DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
To: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>,
	"radu.nicolau@intel.com" <radu.nicolau@intel.com>,
	"declan.doherty@intel.com" <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
	"hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
	"matan@nvidia.com" <matan@nvidia.com>,
	"konstantin.ananyev@intel.com" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>,
	"ferruh.yigit@intel.com" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH] RFC: ethdev: add reassembly offload
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2021 13:14:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CO6PR18MB4484168B2641E31F589C3238D8CA9@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9ceeb864-f750-8b0b-624b-5f83c79a466e@oktetlabs.ru>

> On 8/23/21 1:02 PM, Akhil Goyal wrote:
> > Reassembly is a costly operation if it is done in
> > software, however, if it is offloaded to HW, it can
> > considerably save application cycles.
> > The operation becomes even more costlier if IP fragmants
> > are encrypted.
> >
> > To resolve above two issues, a new offload
> > DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_REASSEMBLY is introduced in ethdev for
> > devices which can attempt reassembly of packets in hardware.
> > rte_eth_dev_info is added with the reassembly capabilities
> > which a device can support.
> > Now, if IP fragments are encrypted, reassembly can also be
> > attempted while doing inline IPsec processing.
> > This is controlled by a flag in rte_security_ipsec_sa_options
> > to enable reassembly of encrypted IP fragments in the inline
> > path.
> >
> > The resulting reassembled packet would be a typical
> > segmented mbuf in case of success.
> >
> > And if reassembly of fragments is failed or is incomplete (if
> > fragments do not come before the reass_timeout), the mbuf is
> > updated with an ol_flag PKT_RX_REASSEMBLY_INCOMPLETE and
> > mbuf is returned as is. Now application may decide the fate
> > of the packet to wait more for fragments to come or drop.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
> 
> Is it IPv4 only or IPv6 as well? I guess IPv4 only to start
> with. If so, I think offload name should say so. See below.
> 
We can update spec for both and update capabilities for both.
See below.

> I'd say that the feature should be added to
> doc/guides/nics/features.rst

OK will update in next version
> 
> Do we really need RX_REASSEMBLY_INCOMPLETE if we provide
> buffered packets for incomplete reassembly anyway?
> I guess it is sufficient to cover simply reassembly case
> only in HW when there is no overlapping fragments etc.
> Everything else should be handled in SW anyway as without
> the offload support at all.
> 
In that case, application would need to again parse the packet
to check whether it is a fragment or not even when the reassembly
is not required. However, we would consider your suggestion in
implementation.

> > ---
> >  lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c     |  1 +
> >  lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h     | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
> >  lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_core.h    |  3 ++-
> >  lib/security/rte_security.h | 10 ++++++++++
> >  4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> > index 9d95cd11e1..1ab3a093cf 100644
> > --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> > @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ static const struct {
> >  	RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(VLAN_FILTER),
> >  	RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(VLAN_EXTEND),
> >  	RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(JUMBO_FRAME),
> > +	RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(REASSEMBLY),
> >  	RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(SCATTER),
> >  	RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(TIMESTAMP),
> >  	RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(SECURITY),
> > diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> > index d2b27c351f..e89a4dc1eb 100644
> > --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> > +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> > @@ -1360,6 +1360,7 @@ struct rte_eth_conf {
> >  #define DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_FILTER	0x00000200
> >  #define DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_EXTEND	0x00000400
> >  #define DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_JUMBO_FRAME	0x00000800
> > +#define DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_REASSEMBLY	0x00001000
> 
> I think it should be:
> RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_REASSEMBLY
> 
> i.e. have correct prefix similar to
> RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_BUFFER_SPLIT and mention IPv4.
> 
> If we'd like to cover IPv6 as well, it could be
> RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_IP_REASSEMBLY and have IPv4/6
> support bits in the offload capabilities below.

Intention is to update spec for both.
Will update the capabilities accordingly to have both IPv4 and IPv6.

> 
> >  #define DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_SCATTER		0x00002000
> >  /**
> >   * Timestamp is set by the driver in
> RTE_MBUF_DYNFIELD_TIMESTAMP_NAME
> > @@ -1477,6 +1478,20 @@ struct rte_eth_dev_portconf {
> >   */
> >  #define RTE_ETH_DEV_SWITCH_DOMAIN_ID_INVALID
> 	(UINT16_MAX)
> >
> > +/**
> > + * Reassembly capabilities that a device can support.
