DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Li, Xiaoyun" <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
To: Lijun Ou <oulijun@huawei.com>, "Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"linuxarm@openeuler.org" <linuxarm@openeuler.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: support Tx mbuf free on demand cmd
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 07:46:47 +0000
Message-ID: <CY4PR11MB1750046D7C1405883C861C1E99969@CY4PR11MB1750.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1614929583-37727-1-git-send-email-oulijun@huawei.com>

Hi
Sorry, forgot to send this in last patchset.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lijun Ou <oulijun@huawei.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 5, 2021 15:33
> To: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> Cc: Li, Xiaoyun <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org;
> linuxarm@openeuler.org
> Subject: [PATCH] app/testpmd: support Tx mbuf free on demand cmd
> 
> From: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
> 
> This patch support tx_done_cleanup command:
> tx_done_cleanup port (port_id) (queue_id) (free_cnt)
> 
> User must make sure there are no concurrent access to the same Tx queue (like
> rte_eth_tx_burst, rte_eth_dev_tx_queue_stop and so on) when this command

Users ...... this command is executed.

> executed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lijun Ou <oulijun@huawei.com>
> ---
>  app/test-pmd/cmdline.c                      | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_05.rst      |  2 +
>  doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst |  7 +++
>  3 files changed, 100 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c index
> 14110eb..832ae70 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
>  #include <rte_pci.h>
>  #include <rte_ether.h>
>  #include <rte_ethdev.h>
> +#include <rte_ethdev_driver.h>
>  #include <rte_string_fns.h>
>  #include <rte_devargs.h>
>  #include <rte_flow.h>
> @@ -675,6 +676,9 @@ static void cmd_help_long_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>  			"set port (port_id) ptype_mask (ptype_mask)\n"
>  			"    set packet types classification for a specific
> port\n\n"
> 
> +			"tx_done_cleanup (port_id) (queue_id) (free_cnt)\n"
> +			"    Cleanup a tx queue's mbuf on a port\n\n"
> +
>  			"set port (port_id) queue-region region_id (value) "
>  			"queue_start_index (value) queue_num (value)\n"
>  			"    Set a queue region on a port\n\n"
> @@ -16910,6 +16914,92 @@ cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_showport_macs = {
>  	},
>  };
> 
> +/* *** tx_done_cleanup *** */
> +struct cmd_tx_done_cleanup_result {
> +	cmdline_fixed_string_t clean;
> +	cmdline_fixed_string_t port;
> +	uint16_t port_id;
> +	uint16_t queue_id;
> +	uint32_t free_cnt;
> +};
> +
> +static void
> +cmd_tx_done_cleanup_parsed(void *parsed_result,
> +			   __rte_unused struct cmdline *cl,
> +			   __rte_unused void *data)
> +{
> +	struct cmd_tx_done_cleanup_result *res = parsed_result;
> +	struct rte_eth_dev *dev;
> +	uint16_t port_id = res->port_id;
> +	uint16_t queue_id = res->queue_id;
> +	uint32_t free_cnt = res->free_cnt;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!rte_eth_dev_is_valid_port(port_id)) {
> +		printf("Invalid port_id %u\n", port_id);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
> +	if (queue_id >= dev->data->nb_tx_queues) {
> +		printf("Invalid TX queue_id %u\n", queue_id);

Tx? You just want to send a patch to use Rx/Tx. You should keep concurrency.

> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (dev->data->tx_queue_state[queue_id] !=
> +		RTE_ETH_QUEUE_STATE_STARTED) {
> +		printf("TX queue_id %u not started!\n", queue_id);

Tx?

> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * rte_eth_tx_done_cleanup is a dataplane API, user must make sure
> +	 * there are no concurrent access to the same Tx queue (like
> +	 * rte_eth_tx_burst, rte_eth_dev_tx_queue_stop and so on) when this
> API
> +	 * called.
> +	 */

And I have some concerns on this. Users cannot know about this unless they read your code. I don't think this will likely happen.
So you should document this in testpmd doc when you introduced this command.

Or maybe you can have a way to stop that to happen. Maybe checking "test_done && engine != rxonly" before this?
In your comment, the tx forwarding shouldn't happen, right? Every fwd engine except rxonly will contain tx.
Well, it's still a rough way because tx may not happen even if it's io fwd.

Maybe other people have better ideas. Otherwise, you should at least document it.
@Yigit, Ferruh What do you think? Is there a better way?

> +	ret = rte_eth_tx_done_cleanup(port_id, queue_id, free_cnt);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		printf("Failed to cleanup mbuf for port %u TX queue %u "

Tx?

