DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
To: Ganapati Kundapura <ganapati.kundapura@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com" <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>,
	"ferruh.yigit@amd.com" <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>,
	"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"bruce.richardson@intel.com" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	"fanzhang.oss@gmail.com" <fanzhang.oss@gmail.com>,
	"ciara.power@intel.com" <ciara.power@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH v2 1/2] crypto: fix build issues on unsetting crypto callbacks macro
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 08:12:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CO6PR18MB4484976E45F0DB5156314A61D8F32@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240529144025.4089318-1-ganapati.kundapura@intel.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ganapati Kundapura <ganapati.kundapura@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2024 8:10 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org; Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>;
> abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com; ferruh.yigit@amd.com; thomas@monjalon.net;
> bruce.richardson@intel.com; fanzhang.oss@gmail.com; ciara.power@intel.com
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH v2 1/2] crypto: fix build issues on unsetting crypto
> callbacks macro
> 
> Prioritize security for external emails: Confirm sender and content safety before
> clicking links or opening attachments
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Crypto callbacks macro is defined with value 1 and being used with ifdef,
> on config value is changed to 0 to disable, crypto callback changes
> still being compiled.
> 
> Used #if instead of #ifdef and also wrapped crypto callback changes
> under RTE_CRYPTO_CALLBACKS macro to fix build issues when macro is
> unset.
> 
> Fixes: 1c3ffb95595e ("cryptodev: add enqueue and dequeue callbacks")
> Fixes: 5523a75af539 ("test/crypto: add case for enqueue/dequeue callbacks")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ganapati Kundapura <ganapati.kundapura@intel.com>
> ---
> v2:
> * Used #if instead of #ifdef and restored macro definition in config
> * Split callback registration check in a seperate patch
> 
> diff --git a/app/test/test_cryptodev.c b/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
> index 1703ebc..72cf77f 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
> @@ -14547,6 +14547,7 @@ test_null_burst_operation(void)
>  	return TEST_SUCCESS;
>  }
> 
> +#if RTE_CRYPTO_CALLBACKS
>  static uint16_t
>  test_enq_callback(uint16_t dev_id, uint16_t qp_id, struct rte_crypto_op **ops,
>  		  uint16_t nb_ops, void *user_param)
> @@ -14784,6 +14785,7 @@ test_deq_callback_setup(void)
> 
>  	return TEST_SUCCESS;
>  }
> +#endif /* RTE_CRYPTO_CALLBACKS */
> 
>  static void
>  generate_gmac_large_plaintext(uint8_t *data)
> @@ -18069,8 +18071,10 @@ static struct unit_test_suite
> cryptodev_gen_testsuite  = {
>  		TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup, ut_teardown,
>  				test_device_configure_invalid_queue_pair_ids),
>  		TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup, ut_teardown, test_stats),
> +#if RTE_CRYPTO_CALLBACKS
>  		TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup, ut_teardown,
> test_enq_callback_setup),
>  		TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup, ut_teardown,
> test_deq_callback_setup),
> +#endif
>  		TEST_CASES_END() /**< NULL terminate unit test array */
>  	}
>  };

#if may not be needed in application.
Test should be skipped if API is not available/supported.

> diff --git a/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c b/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
> index 886eb7a..2e0890f 100644
> --- a/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
> +++ b/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
> @@ -628,6 +628,7 @@ rte_cryptodev_asym_xform_capability_check_hash(
>  	return ret;
>  }
> 
> +#if RTE_CRYPTO_CALLBACKS
>  /* spinlock for crypto device enq callbacks */
>  static rte_spinlock_t rte_cryptodev_callback_lock = RTE_SPINLOCK_INITIALIZER;
> 
> @@ -744,6 +745,7 @@ cryptodev_cb_init(struct rte_cryptodev *dev)
>  	cryptodev_cb_cleanup(dev);
>  	return -ENOMEM;
>  }
> +#endif /* RTE_CRYPTO_CALLBACKS */


> @@ -1485,6 +1491,7 @@ rte_cryptodev_queue_pair_setup(uint8_t dev_id,
> uint16_t queue_pair_id,
>  			socket_id);
>  }
> 
> +#if RTE_CRYPTO_CALLBACKS
>  struct rte_cryptodev_cb *
>  rte_cryptodev_add_enq_callback(uint8_t dev_id,
>  			       uint16_t qp_id,
> @@ -1763,6 +1770,7 @@ rte_cryptodev_remove_deq_callback(uint8_t dev_id,
>  	rte_spinlock_unlock(&rte_cryptodev_callback_lock);
>  	return ret;
>  }
> +#endif /* RTE_CRYPTO_CALLBACKS */

There is an issue here.
The APIs are visible in .h file and are available for application to use.
But the API implementation is compiled out.
Rather, you should add a return ENOTSUP from the beginning of the APIs
if RTE_CRYPTO_CALLBACKS  is enabled.
With this approach application will not need to put #if in its code.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-30  8:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-16  8:12 [PATCH v1] crypto: fix build issues on crypto callbacks macro undefined Ganapati Kundapura
2024-04-16  9:16 ` Gujjar, Abhinandan S
2024-04-17 11:40 ` Power, Ciara
2024-05-22  8:51   ` Kundapura, Ganapati
2024-05-22  8:55     ` Akhil Goyal
2024-05-22 13:51       ` Akhil Goyal
2024-05-22 14:45         ` Kundapura, Ganapati
2024-05-22 18:36           ` Akhil Goyal
2024-05-23  8:54             ` Kundapura, Ganapati
2024-05-29  8:35 ` [EXTERNAL] " Akhil Goyal
2024-05-29  9:57   ` Kundapura, Ganapati
2024-05-29 11:40     ` Akhil Goyal
2024-05-29 14:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] crypto: fix build issues on unsetting crypto callbacks macro Ganapati Kundapura
2024-05-29 14:40   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] crypto: validate crypto callbacks from next node Ganapati Kundapura
2024-05-30  8:13     ` [EXTERNAL] " Akhil Goyal
2024-05-30  8:12   ` Akhil Goyal [this message]
2024-05-30 11:01     ` [EXTERNAL] [PATCH v2 1/2] crypto: fix build issues on unsetting crypto callbacks macro Akhil Goyal
2024-05-30 11:13       ` Morten Brørup
2024-05-30 11:41         ` Kundapura, Ganapati
2024-05-30 11:45           ` Morten Brørup
2024-05-30 11:40       ` Kundapura, Ganapati
2024-05-30 11:46         ` Akhil Goyal
2024-05-30 11:52           ` Morten Brørup
2024-05-30 14:22           ` Kundapura, Ganapati
2024-05-30 14:49             ` Morten Brørup
2024-06-06  9:44               ` Akhil Goyal
2024-06-13 18:03                 ` Akhil Goyal
2024-06-20 14:34                   ` Kundapura, Ganapati

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CO6PR18MB4484976E45F0DB5156314A61D8F32@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=gakhil@marvell.com \
    --cc=abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=ciara.power@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=fanzhang.oss@gmail.com \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
    --cc=ganapati.kundapura@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).