DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] test: add ut for eal flags --lcores
@ 2015-02-15  5:47 Cunming Liang
  2015-02-15  6:58 ` Qiu, Michael
  2015-02-24 19:03 ` Thomas Monjalon
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Cunming Liang @ 2015-02-15  5:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev

The patch add unit test for the new eal option "--lcores".

Signed-off-by: Cunming Liang <cunming.liang@intel.com>
---
 It depends on the previous patch which enabling EAL "--lcores" option.
 http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-February/013204.html

 app/test/test_eal_flags.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_eal_flags.c b/app/test/test_eal_flags.c
index 0a8269c..0352f87 100644
--- a/app/test/test_eal_flags.c
+++ b/app/test/test_eal_flags.c
@@ -512,47 +512,114 @@ test_missing_c_flag(void)
 
 	/* -c flag but no coremask value */
 	const char *argv1[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-c"};
-	/* No -c or -l flag at all */
+	/* No -c, -l or --lcores flag at all */
 	const char *argv2[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3"};
 	/* bad coremask value */
-	const char *argv3[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-c", "error" };
+	const char *argv3[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+				"-n", "3", "-c", "error" };
 	/* sanity check of tests - valid coremask value */
-	const char *argv4[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-c", "1" };
+	const char *argv4[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+				"-n", "3", "-c", "1" };
 	/* -l flag but no corelist value */
-	const char *argv5[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l"};
-	const char *argv6[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", " " };
+	const char *argv5[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+				"-n", "3", "-l"};
+	const char *argv6[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+				"-n", "3", "-l", " " };
 	/* bad corelist values */
-	const char *argv7[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "error" };
-	const char *argv8[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "1-" };
-	const char *argv9[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "1," };
-	const char *argv10[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "1#2" };
+	const char *argv7[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+				"-n", "3", "-l", "error" };
+	const char *argv8[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+				"-n", "3", "-l", "1-" };
+	const char *argv9[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+				"-n", "3", "-l", "1," };
+	const char *argv10[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+				 "-n", "3", "-l", "1#2" };
 	/* sanity check test - valid corelist value */
-	const char *argv11[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "1-2,3" };
+	const char *argv11[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+				 "-n", "3", "-l", "1-2,3" };
+
+	/* --lcores flag but no lcores value */
+	const char *argv12[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+				 "-n", "3", "--lcores" };
+	const char *argv13[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+				 "-n", "3", "--lcores", " " };
+	/* bad lcores value */
+	const char *argv14[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+				 "-n", "3", "--lcores", "1-3-5" };
+	const char *argv15[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+				 "-n", "3", "--lcores", "0-1,,2" };
+	const char *argv16[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+				 "-n", "3", "--lcores", "0-,1" };
+	const char *argv17[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+				 "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(0-,2-4)" };
+	const char *argv18[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+				 "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(-1,2)" };
+	const char *argv19[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+				 "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(2-4)@(2-4-6)" };
+	const char *argv20[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+				 "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(a,2)" };
+	const char *argv21[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+				 "-n", "3", "--lcores", "1-3@(1,3)" };
+	const char *argv22[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+				 "-n", "3", "--lcores", "3@((1,3)" };
+	const char *argv23[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+				 "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(4-7)=(1,3)" };
+	const char *argv24[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+				 "-n", "3", "--lcores", "[4-7]@(1,3)" };
+	/* sanity check of tests - valid lcores value */
+	const char *argv25[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+				 "-n", "3", "--lcores",
+				 "0-1,2@(5-7),(3-5)@(0,2),(0,6),7"};
 
 	if (launch_proc(argv1) == 0
 			|| launch_proc(argv2) == 0
 			|| launch_proc(argv3) == 0) {
-		printf("Error - process ran without error when missing -c flag\n");
+		printf("Error - "
+		       "process ran without error when missing -c flag\n");
 		return -1;
 	}
 	if (launch_proc(argv4) != 0) {
-		printf("Error - process did not run ok with valid coremask value\n");
+		printf("Error - "
+		       "process did not run ok with valid coremask value\n");
 		return -1;
 	}
 
