13 6:56 ` Xu, Rosen
2021-09-13 7:22 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-09-14 5:14 ` Anoob Joseph
2021-09-08 6:34 ` [dpdk-dev] " Xu, Rosen
2021-09-08 6:36 ` Xu, Rosen
2022-01-03 15:08 ` [PATCH 0/8] ethdev: introduce IP " Akhil Goyal
2022-01-03 15:08 ` [PATCH 1/8] " Akhil Goyal
2022-01-11 16:03 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2022-01-22 7:38 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-01-30 16:53 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-01-03 15:08 ` [PATCH 2/8] ethdev: add dev op for IP reassembly configuration Akhil Goyal
2022-01-11 16:09 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2022-01-11 18:54 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-01-12 10:22 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2022-01-12 10:32 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-01-12 10:48 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2022-01-12 11:06 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-01-13 13:31 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-01-13 14:41 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2022-01-03 15:08 ` [PATCH 3/8] ethdev: add mbuf dynfield for incomplete IP reassembly Akhil Goyal
2022-01-11 17:04 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2022-01-11 18:44 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-01-12 10:30 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2022-01-12 10:59 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-01-13 22:29 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2022-01-13 13:18 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-01-13 14:36 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2022-01-13 15:04 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-01-03 15:08 ` [PATCH 4/8] security: add IPsec option for " Akhil Goyal
2022-01-03 15:08 ` [PATCH 5/8] app/test: add unit cases for inline IPsec offload Akhil Goyal
2022-01-20 16:48 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] app/test: add inline IPsec and reassembly cases Akhil Goyal
2022-01-20 16:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] app/test: add unit cases for inline IPsec offload Akhil Goyal
2022-01-20 16:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] app/test: add IP reassembly case with no frags Akhil Goyal
2022-01-20 16:48 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] app/test: add IP reassembly cases with multiple fragments Akhil Goyal
2022-01-20 16:48 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] app/test: add IP reassembly negative cases Akhil Goyal
2022-02-17 17:23 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] app/test: add inline IPsec and reassembly cases Akhil Goyal
2022-02-17 17:23 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] app/test: add unit cases for inline IPsec offload Akhil Goyal
2022-02-17 17:23 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] app/test: add IP reassembly case with no frags Akhil Goyal
2022-02-17 17:23 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] app/test: add IP reassembly cases with multiple fragments Akhil Goyal
2022-02-17 17:23 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] app/test: add IP reassembly negative cases Akhil Goyal
2022-04-16 19:25 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] app/test: add inline IPsec and reassembly cases Akhil Goyal
2022-04-16 19:25 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] app/test: add unit cases for inline IPsec offload Akhil Goyal
2022-04-16 19:25 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] test/security: add inline inbound IPsec cases Akhil Goyal
2022-04-16 19:25 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] test/security: add combined mode inline " Akhil Goyal
2022-04-16 19:25 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] test/security: add inline IPsec reassembly cases Akhil Goyal
2022-04-16 19:25 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] test/security: add more inline IPsec functional cases Akhil Goyal
2022-04-16 19:25 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] test/security: add ESN and anti-replay cases for inline Akhil Goyal
2022-04-16 19:25 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] ethdev: add IPsec SA expiry event subtypes Akhil Goyal
2022-04-19 8:58 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-04-19 10:14 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-04-19 10:19 ` Anoob Joseph
2022-04-19 10:37 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-04-19 10:39 ` Anoob Joseph
2022-04-19 10:47 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-04-19 12:27 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-04-19 15:41 ` Ray Kinsella
2022-04-20 13:51 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-09-24 13:57 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] Add and test IPsec SA expiry events Akhil Goyal
2022-09-24 13:57 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] ethdev: add IPsec SA expiry event subtypes Akhil Goyal
2022-09-24 14:02 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-09-26 14:02 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-09-27 18:44 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-09-24 13:57 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] test/security: add inline IPsec SA soft expiry cases Akhil Goyal
2022-09-24 13:57 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] test/security: add inline IPsec SA hard " Akhil Goyal
2022-09-26 17:07 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] Add and test IPsec SA expiry events Akhil Goyal
2022-09-26 17:07 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] ethdev: add IPsec SA expiry event subtypes Akhil Goyal
2022-09-26 17:07 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] test/security: add inline IPsec SA soft expiry cases Akhil Goyal
2022-09-26 17:07 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] test/security: add inline IPsec SA hard " Akhil Goyal
2022-04-16 19:25 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] test/security: add inline IPsec SA soft " Akhil Goyal
2022-04-16 19:25 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] test/security: add inline IPsec SA hard " Akhil Goyal
2022-04-16 19:25 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] test/security: add inline IPsec IPv6 flow label cases Akhil Goyal
2022-04-18 3:44 ` Anoob Joseph
2022-04-18 3:55 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-04-25 12:38 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] app/test: add inline IPsec and reassembly cases Poczatek, Jakub
2022-04-27 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 0/7] " Akhil Goyal
2022-04-27 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] app/test: add unit cases for inline IPsec offload Akhil Goyal
2022-04-27 15:44 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-04-27 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] test/security: add inline inbound IPsec cases Akhil Goyal
2022-04-27 15:44 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-04-27 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] test/security: add combined mode inline " Akhil Goyal
2022-04-27 15:45 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-04-27 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] test/security: add inline IPsec reassembly cases Akhil Goyal
2022-04-27 15:45 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-04-27 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] test/security: add more inline IPsec functional cases Akhil Goyal
2022-04-27 15:46 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-04-27 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] test/security: add ESN and anti-replay cases for inline Akhil Goyal
2022-04-27 15:46 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-04-28 5:25 ` Anoob Joseph
2022-04-27 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] test/security: add inline IPsec IPv6 flow label cases Akhil Goyal
2022-04-27 15:46 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-04-27 15:42 ` [PATCH v5 0/7] app/test: add inline IPsec and reassembly cases Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-05-13 7:31 ` [PATCH v6 " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-13 7:31 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] app/test: add unit cases for inline IPsec offload Akhil Goyal
