DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kusztal, ArkadiuszX" <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>
To: "Doherty, Declan" <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"akhil.goyal@nxp.com" <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
Cc: "Trahe, Fiona" <fiona.trahe@intel.com>,
	"anoobj@marvell.com" <anoobj@marvell.com>,
	"shallyv@marvell.com" <shallyv@marvell.com>,
	"Zhang, Roy Fan" <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>,
	"Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] [RFC] cryptodev: move AES-GMAC to aead algorithms
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 04:27:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CY4PR11MB18304DB9A097F042E7AE87CF9F4B0@CY4PR11MB1830.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7ef3a611-8a58-db38-d476-d5965bb90837@intel.com>

Hi Akhil,

@Akhil: Is there a chance getting this change into 20.11?

Any more comments or anyone see any potential issues with this approach?

Regards,
Arek

-----Original Message-----
From: Doherty, Declan <declan.doherty@intel.com> 
Sent: piątek, 31 lipca 2020 16:34
To: Kusztal, ArkadiuszX <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
Cc: akhil.goyal@nxp.com; Trahe, Fiona <fiona.trahe@intel.com>; anoobj@marvell.com; shallyv@marvell.com; Zhang, Roy Fan <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] cryptodev: move AES-GMAC to aead algorithms

On 29/07/2020 3:22 PM, Arek Kusztal wrote:
> This is proposal to move AES-GMAC algorithm to AEAD set of algorithms. 
> It is however not 100% conformant GMAC as instead of aad pointer data 
> to be authenticated is passed normally and  aead.data.length field is 
> used to specify length of data to be authenticated.
> Reason behind this move is that GMAC is variant of GCM so it may 
> simplify implementations that are using these algorithms (mainly IPsec).
> AES-GMAC therefore needs to be removed from auth algorithms.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arek Kusztal <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>
> ---
..
> 

I think  this makes sense in light of how AES-GMAC support is specified in the IPsec GMAC rfc (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4543)

Acked-by: Declan Doherty <declan.doherty@intel.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-05  4:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-29 14:22 Arek Kusztal
2020-07-29 14:36 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2020-07-29 16:20 ` Trahe, Fiona
2020-07-31 14:33 ` Doherty, Declan
2020-08-05  4:27   ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX [this message]
2020-09-22 19:17     ` Akhil Goyal
2020-09-28  9:32       ` Trahe, Fiona
2020-09-01  8:13 ` Zhang, Roy Fan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CY4PR11MB18304DB9A097F042E7AE87CF9F4B0@CY4PR11MB1830.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com \
    --cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
    --cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
    --cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=fiona.trahe@intel.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=shallyv@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).