+	/* start -l test */
 	if (launch_proc(argv5) == 0
 			|| launch_proc(argv6) == 0
 			|| launch_proc(argv7) == 0
 			|| launch_proc(argv8) == 0
 			|| launch_proc(argv9) == 0
 			|| launch_proc(argv10) == 0) {
-		printf("Error - process ran without error with invalid -l flag\n");
+		printf("Error - "
+		       "process ran without error with invalid -l flag\n");
 		return -1;
 	}
 	if (launch_proc(argv11) != 0) {
-		printf("Error - process did not run ok with valid corelist value\n");
+		printf("Error - "
+		       "process did not run ok with valid corelist value\n");
 		return -1;
 	}
+
+	/* start --lcores tests */
+	if (launch_proc(argv12) == 0 || launch_proc(argv13) == 0 ||
+	    launch_proc(argv14) == 0 || launch_proc(argv15) == 0 ||
+	    launch_proc(argv16) == 0 || launch_proc(argv17) == 0 ||
+	    launch_proc(argv18) == 0 || launch_proc(argv19) == 0 ||
+	    launch_proc(argv20) == 0 || launch_proc(argv21) == 0 ||
+	    launch_proc(argv21) == 0 || launch_proc(argv22) == 0 ||
+	    launch_proc(argv23) == 0 || launch_proc(argv24) == 0) {
+		printf("Error - "
+		       "process ran without error with invalid --lcore flag\n");
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	if (launch_proc(argv25) != 0) {
+		printf("Error - "
+		       "process did not run ok with valid corelist value\n");
+		return -1;
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
1.8.1.4

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] test: add ut for eal flags --lcores
  2015-02-15  5:47 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] test: add ut for eal flags --lcores Cunming Liang
@ 2015-02-15  6:58 ` Qiu, Michael
  2015-02-15  8:32   ` Liang, Cunming
  2015-02-24 19:03 ` Thomas Monjalon
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Qiu, Michael @ 2015-02-15  6:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Liang, Cunming, dev

Hi, Steve

Why not post this patch within your enabling EAL "--lcores" option patch
set?
As it is not merged yet.

Just a suggestion, depends you.