2022-05-13 7:31 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] test/security: add inline inbound IPsec cases Akhil Goyal
2022-05-13 7:31 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] test/security: add combined mode inline " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-13 7:31 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] test/security: add inline IPsec reassembly cases Akhil Goyal
2022-05-13 7:31 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] test/security: add more inline IPsec functional cases Akhil Goyal
2022-05-13 7:32 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] test/security: add ESN and anti-replay cases for inline Akhil Goyal
2022-05-13 7:32 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] test/security: add inline IPsec IPv6 flow label cases Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24 7:22 ` [PATCH v7 0/7] app/test: add inline IPsec and reassembly cases Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24 7:22 ` [PATCH v7 1/7] app/test: add unit cases for inline IPsec offload Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24 7:22 ` [PATCH v7 2/7] test/security: add inline inbound IPsec cases Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24 7:22 ` [PATCH v7 3/7] test/security: add combined mode inline " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24 7:22 ` [PATCH v7 4/7] test/security: add inline IPsec reassembly cases Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24 7:22 ` [PATCH v7 5/7] test/security: add more inline IPsec functional cases Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24 7:22 ` [PATCH v7 6/7] test/security: add ESN and anti-replay cases for inline Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24 7:22 ` [PATCH v7 7/7] test/security: add inline IPsec IPv6 flow label cases Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24 8:05 ` [PATCH v7 0/7] app/test: add inline IPsec and reassembly cases Anoob Joseph
2022-05-24 9:38 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-01-03 15:08 ` [PATCH 6/8] app/test: add IP reassembly case with no frags Akhil Goyal
2022-01-03 15:08 ` [PATCH 7/8] app/test: add IP reassembly cases with multiple fragments Akhil Goyal
2022-01-03 15:08 ` [PATCH 8/8] app/test: add IP reassembly negative cases Akhil Goyal
2022-01-06 9:51 ` [PATCH 0/8] ethdev: introduce IP reassembly offload David Marchand
2022-01-06 9:54 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-01-20 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] " Akhil Goyal
2022-01-20 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] " Akhil Goyal
2022-01-20 16:45 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-01-20 17:11 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-01-20 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] ethdev: add dev op to set/get IP reassembly configuration Akhil Goyal
2022-01-22 8:17 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-01-30 16:30 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-01-20 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] ethdev: add mbuf dynfield for incomplete IP reassembly Akhil Goyal
2022-01-20 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] security: add IPsec option for " Akhil Goyal
2022-01-30 17:59 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] ethdev: introduce IP reassembly offload Akhil Goyal
2022-01-30 17:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-01 14:11 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-02 10:57 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-02 14:05 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-01-30 17:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] ethdev: add dev op to set/get IP reassembly configuration Akhil Goyal
2022-01-30 17:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] ethdev: add mbuf dynfield for incomplete IP reassembly Akhil Goyal
2022-02-01 14:11 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-02 9:13 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-01-30 17:59 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] security: add IPsec option for " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-01 14:12 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-02 9:15 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-02 14:04 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-01 14:10 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] ethdev: introduce IP reassembly offload Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-02 9:05 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-04 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-04 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-04 22:20 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-02-07 13:53 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-07 14:36 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-04 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] ethdev: add mbuf dynfield for incomplete IP reassembly Akhil Goyal
2022-02-07 13:58 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-07 14:20 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-07 14:56 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-07 16:20 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-02-07 16:41 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-07 17:17 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-02-07 17:23 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-02-07 17:28 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-07 18:01 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-02-07 18:28 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-07 19:08 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-02-07 17:29 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-02-04 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] security: add IPsec option for " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-08 9:01 ` David Marchand
2022-02-08 9:18 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-08 9:27 ` David Marchand
2022-02-08 10:45 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-02-08 13:19 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-02-08 19:55 ` David Marchand
2022-02-08 20:01 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-02-08 20:11 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] ethdev: introduce IP reassembly offload Akhil Goyal
2022-02-08 20:11 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-08 20:11 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] ethdev: add mbuf dynfield for incomplete IP reassembly Akhil Goyal
2022-02-08 20:11 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] security: add IPsec option for " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-08 22:20 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] ethdev: introduce IP reassembly offload Akhil Goyal
2022-02-08 22:20 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-10 8:54 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-10 10:08 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-02-10 10:20 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-10 10:30 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-08 22:20 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] ethdev: add mbuf dynfield for incomplete IP reassembly Akhil Goyal
2022-02-10 8:54 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-08 22:20 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] security: add IPsec option for " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-10 8:54 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] ethdev: introduce IP reassembly offload Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CO6PR18MB4484168B2641E31F589C3238D8CA9@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
--to=gakhil@marvell.com \
--cc=adwivedi@marvell.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
--cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=matan@nvidia.com \
--cc=radu.nicolau@intel.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).