From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD37B41EBC; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 12:09:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DBDF42F98; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 12:09:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC5C240395 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 12:09:07 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1679051347; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=BqPGtAhT+nBRFfeKenXGgcs/j7ypb5u2WBAVQMP3Kmw=; b=Sf11LvCfCXNWo9un44gRN8FksAwAQhZseB07D1kEl+atGkx+TzhvE5kGRfXn1N7kSQPNS+ wvqng+euj2DKfzs1hDjvIib7i6Nc0BEL0+S9KdvWkgIOfAOZl91QeZNUlo8YS64NDhBGYL VAdZctlmqInSQ6INNtob9diqfc762Zo= Received: from mail-wm1-f72.google.com (mail-wm1-f72.google.com [209.85.128.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-517-SEEItqqBMZu3AFZstQ7KtA-1; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 07:09:06 -0400 X-MC-Unique: SEEItqqBMZu3AFZstQ7KtA-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f72.google.com with SMTP id p22-20020a7bcc96000000b003e2036a1516so4111983wma.7 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 04:09:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1679051345; h=in-reply-to:references:from:subject:cc:to:message-id:date :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=BqPGtAhT+nBRFfeKenXGgcs/j7ypb5u2WBAVQMP3Kmw=; b=5ssC6OtzlrTdUKMwnyYHswqsJNzI/7eXpHjKfhXumo4UdZ+iLMlVa9AllyBSKWz7lm tF71VTgdmq5Gj35AG4taPU6TYyqHdhWLcv3N/U+Mfmz+sxywyS51yyebpYQk3F+rIrrv 1SgR/PwBhYecWqtixaUel7ciYfggFIrCJaljSTy173Te6zThKRkiY+uH0g8O1imcZLHO dx0Ip2oV0Eta0yKYmySvARNzW8sKyt25xmJ8GnEAFgRCmICvqAXu46iIgqCKmGHAUhcc 4IzjAi0OG8bQsNrT2zGGVh9c5X5QJdSOk2jhOyGj871HzISy4Y6944UGURzqVnkyugJ8 Z9Pw== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKUy1RxUZ8cl7GyNo0hndm92lST9KacoZ6CqVxeUnkop/QeQhR+q gR3n64jm/ZsXKPv/+uTOLLsyoYXlhcKYg2jxNTZjBpraFSEjO/NVCNpbhJ5v/MGJL7gaJq8sa9Q 1CV0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:474d:b0:3eb:39e2:915b with SMTP id w13-20020a05600c474d00b003eb39e2915bmr23621579wmo.31.1679051345127; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 04:09:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set924ovPUwb6QfSC+5pgpI4eijRMEUqnvSA8a4qjABfEsJ/avth+7QQhH8iGtTCGLhsqrdK56g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:474d:b0:3eb:39e2:915b with SMTP id w13-20020a05600c474d00b003eb39e2915bmr23621568wmo.31.1679051344901; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 04:09:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a01:e0a:a9a:c460:ada2:6df5:d1b0:21e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i26-20020a1c541a000000b003ed246f76a2sm7883432wmb.1.2023.03.17.04.09.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 17 Mar 2023 04:09:04 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 12:09:04 +0100 Message-Id: To: "Ferruh Yigit" , "Aman Singh" , "Yuying Zhang" Cc: , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] app/testpmd: add testpmd based sleeping From: "Anthony Harivel" X-Mailer: aerc/0.13.0-123-g2937830491b5 References: <20230316151438.186241-1-aharivel@redhat.com> <20230316151438.186241-2-aharivel@redhat.com> <98399365-a3ab-9ade-4102-22e3582e2358@amd.com> In-Reply-To: <98399365-a3ab-9ade-4102-22e3582e2358@amd.com> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 1 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Ferruh Yigit, Mar 16, 2023 at 18:05: > Hi Anthony, > > What is the motivation here? Hi Ferruh, AFAIK testpmd is the reference tool used for CI and tests whether it is for functional or performance tests and I think it would be in everyone's interest to consume less CPU during them. Moreover, all patches coming to the ML are going through validation tests and this could reduce the maintenance cost of the project.