DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aidan Goddard <aidan.goddard@accelercomm.com>
To: Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"akhil.goyal@nxp.com" <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
Cc: "bruce.richardson@intel.com" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	Dave Burley <dave.burley@accelercomm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/7] app/bbdev: add explicit ut for latency vs	validation
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 09:49:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CWXP265MB08248C55C608A9208AFFD037F4200@CWXP265MB0824.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1597795557-39612-2-git-send-email-nicolas.chautru@intel.com>

Acked-by: Aidan Goddard <aidan.goddard@accelercomm.com>


From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> on behalf of Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
Sent: 19 August 2020 01:05
To: dev@dpdk.org <dev@dpdk.org>; akhil.goyal@nxp.com <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
Cc: bruce.richardson@intel.com <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/7] app/bbdev: add explicit ut for latency vs validation 
 
Adding explicit different ut when testing for validation
or latency (early termination enabled or not).

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
---
 app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 88 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
index 45c0d62..1319afd 100644
--- a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
+++ b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
@@ -3928,12 +3928,14 @@ typedef int (test_case_function)(struct active_device *ad,
         return i;
 }
 
+/* Test case for latency/validation for LDPC Decoder */
 static int
 latency_test_ldpc_dec(struct rte_mempool *mempool,
                 struct test_buffers *bufs, struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *ref_op,
                 int vector_mask, uint16_t dev_id, uint16_t queue_id,
                 const uint16_t num_to_process, uint16_t burst_sz,
-               uint64_t *total_time, uint64_t *min_time, uint64_t *max_time)
+               uint64_t *total_time, uint64_t *min_time, uint64_t *max_time,
+               bool disable_et)
 {
         int ret = TEST_SUCCESS;
         uint16_t i, j, dequeued;
@@ -3955,7 +3957,7 @@ typedef int (test_case_function)(struct active_device *ad,
                                 "rte_bbdev_dec_op_alloc_bulk() failed");
 
                 /* For latency tests we need to disable early termination */
-               if (check_bit(ref_op->ldpc_dec.op_flags,
+               if (disable_et && check_bit(ref_op->ldpc_dec.op_flags,
                                 RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_ITERATION_STOP_ENABLE))
                         ref_op->ldpc_dec.op_flags -=
                                         RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_ITERATION_STOP_ENABLE;
@@ -4177,7 +4179,7 @@ typedef int (test_case_function)(struct active_device *ad,
         TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(op_type_str, "Invalid op type: %u", op_type);
 
         printf("+ ------------------------------------------------------- +\n");
-       printf("== test: validation/latency\ndev: %s, burst size: %u, num ops: %u, op type: %s\n",
+       printf("== test: latency\ndev: %s, burst size: %u, num ops: %u, op type: %s\n",
                         info.dev_name, burst_sz, num_to_process, op_type_str);
 