> > + * The device which can support reassembly offload should set
> > + * DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_REASSEMBLY
> > + */
> > +struct rte_eth_reass_capa {
> > +	/** Maximum time in ns that a fragment can wait for further
> fragments */
> > +	uint64_t reass_timeout;
> > +	/** Maximum number of fragments that device can reassemble */
> > +	uint16_t max_frags;
> > +	/** Reserved for future capabilities */
> > +	uint16_t reserved[3];
> > +};
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * Ethernet device associated switch information
> >   */
> > @@ -1582,8 +1597,9 @@ struct rte_eth_dev_info {
> >  	 * embedded managed interconnect/switch.
> >  	 */
> >  	struct rte_eth_switch_info switch_info;
> > +	/* Reassembly capabilities of a device for reassembly offload */
> > +	struct rte_eth_reass_capa reass_capa;
> >
> > -	uint64_t reserved_64s[2]; /**< Reserved for future fields */
> >  	void *reserved_ptrs[2];   /**< Reserved for future fields */
> >  };
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_core.h b/lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_core.h
> > index bb38d7f581..cea25c87f7 100644
> > --- a/lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_core.h
> > +++ b/lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf_core.h
> > @@ -200,10 +200,11 @@ extern "C" {
> >  #define PKT_RX_OUTER_L4_CKSUM_BAD	(1ULL << 21)
> >  #define PKT_RX_OUTER_L4_CKSUM_GOOD	(1ULL << 22)
> >  #define PKT_RX_OUTER_L4_CKSUM_INVALID	((1ULL << 21) | (1ULL << 22))
> > +#define PKT_RX_REASSEMBLY_INCOMPLETE	(1ULL << 23)
> 
> In accordance with deprecation notice it should be
> RTE_MBUF_F_RX_REASSEMBLY_INCOMPLETE
> 
Ok will correct in next version.

> >
> >  /* add new RX flags here, don't forget to update PKT_FIRST_FREE */
> >
> > -#define PKT_FIRST_FREE (1ULL << 23)
> > +#define PKT_FIRST_FREE (1ULL << 24)
> >  #define PKT_LAST_FREE (1ULL << 40)
> >
> >  /* add new TX flags here, don't forget to update PKT_LAST_FREE  */
> > diff --git a/lib/security/rte_security.h b/lib/security/rte_security.h
> > index 88d31de0a6..364eeb5cd4 100644
> > --- a/lib/security/rte_security.h
> > +++ b/lib/security/rte_security.h
> > @@ -181,6 +181,16 @@ struct rte_security_ipsec_sa_options {
> >  	 * * 0: Disable per session security statistics collection for this SA.
> >  	 */
> >  	uint32_t stats : 1;
> > +
> > +	/** Enable reassembly on incoming packets.
> > +	 *
> > +	 * * 1: Enable driver to try reassembly of encrypted IP packets for
> > +	 *      this SA, if supported by the driver. This feature will work
> > +	 *      only if rx_offload DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_REASSEMBLY is set in
> > +	 *      inline ethernet device.
> 
> ethernet -> Ethernet
> 
> > +	 * * 0: Disable reassembly of packets (default).
