DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
To: Arek Kusztal <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "roy.fan.zhang@intel.com" <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [EXT] [PATCH v2 02/14] cryptodev: reduce number of comments in asym xform
Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 09:52:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CO6PR18MB4484EDEFBEEFA88D3181F40BD8D99@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220525155324.9288-3-arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>

> - Reduced number of comments in asymmetric xform.
> Information describing basic functionality of well known
> algorithms are unnecessary.
> - Removed NONE asymetric xform.

I commented on v1 not to remove this and I do not see comment from your side
for removing it.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Arek Kusztal <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>
> ---
>  app/test/test_cryptodev_asym.c  |   2 -
>  lib/cryptodev/rte_crypto_asym.h | 114 ++++++++++++++++------------------------
>  lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c   |   1 -
>  3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test/test_cryptodev_asym.c b/app/test/test_cryptodev_asym.c
> index 573af2a537..5aa9d65395 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_cryptodev_asym.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_cryptodev_asym.c
> @@ -288,7 +288,6 @@ test_cryptodev_asym_ver(struct rte_crypto_op *op,
>  		break;
>  	case RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_DH:
>  	case RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_DSA:
> -	case RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_NONE:
>  	case RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_UNSPECIFIED:
>  	default:
>  		break;
> @@ -440,7 +439,6 @@ test_cryptodev_asym_op(struct
> crypto_testsuite_params_asym *ts_params,
>  		break;
>  	case RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_DH:
>  	case RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_DSA:
> -	case RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_NONE:
>  	case RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_UNSPECIFIED:
>  	default:
>  		snprintf(test_msg, ASYM_TEST_MSG_LEN,
> diff --git a/lib/cryptodev/rte_crypto_asym.h b/lib/cryptodev/rte_crypto_asym.h
> index 7206652458..66ffb29743 100644
> --- a/lib/cryptodev/rte_crypto_asym.h
> +++ b/lib/cryptodev/rte_crypto_asym.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,40 @@ extern const char *
>  rte_crypto_asym_op_strings[];
> 
>  /**
> + * Buffer to hold crypto params required for asym operations.
> + *
> + * These buffers can be used for both input to PMD and output from PMD.
> When
> + * used for output from PMD, application has to ensure the buffer is large
> + * enough to hold the target data.
> + *
> + * If an operation requires the PMD to generate a random number,
> + * and the device supports CSRNG, 'data' should be set to NULL.
> + * The crypto parameter in question will not be used by the PMD,
> + * as it is internally generated.
> + */
> +typedef struct rte_crypto_param_t {
> +	uint8_t *data;
> +	/**< pointer to buffer holding data */
> +	rte_iova_t iova;
> +	/**< IO address of data buffer */
> +	size_t length;
> +	/**< length of data in bytes */
> +} rte_crypto_param;
> +
> +/** Unsigned big-integer in big-endian format */
> +typedef rte_crypto_param rte_crypto_uint;
> +
> +/**
> + * Structure for elliptic curve point
> + */
> +struct rte_crypto_ec_point {
> +	rte_crypto_param x;
> +	/**< X coordinate */
> +	rte_crypto_param y;
> +	/**< Y coordinate */
> +};

Why is this movement of code done?

> +
> +/**
>   * List of elliptic curves. This enum aligns with
>   * TLS "Supported Groups" registry (previously known  as
>   * NamedCurve registry). FFDH groups are not, and will not
> @@ -55,46 +89,23 @@ enum rte_crypto_curve_id {
>  };
> 
>  /**
> - * Asymmetric crypto transformation types.
> - * Each xform type maps to one asymmetric algorithm
> - * performing specific operation
> - *
> + * Asymmetric crypto algorithms

Since you are deferring the change for xform, it is better to keep the
Above description as well. So no need for this above change.

>   */
>  enum rte_crypto_asym_xform_type {
> -	RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_UNSPECIFIED = 0,
> +	RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_UNSPECIFIED,
>  	/**< Invalid xform. */
> -	RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_NONE,
> -	/**< Xform type None.
> -	 * May be supported by PMD to support
> -	 * passthrough op for debugging purpose.
> -	 * if xform_type none , op_type is disregarded.
> -	 */
>  	RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_RSA,
> -	/**< RSA. Performs Encrypt, Decrypt, Sign and Verify.
> -	 * Refer to rte_crypto_asym_op_type
> -	 */
> +	/**< RSA */

I believe it is better to have a short one line description is good to have
For someone who is new to asymmetric cryptography.

You can remove "* Refer to rte_crypto_asym_op_type "