         if (op_type == RTE_BBDEV_OP_TURBO_DEC)
@@ -4199,7 +4201,83 @@ typedef int (test_case_function)(struct active_device *ad,
                 iter = latency_test_ldpc_dec(op_params->mp, bufs,
                                 op_params->ref_dec_op, op_params->vector_mask,
                                 ad->dev_id, queue_id, num_to_process,
+                               burst_sz, &total_time, &min_time, &max_time,
+                               true);
+       else
+               iter = latency_test_enc(op_params->mp, bufs,
+                                       op_params->ref_enc_op,
+                                       ad->dev_id, queue_id,
+                                       num_to_process, burst_sz, &total_time,
+                                       &min_time, &max_time);
+
+       if (iter <= 0)
+               return TEST_FAILED;
+
+       printf("Operation latency:\n"
+                       "\tavg: %lg cycles, %lg us\n"
+                       "\tmin: %lg cycles, %lg us\n"
+                       "\tmax: %lg cycles, %lg us\n",
+                       (double)total_time / (double)iter,
+                       (double)(total_time * 1000000) / (double)iter /
+                       (double)rte_get_tsc_hz(), (double)min_time,
+                       (double)(min_time * 1000000) / (double)rte_get_tsc_hz(),
+                       (double)max_time, (double)(max_time * 1000000) /
+                       (double)rte_get_tsc_hz());
+
+       return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+static int
+validation_test(struct active_device *ad,
+               struct test_op_params *op_params)
+{
+       int iter;
+       uint16_t burst_sz = op_params->burst_sz;
+       const uint16_t num_to_process = op_params->num_to_process;
+       const enum rte_bbdev_op_type op_type = test_vector.op_type;
+       const uint16_t queue_id = ad->queue_ids[0];
+       struct test_buffers *bufs = NULL;
+       struct rte_bbdev_info info;
+       uint64_t total_time, min_time, max_time;
+       const char *op_type_str;
+
+       total_time = max_time = 0;
+       min_time = UINT64_MAX;
+
+       TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS((burst_sz > MAX_BURST),
+                       "BURST_SIZE should be <= %u", MAX_BURST);
+
+       rte_bbdev_info_get(ad->dev_id, &info);
+       bufs = &op_params->q_bufs[GET_SOCKET(info.socket_id)][queue_id];
+
+       op_type_str = rte_bbdev_op_type_str(op_type);
+       TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(op_type_str, "Invalid op type: %u", op_type);
+
+       printf("+ ------------------------------------------------------- +\n");
+       printf("== test: validation\ndev: %s, burst size: %u, num ops: %u, op type: %s\n",
+                       info.dev_name, burst_sz, num_to_process, op_type_str);
+
+       if (op_type == RTE_BBDEV_OP_TURBO_DEC)
+               iter = latency_test_dec(op_params->mp, bufs,
+                               op_params->ref_dec_op, op_params->vector_mask,
+                               ad->dev_id, queue_id, num_to_process,
                                 burst_sz, &total_time, &min_time, &max_time);
+       else if (op_type == RTE_BBDEV_OP_TURBO_ENC)
+               iter = latency_test_enc(op_params->mp, bufs,
+                               op_params->ref_enc_op, ad->dev_id, queue_id,
+                               num_to_process, burst_sz, &total_time,
+                               &min_time, &max_time);
+       else if (op_type == RTE_BBDEV_OP_LDPC_ENC)
+               iter = latency_test_ldpc_enc(op_params->mp, bufs,
+                               op_params->ref_enc_op, ad->dev_id, queue_id,
+                               num_to_process, burst_sz, &total_time,
+                               &min_time, &max_time);
+       else if (op_type == RTE_BBDEV_OP_LDPC_DEC)
+               iter = latency_test_ldpc_dec(op_params->mp, bufs,
+                               op_params->ref_dec_op, op_params->vector_mask,
+                               ad->dev_id, queue_id, num_to_process,
+                               burst_sz, &total_time, &min_time, &max_time,
+                               false);
         else
                 iter = latency_test_enc(op_params->mp, bufs,
                                         op_params->ref_enc_op,
@@ -4859,6 +4937,12 @@ typedef int (test_case_function)(struct active_device *ad,
 }
 
 static int
+validation_tc(void)
+{
+       return run_test_case(validation_test);
+}
+
+static int
 interrupt_tc(void)
 {
         return run_test_case(throughput_test);
@@ -4889,7 +4973,7 @@ typedef int (test_case_function)(struct active_device *ad,
         .setup = testsuite_setup,
         .teardown = testsuite_teardown,
         .unit_test_cases = {
-               TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup, ut_teardown, latency_tc),
+               TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup, ut_teardown, validation_tc),
                 TEST_CASES_END() /**< NULL terminate unit test array */
         }
 };
-- 
1.8.3.1

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-15  9:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-19  0:05 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/7] BBDEV test updates Nicolas Chautru
2020-08-19  0:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/7] app/bbdev: add explicit ut for latency vs validation Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-15  9:49   ` Aidan Goddard [this message]
2020-09-15 10:01   ` Dave Burley
2020-08-19  0:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/7] app/bbdev: add explicit check for counters Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-15  9:53   ` Aidan Goddard
2020-09-15 10:02   ` Dave Burley
2020-08-19  0:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/7] app/bbdev: include explicit HARQ preloading Nicolas Chautru
2020-08-19  0:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/7] app/bbdev: define wait for offload Nicolas Chautru
2020-08-19  0:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/7] app/bbdev: skip bler ut when compression is used Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-15  9:55   ` Aidan Goddard
2020-09-15 10:03   ` Dave Burley
2020-08-19  0:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/7] app/bbdev: reduce duration of throughput test Nicolas Chautru
2020-08-19  0:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 7/7] app/bbdev: update offload test to dequeue full ring Nicolas Chautru
2020-09-15  9:55   ` Aidan Goddard
2020-09-15 10:05   ` Dave Burley
2020-10-07  0:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/7] BBDEV test updates Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-07  6:37   ` Akhil Goyal
2020-10-07 16:00     ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-20 16:08     ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-09-15  2:05 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3, 1/7] app/bbdev: add explicit ut for latency vs validation Liu, Tianjiao
2020-09-15  2:26 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 " Liu, Tianjiao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CWXP265MB08248C55C608A9208AFFD037F4200@CWXP265MB0824.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM \
    --to=aidan.goddard@accelercomm.com \
    --cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.burley@accelercomm.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=nicolas.chautru@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).