> > +	 */
> > +	uint32_t reass_en : 1;
> >  };
> >
> >  /** IPSec security association direction */
> >


  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-29 13:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 184+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-23 10:02 [dpdk-dev] " Akhil Goyal
2021-08-23 10:18 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-08-29 13:14   ` Akhil Goyal [this message]
2021-09-21 19:59     ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Thomas Monjalon
2021-09-07  8:47 ` [dpdk-dev] " Ferruh Yigit
2021-09-08 10:29   ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Anoob Joseph
2021-09-13  6:56     ` Xu, Rosen
2021-09-13  7:22       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-09-14  5:14         ` Anoob Joseph
2021-09-08  6:34 ` [dpdk-dev] " Xu, Rosen
2021-09-08  6:36   ` Xu, Rosen
2022-01-03 15:08 ` [PATCH 0/8] ethdev: introduce IP " Akhil Goyal
2022-01-03 15:08   ` [PATCH 1/8] " Akhil Goyal
2022-01-11 16:03     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2022-01-22  7:38     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-01-30 16:53       ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-01-03 15:08   ` [PATCH 2/8] ethdev: add dev op for IP reassembly configuration Akhil Goyal
2022-01-11 16:09     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2022-01-11 18:54       ` Akhil Goyal
2022-01-12 10:22         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2022-01-12 10:32           ` Akhil Goyal
2022-01-12 10:48             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2022-01-12 11:06               ` Akhil Goyal
2022-01-13 13:31                 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-01-13 14:41                   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2022-01-03 15:08   ` [PATCH 3/8] ethdev: add mbuf dynfield for incomplete IP reassembly Akhil Goyal
2022-01-11 17:04     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2022-01-11 18:44       ` Akhil Goyal
2022-01-12 10:30         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2022-01-12 10:59           ` Akhil Goyal
2022-01-13 22:29             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2022-01-13 13:18         ` Akhil Goyal
2022-01-13 14:36           ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2022-01-13 15:04             ` Akhil Goyal
2022-01-03 15:08   ` [PATCH 4/8] security: add IPsec option for " Akhil Goyal
2022-01-03 15:08   ` [PATCH 5/8] app/test: add unit cases for inline IPsec offload Akhil Goyal
2022-01-20 16:48     ` [PATCH v2 0/4] app/test: add inline IPsec and reassembly cases Akhil Goyal
2022-01-20 16:48       ` [PATCH v2 1/4] app/test: add unit cases for inline IPsec offload Akhil Goyal
2022-01-20 16:48       ` [PATCH v2 2/4] app/test: add IP reassembly case with no frags Akhil Goyal
2022-01-20 16:48       ` [PATCH v2 3/4] app/test: add IP reassembly cases with multiple fragments Akhil Goyal
2022-01-20 16:48       ` [PATCH v2 4/4] app/test: add IP reassembly negative cases Akhil Goyal
2022-02-17 17:23       ` [PATCH v3 0/4] app/test: add inline IPsec and reassembly cases Akhil Goyal
2022-02-17 17:23         ` [PATCH v3 1/4] app/test: add unit cases for inline IPsec offload Akhil Goyal
2022-02-17 17:23         ` [PATCH v3 2/4] app/test: add IP reassembly case with no frags Akhil Goyal
2022-02-17 17:23         ` [PATCH v3 3/4] app/test: add IP reassembly cases with multiple fragments Akhil Goyal
2022-02-17 17:23         ` [PATCH v3 4/4] app/test: add IP reassembly negative cases Akhil Goyal
2022-04-16 19:25         ` [PATCH v4 00/10] app/test: add inline IPsec and reassembly cases Akhil Goyal
2022-04-16 19:25           ` [PATCH v4 01/10] app/test: add unit cases for inline IPsec offload Akhil Goyal
2022-04-16 19:25           ` [PATCH v4 02/10] test/security: add inline inbound IPsec cases Akhil Goyal
2022-04-16 19:25           ` [PATCH v4 03/10] test/security: add combined mode inline " Akhil Goyal
2022-04-16 19:25           ` [PATCH v4 04/10] test/security: add inline IPsec reassembly cases Akhil Goyal
2022-04-16 19:25           ` [PATCH v4 05/10] test/security: add more inline IPsec functional cases Akhil Goyal
2022-04-16 19:25           ` [PATCH v4 06/10] test/security: add ESN and anti-replay cases for inline Akhil Goyal
2022-04-16 19:25           ` [PATCH v4 07/10] ethdev: add IPsec SA expiry event subtypes Akhil Goyal
2022-04-19  8:58             ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-04-19 10:14               ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-04-19 10:19                 ` Anoob Joseph
2022-04-19 10:37                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-04-19 10:39                     ` Anoob Joseph
2022-04-19 10:47                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-04-19 12:27                   ` Akhil Goyal
2022-04-19 15:41                     ` Ray Kinsella
2022-04-20 13:51                       ` Akhil Goyal
2022-09-24 13:57             ` [PATCH v5 0/3] Add and test IPsec SA expiry events Akhil Goyal
2022-09-24 13:57               ` [PATCH v5 1/3] ethdev: add IPsec SA expiry event subtypes Akhil Goyal
2022-09-24 14:02                 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-09-26 14:02                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-09-27 18:44                   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-09-24 13:57               ` [PATCH v5 2/3] test/security: add inline IPsec SA soft expiry cases Akhil Goyal
