From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from COL004-OMC4S10.hotmail.com (col004-omc4s10.hotmail.com [65.55.34.212]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A95CE7F94 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 09:13:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from COL402-EAS307 ([65.55.34.199]) by COL004-OMC4S10.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22751); Wed, 29 Oct 2014 01:21:53 -0700 X-TMN: [bvE5iX/IUTIzswj8IhdDfBf0CekTQeNt] X-Originating-Email: [jinronggong@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: GongJinrong To: Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 16:21:50 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: Ac/zUKmGRwFsxHpCT/6D9Y/O9Fw+Pg== Content-Language: zh-cn X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Oct 2014 08:21:53.0619 (UTC) FILETIME=[65671A30:01CFF351] Subject: [dpdk-dev] How to improve the TX performance? X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:13:04 -0000 Hi, Guys I am using DPDK for the packet transmission, but rte_eth_tx_burst() seems drops too many packets, the NIC is 82574, anyone to help, thanks a lot. also, does DPDK has a reliable TX API for no packet drop? Best Regard John Gong