> +		       "error desc: %s(%d)\n",
> +		       port_id, queue_id, strerror(-ret), ret);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	printf("Cleanup port %u TX queue %u mbuf nums: %u\n",

Tx?

> +	       port_id, queue_id, ret);
> +}
> +
> +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_tx_done_cleanup_clean =
> +	TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_tx_done_cleanup_result, clean,
> +				 "tx_done_cleanup");
> +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_tx_done_cleanup_port =
> +	TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_tx_done_cleanup_result, port,
> +				 "port");
> +cmdline_parse_token_num_t cmd_tx_done_cleanup_port_id =
> +	TOKEN_NUM_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_tx_done_cleanup_result, port_id,
> +			      UINT16);
> +cmdline_parse_token_num_t cmd_tx_done_cleanup_queue_id =
> +	TOKEN_NUM_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_tx_done_cleanup_result,
> queue_id,
> +			      UINT16);
> +cmdline_parse_token_num_t cmd_tx_done_cleanup_free_cnt =
> +	TOKEN_NUM_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_tx_done_cleanup_result,
> free_cnt,
> +			      UINT32);
> +
> +cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_tx_done_cleanup = {
> +	.f = cmd_tx_done_cleanup_parsed,
> +	.data = NULL,
> +	.help_str = "tx_done_cleanup port <port_id> <queue_id> <free_cnt>",
> +	.tokens = {
> +		(void *)&cmd_tx_done_cleanup_clean,
> +		(void *)&cmd_tx_done_cleanup_port,
> +		(void *)&cmd_tx_done_cleanup_port_id,
> +		(void *)&cmd_tx_done_cleanup_queue_id,
> +		(void *)&cmd_tx_done_cleanup_free_cnt,
> +		NULL,
> +	},
> +};
> +
>  /*
> *****************************************************************
> *************** */
> 
>  /* list of instructions */
> @@ -17035,6 +17125,7 @@ cmdline_parse_ctx_t main_ctx[] = {
>  	(cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_config_rss_reta,
>  	(cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_showport_reta,
>  	(cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_showport_macs,
> +	(cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_tx_done_cleanup,
>  	(cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_config_burst,
>  	(cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_config_thresh,
>  	(cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_config_threshold, diff --git
> a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_05.rst
> b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_05.rst
> index 23f7f0b..8077573 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_05.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_05.rst
> @@ -69,6 +69,8 @@ New Features
> 
>    * Added command to display Rx queue used descriptor count.
>      ``show port (port_id) rxq (queue_id) desc used count``
> +  * Added command to cleanup a Tx queue's mbuf on a port.
> +    ``tx_done_cleanup port <port_id> <queue_id> <free_cnt>``
> 
> 
>  Removed Items
> diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> index f59eb8a..39281f5 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> @@ -272,6 +272,13 @@ and ready to be processed by the driver on a given RX
> queue::
> 
>     testpmd> show port (port_id) rxq (queue_id) desc used count
> 
> +cleanup txq mbufs
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> +
> +Request the driver to free mbufs currently cached by the driver for a
> +given port's Tx queue::
> +   testpmd> tx_done_cleanup port (port_id) (queue_id) (free_cnt)
> +
>  show config
>  ~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> --
> 2.7.4


  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-05  7:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-05  7:33 Lijun Ou
2021-03-05  7:46 ` Li, Xiaoyun [this message]
2021-03-05  9:58   ` oulijun
2021-03-05  9:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V2] " Lijun Ou
2021-03-08 17:33   ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-03-09  8:49     ` oulijun
2021-03-09  9:53       ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-03-09  9:57         ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-09 10:18           ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-03-09 14:00         ` Aaron Conole
2021-03-09 14:13           ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-03-10  1:48         ` oulijun
2021-03-10  7:59           ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-12 10:29             ` [dpdk-dev] [Linuxarm] " oulijun
2021-03-12 11:21               ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-17 11:30                 ` oulijun
2021-03-17 12:07                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-18  3:56                     ` oulijun
2021-03-18  7:51                       ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-12 13:12   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V3] " Lijun Ou
2021-04-19  3:11     ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-04-19 12:40       ` oulijun
2021-04-19 14:56         ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-19 12:36     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V4] " Lijun Ou
2021-04-19 15:28       ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-21  1:44         ` oulijun
2021-04-21  8:09       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V5] app/test-pmd: support cleanup txq mbufs command Lijun Ou
2021-04-21  8:15         ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-21  8:32           ` oulijun
2021-04-21  8:45         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V6] " Lijun Ou
2021-04-21 11:26           ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CY4PR11MB1750046D7C1405883C861C1E99969@CY4PR11MB1750.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=xiaoyun.li@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=linuxarm@openeuler.org \
    --cc=oulijun@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git