2022-09-24 13:57               ` [PATCH v5 3/3] test/security: add inline IPsec SA hard " Akhil Goyal
2022-09-26 17:07               ` [PATCH v6 0/3] Add and test IPsec SA expiry events Akhil Goyal
2022-09-26 17:07                 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] ethdev: add IPsec SA expiry event subtypes Akhil Goyal
2022-09-26 17:07                 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] test/security: add inline IPsec SA soft expiry cases Akhil Goyal
2022-09-26 17:07                 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] test/security: add inline IPsec SA hard " Akhil Goyal
2022-04-16 19:25           ` [PATCH v4 08/10] test/security: add inline IPsec SA soft " Akhil Goyal
2022-04-16 19:25           ` [PATCH v4 09/10] test/security: add inline IPsec SA hard " Akhil Goyal
2022-04-16 19:25           ` [PATCH v4 10/10] test/security: add inline IPsec IPv6 flow label cases Akhil Goyal
2022-04-18  3:44             ` Anoob Joseph
2022-04-18  3:55               ` Akhil Goyal
2022-04-25 12:38           ` [PATCH v4 00/10] app/test: add inline IPsec and reassembly cases Poczatek, Jakub
2022-04-27 15:10           ` [PATCH v5 0/7] " Akhil Goyal
2022-04-27 15:10             ` [PATCH v5 1/7] app/test: add unit cases for inline IPsec offload Akhil Goyal
2022-04-27 15:44               ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-04-27 15:10             ` [PATCH v5 2/7] test/security: add inline inbound IPsec cases Akhil Goyal
2022-04-27 15:44               ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-04-27 15:10             ` [PATCH v5 3/7] test/security: add combined mode inline " Akhil Goyal
2022-04-27 15:45               ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-04-27 15:10             ` [PATCH v5 4/7] test/security: add inline IPsec reassembly cases Akhil Goyal
2022-04-27 15:45               ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-04-27 15:10             ` [PATCH v5 5/7] test/security: add more inline IPsec functional cases Akhil Goyal
2022-04-27 15:46               ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-04-27 15:10             ` [PATCH v5 6/7] test/security: add ESN and anti-replay cases for inline Akhil Goyal
2022-04-27 15:46               ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-04-28  5:25               ` Anoob Joseph
2022-04-27 15:10             ` [PATCH v5 7/7] test/security: add inline IPsec IPv6 flow label cases Akhil Goyal
2022-04-27 15:46               ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-04-27 15:42             ` [PATCH v5 0/7] app/test: add inline IPsec and reassembly cases Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-05-13  7:31             ` [PATCH v6 " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-13  7:31               ` [PATCH v6 1/7] app/test: add unit cases for inline IPsec offload Akhil Goyal
2022-05-13  7:31               ` [PATCH v6 2/7] test/security: add inline inbound IPsec cases Akhil Goyal
2022-05-13  7:31               ` [PATCH v6 3/7] test/security: add combined mode inline " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-13  7:31               ` [PATCH v6 4/7] test/security: add inline IPsec reassembly cases Akhil Goyal
2022-05-13  7:31               ` [PATCH v6 5/7] test/security: add more inline IPsec functional cases Akhil Goyal
2022-05-13  7:32               ` [PATCH v6 6/7] test/security: add ESN and anti-replay cases for inline Akhil Goyal
2022-05-13  7:32               ` [PATCH v6 7/7] test/security: add inline IPsec IPv6 flow label cases Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24  7:22               ` [PATCH v7 0/7] app/test: add inline IPsec and reassembly cases Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24  7:22                 ` [PATCH v7 1/7] app/test: add unit cases for inline IPsec offload Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24  7:22                 ` [PATCH v7 2/7] test/security: add inline inbound IPsec cases Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24  7:22                 ` [PATCH v7 3/7] test/security: add combined mode inline " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24  7:22                 ` [PATCH v7 4/7] test/security: add inline IPsec reassembly cases Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24  7:22                 ` [PATCH v7 5/7] test/security: add more inline IPsec functional cases Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24  7:22                 ` [PATCH v7 6/7] test/security: add ESN and anti-replay cases for inline Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24  7:22                 ` [PATCH v7 7/7] test/security: add inline IPsec IPv6 flow label cases Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24  8:05                 ` [PATCH v7 0/7] app/test: add inline IPsec and reassembly cases Anoob Joseph
2022-05-24  9:38                   ` Akhil Goyal
2022-01-03 15:08   ` [PATCH 6/8] app/test: add IP reassembly case with no frags Akhil Goyal
2022-01-03 15:08   ` [PATCH 7/8] app/test: add IP reassembly cases with multiple fragments Akhil Goyal
2022-01-03 15:08   ` [PATCH 8/8] app/test: add IP reassembly negative cases Akhil Goyal
2022-01-06  9:51   ` [PATCH 0/8] ethdev: introduce IP reassembly offload David Marchand
2022-01-06  9:54     ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-01-20 16:26   ` [PATCH v2 0/4] " Akhil Goyal
