DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
To: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
	Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
	"Marko Kovacevic" <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 1/7] ethdev: add set ptype function
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 09:17:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CY4PR1801MB1863299678FAF34EA7E0B9B2DE940@CY4PR1801MB1863.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)

>On 10/9/19 6:33 PM, pbhagavatula@marvell.com wrote:
>> From: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
>>
>> Add `rte_eth_dev_set_supported_ptypes` function that will allow the
>> application to inform the PMD the packet types it is interested in.
>> Based on the ptypes set PMDs can optimize their Rx path.
>>
>> -If application doesn’t want any ptype information it can call
>> `rte_eth_dev_set_supported_ptypes(ethdev_id,
>RTE_PTYPE_UNKNOWN, NULL, 0)`
>> and PMD may skip packet type processing and set
>rte_mbuf::packet_type to
>> RTE_PTYPE_UNKNOWN.
>>
>> -If application doesn’t call `rte_eth_dev_set_supported_ptypes` PMD
>can
>> return `rte_mbuf::packet_type` with
>`rte_eth_dev_get_supported_ptypes`.
>>
>> -If application is interested only in L2/L3 layer, it can inform the PMD
>> to update `rte_mbuf::packet_type` with L2/L3 ptype by calling
>> `rte_eth_dev_set_supported_ptypes(ethdev_id,
>> 		RTE_PTYPE_L2_MASK | RTE_PTYPE_L3_MASK, NULL,
>0)`.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
>
>Sorry, but few nits below.
>
>[snip]
>
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
>b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
>> index 17d183e1f..349483707 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
>> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
>> @@ -2602,6 +2602,90 @@
>rte_eth_dev_get_supported_ptypes(uint16_t port_id, uint32_t
>ptype_mask,
>>   	return j;
>>   }
>>
>> +int
>> +rte_eth_dev_set_supported_ptypes(uint16_t port_id, uint32_t
>ptype_mask,
>> +				 uint32_t *set_ptypes, unsigned int
>num)
>> +{
>> +	const uint32_t valid_ptype_masks[] = {
>> +		RTE_PTYPE_L2_MASK,
>> +		RTE_PTYPE_L3_MASK,
>> +		RTE_PTYPE_L4_MASK,
>> +		RTE_PTYPE_TUNNEL_MASK,
>> +		RTE_PTYPE_INNER_L2_MASK,
>> +		RTE_PTYPE_INNER_L3_MASK,
>> +		RTE_PTYPE_INNER_L4_MASK,
>> +	};
>> +	const uint32_t *all_ptypes;
>> +	struct rte_eth_dev *dev;
>> +	unsigned int i, j;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, -ENODEV);
>> +	dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
>> +
>> +	if (num > 0 && set_ptypes == NULL)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	if (*dev->dev_ops->dev_supported_ptypes_get == NULL ||
>> +			*dev->dev_ops->dev_supported_ptypes_set
>== NULL) {
>> +		ret = 0;
>> +		goto ptype_unknown;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (ptype_mask == 0) {
>> +		ret = (*dev->dev_ops-
>>dev_supported_ptypes_set)(dev,
>> +				ptype_mask);
>> +		goto ptype_unknown;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i <
>sizeof(valid_ptype_masks)/sizeof(valid_ptype_masks[0]);
>
>RTE_DIM should be used instead of sizeof/sizeof

Ah! yes checkpatch was preempting me to use ARRAY_SIZE I forgot RTE_DIM exists.

>
>> +
>	i++) {
>> +		uint32_t mask = ptype_mask & valid_ptype_masks[i];
>> +		if (mask && mask != valid_ptype_masks[i]) {
>> +			ret = -EINVAL;
>> +			goto ptype_unknown;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (ptype_mask & ~RTE_PTYPE_ALL_MASK) {
>> +		ret = -EINVAL;
>> +		goto ptype_unknown;
>> +	}
>
>It does not protect against more masks added in the future and lost
>in your list above but still used in request.
>It is better just add extra variable and remove bits
>from there while masks are checked in the loop. Then it should be
>checked here that the mask is 0 (no bits are left and everything is
>checked).
>

Makes sense, as it would probably break if future updates to ptype_masks 
are not added to the above list. 

I will roll a v11.

Thanks,
Pavan.

>> +
>> +	all_ptypes = (*dev->dev_ops-
>>dev_supported_ptypes_get)(dev);
>> +	if (all_ptypes == NULL) {
>> +		ret = 0;
>> +		goto ptype_unknown;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Accodommodate as many set_ptypes as possible. If the
>supplied
>> +	 * set_ptypes array is insufficient fill it partially.
>> +	 */
>> +	for (i = 0, j = 0; set_ptypes != NULL &&
>> +				(all_ptypes[i] !=
>RTE_PTYPE_UNKNOWN); ++i) {
>> +		if (ptype_mask & all_ptypes[i]) {
>> +			if (j < num - 1) {
>> +				set_ptypes[j] = all_ptypes[i];
>> +				j++;
>> +				continue;
>> +			}
>> +			break;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (set_ptypes != NULL && j < num)
>> +		set_ptypes[j] = RTE_PTYPE_UNKNOWN;
>> +
>> +	return (*dev->dev_ops->dev_supported_ptypes_set)(dev,
>ptype_mask);
>> +
>> +ptype_unknown:
>> +	if (num > 0)
>> +		set_ptypes[0] = RTE_PTYPE_UNKNOWN;
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>>   void
>>   rte_eth_macaddr_get(uint16_t port_id, struct rte_ether_addr
>*mac_addr)
>>   {
>
>[snip]

             reply	other threads:[~2019-10-10  9:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-10  9:17 Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-10-07  6:51 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/7] ethdev: add new Rx offload flags pbhagavatula
2019-10-09 15:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 " pbhagavatula
2019-10-09 15:33   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 1/7] ethdev: add set ptype function pbhagavatula
2019-10-10  8:46     ` Andrew Rybchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CY4PR1801MB1863299678FAF34EA7E0B9B2DE940@CY4PR1801MB1863.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=pbhagavatula@marvell.com \
    --cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
    --cc=marko.kovacevic@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).