DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
To: Nithin Kumar Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>,
	"hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
	Fan Zhang <fanzhang.oss@gmail.com>, Kai Ji <kai.ji@intel.com>,
	"ciara.power@intel.com" <ciara.power@intel.com>,
	"matan@nvidia.com" <matan@nvidia.com>,
	Gagandeep Singh <g.singh@nxp.com>,
	"konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru" <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>,
	"stephen@networkplumber.org" <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	Nithin Kumar Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>,
	"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] doc: announce addition of new security IPsec SA option
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 14:35:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CO6PR18MB44846642191D549A1390A126D829A@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230701071551.2027089-1-ndabilpuram@marvell.com>

> Subject: [PATCH] doc: announce addition of new security IPsec SA option
> 
> Announce addition of new security IPsec SA option to enable
> out of place processing in Ingress Inline inbound SA's.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nithin Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>
> ---
>  doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> index 8e1cdd677a..20ce0a51af 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> @@ -156,3 +156,8 @@ Deprecation Notices
>    The new port library API (functions rte_swx_port_*)
>    will gradually transition from experimental to stable status
>    starting with DPDK 23.07 release.
> +
> +* security: New sa option ``ingress_oop`` would be added in structure
> +  ``rte_security_ipsec_sa_options`` to support out of place processing
> +  for inline inbound SA's. ``reserved_opts`` size would be reduced by
> +  1 bit from DPDK 23.11.

As discussed in techboard meetings, reserved fields should not be added.
Hence we can update the above note to remove reserved_opts as well.

With that fixed.
Acked-by: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>

++ more people for acks.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-03 14:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-09  8:56 [RFC 1/2] security: introduce out of place support for inline ingress Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-03-09  8:56 ` [RFC 2/2] test/security: add unittest for inline ingress oop Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-04-11 10:04 ` [PATCH 1/3] security: introduce out of place support for inline ingress Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-04-11 10:04   ` [PATCH 2/3] net/cnxk: support inline ingress out of place session Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-04-11 10:04   ` [PATCH 3/3] test/security: add unittest for inline ingress oop Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-04-11 18:05   ` [PATCH 1/3] security: introduce out of place support for inline ingress Stephen Hemminger
2023-04-18  8:33     ` Jerin Jacob
2023-04-24 22:41       ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-05-19  8:07         ` Jerin Jacob
2023-05-30  9:23           ` Jerin Jacob
2023-05-30 13:51             ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-05-31  9:26               ` Morten Brørup
2023-07-01  7:15   ` [PATCH] doc: announce addition of new security IPsec SA option Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-07-03 14:35     ` Akhil Goyal [this message]
2023-07-04  5:15     ` [PATCH v2] " Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-07-05 14:07       ` Jerin Jacob
2023-07-11  8:55         ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2023-07-06 23:05     ` [PATCH] " Ji, Kai
2023-08-11  8:54 ` [PATCH 1/3] security: introduce out of place support for inline ingress Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-08-11  8:54   ` [PATCH 2/3] net/cnxk: support inline ingress out of place session Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-08-11  8:54   ` [PATCH 3/3] test/security: add unittest for inline ingress oop Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-09-19 19:55   ` [PATCH 1/3] security: introduce out of place support for inline ingress Akhil Goyal
2023-09-21  2:15 ` [PATCH v2 " Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-09-21  2:15   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] net/cnxk: support inline ingress out of place session Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-09-21  2:15   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] test/security: add unittest for inline ingress oop Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-09-21 10:44   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] security: introduce out of place support for inline ingress Akhil Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CO6PR18MB44846642191D549A1390A126D829A@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=gakhil@marvell.com \
    --cc=ciara.power@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=fanzhang.oss@gmail.com \
    --cc=g.singh@nxp.com \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=kai.ji@intel.com \
    --cc=konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru \
    --cc=matan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ndabilpuram@marvell.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).