2022-01-20 16:26     ` [PATCH v2 1/4] " Akhil Goyal
2022-01-20 16:45       ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-01-20 17:11         ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-01-20 16:26     ` [PATCH v2 2/4] ethdev: add dev op to set/get IP reassembly configuration Akhil Goyal
2022-01-22  8:17       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-01-30 16:30         ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-01-20 16:26     ` [PATCH v2 3/4] ethdev: add mbuf dynfield for incomplete IP reassembly Akhil Goyal
2022-01-20 16:26     ` [PATCH v2 4/4] security: add IPsec option for " Akhil Goyal
2022-01-30 17:59     ` [PATCH v3 0/4] ethdev: introduce IP reassembly offload Akhil Goyal
2022-01-30 17:59       ` [PATCH v3 1/4] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-01 14:11         ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-02 10:57           ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-02 14:05             ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-01-30 17:59       ` [PATCH v3 2/4] ethdev: add dev op to set/get IP reassembly configuration Akhil Goyal
2022-01-30 17:59       ` [PATCH v3 3/4] ethdev: add mbuf dynfield for incomplete IP reassembly Akhil Goyal
2022-02-01 14:11         ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-02  9:13           ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-01-30 17:59       ` [PATCH v3 4/4] security: add IPsec option for " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-01 14:12         ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-02  9:15           ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-02 14:04             ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-01 14:10       ` [PATCH v3 0/4] ethdev: introduce IP reassembly offload Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-02  9:05         ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-04 22:13       ` [PATCH v4 0/3] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-04 22:13         ` [PATCH v4 1/3] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-04 22:20           ` Akhil Goyal
2022-02-07 13:53           ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-07 14:36             ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-04 22:13         ` [PATCH v4 2/3] ethdev: add mbuf dynfield for incomplete IP reassembly Akhil Goyal
2022-02-07 13:58           ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-07 14:20             ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-07 14:56               ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-07 16:20                 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-02-07 16:41                   ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-07 17:17                     ` Akhil Goyal
2022-02-07 17:23           ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-02-07 17:28             ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-07 18:01               ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-02-07 18:28                 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-07 19:08                   ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-02-07 17:29             ` Akhil Goyal
2022-02-04 22:13         ` [PATCH v4 3/3] security: add IPsec option for " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-08  9:01           ` David Marchand
2022-02-08  9:18             ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-08  9:27               ` David Marchand
2022-02-08 10:45                 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-02-08 13:19                   ` Akhil Goyal
2022-02-08 19:55                     ` David Marchand
2022-02-08 20:01                       ` Akhil Goyal
2022-02-08 20:11         ` [PATCH v5 0/3] ethdev: introduce IP reassembly offload Akhil Goyal
2022-02-08 20:11           ` [PATCH v5 1/3] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-08 20:11           ` [PATCH v5 2/3] ethdev: add mbuf dynfield for incomplete IP reassembly Akhil Goyal
2022-02-08 20:11           ` [PATCH v5 3/3] security: add IPsec option for " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-08 22:20           ` [PATCH v6 0/3] ethdev: introduce IP reassembly offload Akhil Goyal
2022-02-08 22:20             ` [PATCH v6 1/3] " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-10  8:54               ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-10 10:08               ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-02-10 10:20                 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-10 10:30                   ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-08 22:20             ` [PATCH v6 2/3] ethdev: add mbuf dynfield for incomplete IP reassembly Akhil Goyal
2022-02-10  8:54               ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-08 22:20             ` [PATCH v6 3/3] security: add IPsec option for " Akhil Goyal
2022-02-10  8:54             ` [PATCH v6 0/3] ethdev: introduce IP reassembly offload Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CO6PR18MB4484168B2641E31F589C3238D8CA9@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=gakhil@marvell.com \
    --cc=adwivedi@marvell.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
    --cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=matan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=radu.nicolau@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).