>  	RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_DH,
> -	/**< Diffie-Hellman.
> -	 * Performs Key Generate and Shared Secret Compute.
> -	 * Refer to rte_crypto_asym_op_type
> -	 */
> +	/**< Diffie-Hellman */
>  	RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_DSA,
> -	/**< Digital Signature Algorithm
> -	 * Performs Signature Generation and Verification.
> -	 * Refer to rte_crypto_asym_op_type
> -	 */
> +	/**< Digital Signature Algorithm */
>  	RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_MODINV,
> -	/**< Modular Multiplicative Inverse
> -	 * Perform Modular Multiplicative Inverse b^(-1) mod n
> -	 */
> +	/**< Modular Multiplicative Inverse */
>  	RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_MODEX,
> -	/**< Modular Exponentiation
> -	 * Perform Modular Exponentiation b^e mod n
> -	 */
> +	/**< Modular Exponentiation */
>  	RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_ECDSA,
> -	/**< Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm
> -	 * Perform Signature Generation and Verification.
> -	 */
> +	/**< Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm */
>  	RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_ECPM,
>  	/**< Elliptic Curve Point Multiplication */
>  	RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_TYPE_LIST_END
> @@ -126,11 +137,12 @@ enum rte_crypto_asym_op_type {
>   * Padding types for RSA signature.
>   */
>  enum rte_crypto_rsa_padding_type {
> -	RTE_CRYPTO_RSA_PADDING_NONE = 0,
> +	RTE_CRYPTO_RSA_PADDING_NONE,
>  	/**< RSA no padding scheme */
>  	RTE_CRYPTO_RSA_PADDING_PKCS1_5,
> -	/**< RSA PKCS#1 PKCS1-v1_5 padding scheme. For signatures block type
> 01,
> -	 * for encryption block type 02 are used.
> +	/**< RSA PKCS#1 PKCS1-v1_5 padding scheme.
> +	 * For signatures block type 01, for encryption
> +	 * block type 02 are used.
>  	 */
>  	RTE_CRYPTO_RSA_PADDING_OAEP,
>  	/**< RSA PKCS#1 OAEP padding scheme */
> @@ -156,40 +168,6 @@ enum rte_crypto_rsa_priv_key_type {
>  };
> 
>  /**
> - * Buffer to hold crypto params required for asym operations.
> - *
> - * These buffers can be used for both input to PMD and output from PMD.
> When
> - * used for output from PMD, application has to ensure the buffer is large
> - * enough to hold the target data.
> - *
> - * If an operation requires the PMD to generate a random number,
> - * and the device supports CSRNG, 'data' should be set to NULL.
> - * The crypto parameter in question will not be used by the PMD,
> - * as it is internally generated.
> - */
> -typedef struct rte_crypto_param_t {
> -	uint8_t *data;
> -	/**< pointer to buffer holding data */
> -	rte_iova_t iova;
> -	/**< IO address of data buffer */
> -	size_t length;
> -	/**< length of data in bytes */
> -} rte_crypto_param;
> -
> -/** Unsigned big-integer in big-endian format */
> -typedef rte_crypto_param rte_crypto_uint;
> -
> -/**
> - * Structure for elliptic curve point
> - */
> -struct rte_crypto_ec_point {
> -	rte_crypto_param x;
> -	/**< X coordinate */
> -	rte_crypto_param y;
> -	/**< Y coordinate */
> -};
> -
> -/**
>   * Structure describing RSA private key in quintuple format.
>   * See PKCS V1.5 RSA Cryptography Standard.
>   */
> diff --git a/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c b/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
> index e16e6802aa..691625bd04 100644
> --- a/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
> +++ b/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
> @@ -160,7 +160,6 @@ rte_crypto_aead_operation_strings[] = {
>   * Asymmetric crypto transform operation strings identifiers.
>   */
>  const char *rte_crypto_asym_xform_strings[] = {
> -	[RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_NONE]	= "none",
>  	[RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_RSA]	= "rsa",
>  	[RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_MODEX]	= "modexp",
>  	[RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_MODINV]	= "modinv",
> --
> 2.13.6


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-26  9:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-25 15:53 [PATCH v2 00/14] cryptodev: rsa, dh, ecdh changes Arek Kusztal
2022-05-25 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] cryptodev: redefine ec group enum Arek Kusztal
2022-05-26  9:40   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-25 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] cryptodev: reduce number of comments in asym xform Arek Kusztal
2022-05-26  9:52   ` Akhil Goyal [this message]
2022-05-26 10:03     ` [EXT] " Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-25 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] cryptodev: separate key exchange operation enum Arek Kusztal
2022-05-26 10:57   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-26 11:06     ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-26 11:09       ` Akhil Goyal
2022-05-25 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] cryptodev: remove comment about using ephemeral key in dsa Arek Kusztal
2022-05-26 11:02   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-25 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] cryptodev: clarify usage of private key in dh Arek Kusztal
2022-05-26 11:04   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-25 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] cryptodev: move dh type from xform to dh op Arek Kusztal
2022-05-26 11:23   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-25 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] cryptodev: add elliptic curve diffie hellman Arek Kusztal
2022-05-26 11:29   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-26 11:44     ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-25 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] cryptodev: add public key verify option Arek Kusztal
2022-05-26 11:34   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-26 11:46     ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-25 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] cryptodev: add asym op flags Arek Kusztal
2022-05-26 11:46   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-25 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] cryptodev: clarify usage of rsa padding hash Arek Kusztal
2022-05-26 11:56   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-25 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] cryptodev: move RSA padding into separate struct Arek Kusztal
2022-05-26 12:04   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-26 12:14     ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-26 12:19       ` Akhil Goyal
2022-05-26 12:35         ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-26 12:41           ` Akhil Goyal
2022-05-25 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] cryptodev: clarify rsa verify with none padding Arek Kusztal
2022-05-26 12:06   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-26 12:15     ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-25 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] cryptodev: add salt length and optional label Arek Kusztal
2022-05-26 12:08   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-25 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] cryptodev: add asym algorithms capabilities Arek Kusztal
2022-05-26 12:54   ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-26 14:19     ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-26 15:00       ` Akhil Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CO6PR18MB4484EDEFBEEFA88D3181F40BD8D99@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=gakhil@marvell.com \
    --cc=arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).