Thanks,
Michael
On 2/15/2015 1:48 PM, Cunming Liang wrote:
> The patch add unit test for the new eal option "--lcores".
>
> Signed-off-by: Cunming Liang <cunming.liang@intel.com>
> ---
>  It depends on the previous patch which enabling EAL "--lcores" option.
>  http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-February/013204.html
>
>  app/test/test_eal_flags.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test/test_eal_flags.c b/app/test/test_eal_flags.c
> index 0a8269c..0352f87 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_eal_flags.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_eal_flags.c
> @@ -512,47 +512,114 @@ test_missing_c_flag(void)
>  
>  	/* -c flag but no coremask value */
>  	const char *argv1[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-c"};
> -	/* No -c or -l flag at all */
> +	/* No -c, -l or --lcores flag at all */
>  	const char *argv2[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3"};
>  	/* bad coremask value */
> -	const char *argv3[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-c", "error" };
> +	const char *argv3[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> +				"-n", "3", "-c", "error" };
>  	/* sanity check of tests - valid coremask value */
> -	const char *argv4[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-c", "1" };
> +	const char *argv4[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> +				"-n", "3", "-c", "1" };
>  	/* -l flag but no corelist value */
> -	const char *argv5[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l"};
> -	const char *argv6[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", " " };
> +	const char *argv5[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> +				"-n", "3", "-l"};
> +	const char *argv6[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> +				"-n", "3", "-l", " " };
>  	/* bad corelist values */
> -	const char *argv7[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "error" };
> -	const char *argv8[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "1-" };
> -	const char *argv9[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "1," };
> -	const char *argv10[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "1#2" };
> +	const char *argv7[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> +				"-n", "3", "-l", "error" };
> +	const char *argv8[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> +				"-n", "3", "-l", "1-" };
> +	const char *argv9[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> +				"-n", "3", "-l", "1," };
> +	const char *argv10[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> +				 "-n", "3", "-l", "1#2" };
>  	/* sanity check test - valid corelist value */
> -	const char *argv11[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "1-2,3" };
> +	const char *argv11[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> +				 "-n", "3", "-l", "1-2,3" };
> +
> +	/* --lcores flag but no lcores value */
> +	const char *argv12[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> +				 "-n", "3", "--lcores" };
> +	const char *argv13[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> +				 "-n", "3", "--lcores", " " };
> +	/* bad lcores value */
> +	const char *argv14[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> +				 "-n", "3", "--lcores", "1-3-5" };
> +	const char *argv15[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> +				 "-n", "3", "--lcores", "0-1,,2" };
> +	const char *argv16[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> +				 "-n", "3", "--lcores", "0-,1" };
> +	const char *argv17[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> +				 "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(0-,2-4)" };
> +	const char *argv18[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> +				 "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(-1,2)" };
> +	const char *argv19[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> +				 "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(2-4)@(2-4-6)" };
> +	const char *argv20[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> +				 "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(a,2)" };
> +	const char *argv21[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> +				 "-n", "3", "--lcores", "1-3@(1,3)" };
> +	const char *argv22[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> +				 "-n", "3", "--lcores", "3@((1,3)" };
> +	const char *argv23[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> +				 "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(4-7)=(1,3)" };
> +	const char *argv24[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> +				 "-n", "3", "--lcores", "[4-7]@(1,3)" };
> +	/* sanity check of tests - valid lcores value */
> +	const char *argv25[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> +				 "-n", "3", "--lcores",
> +				 "0-1,2@(5-7),(3-5)@(0,2),(0,6),7"};
>  
>  	if (launch_proc(argv1) == 0
>  			|| launch_proc(argv2) == 0
>  			|| launch_proc(argv3) == 0) {
> -		printf("Error - process ran without error when missing -c flag\n");
> +		printf("Error - "
> +		       "process ran without error when missing -c flag\n");
>  		return -1;
>  	}
>  	if (launch_proc(argv4) != 0) {
> -		printf("Error - process did not run ok with valid coremask value\n");
> +		printf("Error - "
> +		       "process did not run ok with valid coremask value\n");
>  		return -1;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* start -l test */
>  	if (launch_proc(argv5) == 0
>  			|| launch_proc(argv6) == 0
>  			|| launch_proc(argv7) == 0
>  			|| launch_proc(argv8) == 0
>  			|| launch_proc(argv9) == 0
>  			|| launch_proc(argv10) == 0) {
> -		printf("Error - process ran without error with invalid -l flag\n");
> +		printf("Error - "
> +		       "process ran without error with invalid -l flag\n");
>  		return -1;
>  	}
>  	if (launch_proc(argv11) != 0) {
> -		printf("Error - process did not run ok with valid corelist value\n");
> +		printf("Error - "
> +		       "process did not run ok with valid corelist value\n");
>  		return -1;
>  	}
> +
> +	/* start --lcores tests */
> +	if (launch_proc(argv12) == 0 || launch_proc(argv13) == 0 ||
> +	    launch_proc(argv14) == 0 || launch_proc(argv15) == 0 ||
> +	    launch_proc(argv16) == 0 || launch_proc(argv17) == 0 ||
> +	    launch_proc(argv18) == 0 || launch_proc(argv19) == 0 ||
> +	    launch_proc(argv20) == 0 || launch_proc(argv21) == 0 ||
> +	    launch_proc(argv21) == 0 || launch_proc(argv22) == 0 ||
> +	    launch_proc(argv23) == 0 || launch_proc(argv24) == 0) {
> +		printf("Error - "
> +		       "process ran without error with invalid --lcore flag\n");
> +		return -1;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (launch_proc(argv25) != 0) {
> +		printf("Error - "
> +		       "process did not run ok with valid corelist value\n");
> +		return -1;
> +	}
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] test: add ut for eal flags --lcores
  2015-02-15  6:58 ` Qiu, Michael
@ 2015-02-15  8:32   ` Liang, Cunming
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Liang, Cunming @ 2015-02-15  8:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Qiu, Michael, dev

