From: "Ye, MingjinX" <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Yang, Qiming" <qiming.yang@intel.com>,
"Zhou, YidingX" <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] app/test: secondary process passes allow parameters
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 10:09:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CY8PR11MB7136F6E5A127B6825472E4B2E5FCA@CY8PR11MB7136.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8w-F7-KEcj_WbSVaSf77HW_1OMR8sqn+P5SMmdTCb8hkQ@mail.gmail.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> Sent: Monday, September 25, 2023 5:58 PM
> To: Ye, MingjinX <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Yang, Qiming <qiming.yang@intel.com>; Zhou, YidingX
> <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] app/test: secondary process passes allow
> parameters
>
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 11:54 AM Mingjin Ye <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > In EAL related test cases, the allow parameters are not passed to the
> > secondary process, resulting in unexpected NICs being loaded.
> >
> > This patch fixes this issue by appending the allow parameters to the
> > secondary process.
>
> This patch looks wrong.
>
> Can you provide a description of the issue?
CI/Checkpatch a warning has appeared. Marked as Superseded.
The new patch will replace it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-25 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-05 9:35 [PATCH] child process synchronization NIC startup parameters Kaisen You
2023-07-06 2:16 ` Yang, Qiming
2023-07-07 1:21 ` You, KaisenX
2023-07-06 19:07 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-07-14 5:59 ` [PATCH v2] app/test:subprocess synchronization of parameters Kaisen You
2023-07-17 1:47 ` Kaisen You
2023-07-26 2:39 ` Kaisen You
2023-09-25 9:42 ` [PATCH v3] app/test: secondary process passes allow parameters Mingjin Ye
2023-09-25 9:58 ` David Marchand
2023-09-25 10:09 ` Ye, MingjinX [this message]
2023-09-25 10:19 ` David Marchand
2023-09-27 3:42 ` [PATCH v4] app/test: append 'allow' parameters to secondary processes Mingjin Ye
2023-10-13 2:47 ` Huang, ZhiminX
2023-11-09 11:13 ` Bruce Richardson
2023-11-10 10:30 ` [PATCH v5] app/test: secondary process passes allow parameters Mingjin Ye
2023-11-10 11:18 ` Bruce Richardson
2023-11-13 10:42 ` [PATCH v6] " Mingjin Ye
2023-11-13 11:11 ` Bruce Richardson
2023-11-14 10:28 ` [PATCH v7] " Mingjin Ye
2023-11-17 10:05 ` Huang, ZhiminX
2023-11-17 10:24 ` Ye, MingjinX
2023-11-17 11:17 ` Bruce Richardson
2023-11-24 10:28 ` Ye, MingjinX
2024-03-06 13:50 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CY8PR11MB7136F6E5A127B6825472E4B2E5FCA@CY8PR11MB7136.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=mingjinx.ye@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=qiming.yang@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=yidingx.zhou@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).