From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cunming.liang@intel.com>
Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0674358DD
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri,  9 Jan 2015 10:46:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26])
 by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Jan 2015 01:42:49 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,729,1413270000"; d="scan'208";a="659226100"
Received: from pgsmsx101.gar.corp.intel.com ([10.221.44.78])
 by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Jan 2015 01:46:12 -0800
Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.70) by
 PGSMSX101.gar.corp.intel.com (10.221.44.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 14.3.195.1; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 17:45:39 +0800
Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.216]) by
 SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.182]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001;
 Fri, 9 Jan 2015 17:45:38 +0800
From: "Liang, Cunming" <cunming.liang@intel.com>
To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>, Stephen Hemminger
 <stephen@networkplumber.org>, "Richardson, Bruce"
 <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/7] support multi-phtread per lcore
Thread-Index: AQHQFObgfmq64AgbV0e+OTw3KgLpHZyJoZWAgAGfW9CABL60AIAAkFJwgAQ6C4CAAV5A0IAADfiAgASiO/CAAA/UgIAAkhMAgAGGYrCAGRoLAIABnT6g
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 09:45:37 +0000
Message-ID: <D0158A423229094DA7ABF71CF2FA0DA311894BB3@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
References: <1418263490-21088-1-git-send-email-cunming.liang@intel.com>
 <7C4248CAE043B144B1CD242D275626532FE15298@IRSMSX104.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <D0158A423229094DA7ABF71CF2FA0DA31188B881@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <7C4248CAE043B144B1CD242D275626532FE232BA@IRSMSX104.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <D0158A423229094DA7ABF71CF2FA0DA31188C928@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <7C4248CAE043B144B1CD242D275626532FE27C3B@IRSMSX104.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <D0158A423229094DA7ABF71CF2FA0DA31188E454@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <20141219100342.GA3848@bricha3-MOBL3>
 <D0158A423229094DA7ABF71CF2FA0DA31188EF9F@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <20141222094603.GA1768@bricha3-MOBL3> <20141222102852.7e6d5e81@urahara>
 <D0158A423229094DA7ABF71CF2FA0DA31188F9AD@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258213D39EA@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258213D39EA@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/7] support multi-phtread per lcore
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 09:46:15 -0000

>=20
> BTW, one more thing: while we are on it  - it is probably a good time to =
do
> something with our interrupt thread?
> It is a bit strange that we can't use rte_pktmbuf_free() or
> rte_spinlock_recursive_lock() from our own interrupt/alarm handlers
>=20
> Konstantin
[Liang, Cunming] I'll think about it.