Hi,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Qiu, Michael
> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 2:59 PM
> To: Liang, Cunming; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] test: add ut for eal flags --lcores
> 
> Hi, Steve
> 
> Why not post this patch within your enabling EAL "--lcores" option patch
> set?
> As it is not merged yet.
> 
[LCM] As that patch series already go through several round review, I won't expect to involve the totally new update on it.
 
> Just a suggestion, depends you.
> 
> Thanks,
> Michael
> On 2/15/2015 1:48 PM, Cunming Liang wrote:
> > The patch add unit test for the new eal option "--lcores".
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cunming Liang <cunming.liang@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  It depends on the previous patch which enabling EAL "--lcores" option.
> >  http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-February/013204.html
> >
> >  app/test/test_eal_flags.c | 95
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test/test_eal_flags.c b/app/test/test_eal_flags.c
> > index 0a8269c..0352f87 100644
> > --- a/app/test/test_eal_flags.c
> > +++ b/app/test/test_eal_flags.c
> > @@ -512,47 +512,114 @@ test_missing_c_flag(void)
> >
> >  	/* -c flag but no coremask value */
> >  	const char *argv1[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-c"};
> > -	/* No -c or -l flag at all */
> > +	/* No -c, -l or --lcores flag at all */
> >  	const char *argv2[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3"};
> >  	/* bad coremask value */
> > -	const char *argv3[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-c", "error" };
> > +	const char *argv3[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > +				"-n", "3", "-c", "error" };
> >  	/* sanity check of tests - valid coremask value */
> > -	const char *argv4[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-c", "1" };
> > +	const char *argv4[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > +				"-n", "3", "-c", "1" };
> >  	/* -l flag but no corelist value */
> > -	const char *argv5[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l"};
> > -	const char *argv6[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", " " };
> > +	const char *argv5[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > +				"-n", "3", "-l"};
> > +	const char *argv6[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > +				"-n", "3", "-l", " " };
> >  	/* bad corelist values */
> > -	const char *argv7[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "error" };
> > -	const char *argv8[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "1-" };
> > -	const char *argv9[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "1," };
> > -	const char *argv10[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "1#2" };
> > +	const char *argv7[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > +				"-n", "3", "-l", "error" };
> > +	const char *argv8[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > +				"-n", "3", "-l", "1-" };
> > +	const char *argv9[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > +				"-n", "3", "-l", "1," };
> > +	const char *argv10[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > +				 "-n", "3", "-l", "1#2" };
> >  	/* sanity check test - valid corelist value */
> > -	const char *argv11[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "1-2,3" };
> > +	const char *argv11[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > +				 "-n", "3", "-l", "1-2,3" };
> > +
> > +	/* --lcores flag but no lcores value */
> > +	const char *argv12[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > +				 "-n", "3", "--lcores" };
> > +	const char *argv13[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > +				 "-n", "3", "--lcores", " " };
> > +	/* bad lcores value */
> > +	const char *argv14[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > +				 "-n", "3", "--lcores", "1-3-5" };
> > +	const char *argv15[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > +				 "-n", "3", "--lcores", "0-1,,2" };
> > +	const char *argv16[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > +				 "-n", "3", "--lcores", "0-,1" };
> > +	const char *argv17[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > +				 "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(0-,2-4)" };
