From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <keith.wiles@intel.com>
Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C91AA58C3
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 23:02:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48])
 by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Sep 2016 14:02:32 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,379,1470726000"; d="scan'208";a="172107622"
Received: from fmsmsx103.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.201])
 by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Sep 2016 14:02:32 -0700
Received: from fmsmsx113.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.13.12]) by
 FMSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.201]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002;
 Thu, 22 Sep 2016 14:02:32 -0700
From: "Wiles, Keith" <keith.wiles@intel.com>
To: Caianning <caianning@huawei.com>
CC: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Houzhipeng <houzhipeng@huawei.com>
Thread-Topic: [Pktgen] can we set ethType for RANGE_PKT?
Thread-Index: AdIUzT+1xRVMeI2hQxiSnekF0cyWrwAggQGA
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 21:02:31 +0000
Message-ID: <D044A785-A5DA-4968-91A9-6C0EDE126450@intel.com>
References: <F994AE62EFA2864BAC5A2B81D86C27C13E2D687E@nkgeml514-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <F994AE62EFA2864BAC5A2B81D86C27C13E2D687E@nkgeml514-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.254.112.208]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <068FB95D0338F945BE4ADAD8ACA28001@intel.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [Pktgen] can we set ethType for RANGE_PKT?
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 21:02:34 -0000


Regards,
Keith

> On Sep 22, 2016, at 8:31 AM, Caianning <caianning@huawei.com> wrote:
>=20
> Hi
>         I am doing a test using RANGE_PKT. I note that the function pktge=
n_set_pkt_type_range() is given, but it is not called. And there is pktgen_=
set_pkt_type() for SINGLE_PKT.
>=20
>         I guess I a pktgen_set_pkt_type() should call for both SINGLE_PKT=
 and RANGE_PKT. Am I right?
>=20
> But again, Where should the function be called? And is there a plan for i=
t?

Please add [Pktgen] to the subject line on your next email.

What version of Pktgen are you using, I remember fixing something like this=
 problem recently. I am not at home and can not access my machine or down l=
oad Pktgen ATM.

>=20
>         Thanks.