> > +	const char *argv18[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > +				 "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(-1,2)" };
> > +	const char *argv19[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > +				 "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(2-4)@(2-4-6)" };
> > +	const char *argv20[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > +				 "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(a,2)" };
> > +	const char *argv21[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > +				 "-n", "3", "--lcores", "1-3@(1,3)" };
> > +	const char *argv22[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > +				 "-n", "3", "--lcores", "3@((1,3)" };
> > +	const char *argv23[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > +				 "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(4-7)=(1,3)" };
> > +	const char *argv24[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > +				 "-n", "3", "--lcores", "[4-7]@(1,3)" };
> > +	/* sanity check of tests - valid lcores value */
> > +	const char *argv25[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > +				 "-n", "3", "--lcores",
> > +				 "0-1,2@(5-7),(3-5)@(0,2),(0,6),7"};
> >
> >  	if (launch_proc(argv1) == 0
> >  			|| launch_proc(argv2) == 0
> >  			|| launch_proc(argv3) == 0) {
> > -		printf("Error - process ran without error when missing -c flag\n");
> > +		printf("Error - "
> > +		       "process ran without error when missing -c flag\n");
> >  		return -1;
> >  	}
> >  	if (launch_proc(argv4) != 0) {
> > -		printf("Error - process did not run ok with valid coremask
> value\n");
> > +		printf("Error - "
> > +		       "process did not run ok with valid coremask value\n");
> >  		return -1;
> >  	}
> >
> > +	/* start -l test */
> >  	if (launch_proc(argv5) == 0
> >  			|| launch_proc(argv6) == 0
> >  			|| launch_proc(argv7) == 0
> >  			|| launch_proc(argv8) == 0
> >  			|| launch_proc(argv9) == 0
> >  			|| launch_proc(argv10) == 0) {
> > -		printf("Error - process ran without error with invalid -l flag\n");
> > +		printf("Error - "
> > +		       "process ran without error with invalid -l flag\n");
> >  		return -1;
> >  	}
> >  	if (launch_proc(argv11) != 0) {
> > -		printf("Error - process did not run ok with valid corelist value\n");
> > +		printf("Error - "
> > +		       "process did not run ok with valid corelist value\n");
> >  		return -1;
> >  	}
> > +
> > +	/* start --lcores tests */
> > +	if (launch_proc(argv12) == 0 || launch_proc(argv13) == 0 ||
> > +	    launch_proc(argv14) == 0 || launch_proc(argv15) == 0 ||
> > +	    launch_proc(argv16) == 0 || launch_proc(argv17) == 0 ||
> > +	    launch_proc(argv18) == 0 || launch_proc(argv19) == 0 ||
> > +	    launch_proc(argv20) == 0 || launch_proc(argv21) == 0 ||
> > +	    launch_proc(argv21) == 0 || launch_proc(argv22) == 0 ||
> > +	    launch_proc(argv23) == 0 || launch_proc(argv24) == 0) {
> > +		printf("Error - "
> > +		       "process ran without error with invalid --lcore flag\n");
> > +		return -1;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (launch_proc(argv25) != 0) {
> > +		printf("Error - "
> > +		       "process did not run ok with valid corelist value\n");
> > +		return -1;
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] test: add ut for eal flags --lcores
  2015-02-15  5:47 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] test: add ut for eal flags --lcores Cunming Liang
  2015-02-15  6:58 ` Qiu, Michael
@ 2015-02-24 19:03 ` Thomas Monjalon
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2015-02-24 19:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Cunming Liang; +Cc: dev

2015-02-15 13:47, Cunming Liang:
> The patch add unit test for the new eal option "--lcores".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cunming Liang <cunming.liang@intel.com>
> ---
>  It depends on the previous patch which enabling EAL "--lcores" option.
>  http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-February/013204.html

Applied, thanks

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-02-24 19:04 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-02-15  5:47 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] test: add ut for eal flags --lcores Cunming Liang
2015-02-15  6:58 ` Qiu, Michael
2015-02-15  8:32   ` Liang, Cunming
2015-02-24 19:03 ` Thomas Monjalon

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).