From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E127B47E for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 18:29:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Feb 2015 09:25:04 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,603,1418112000"; d="scan'208";a="529368792" Received: from orsmsx101.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.225.128]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Feb 2015 09:20:25 -0800 Received: from orsmsx114.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.240.10) by ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.225.128) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 09:29:03 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx119.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.207) by ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.240.10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 09:29:03 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx113.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.13.112]) by FMSMSX119.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.14.200]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 09:29:02 -0800 From: "Wiles, Keith" To: Thomas Monjalon Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] fm10k_rxtx.c does not compile Thread-Index: AQHQS5yQvwGACHfZe0qdwBzhlVF8W5z3LLOA//+eX4A= Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 17:29:02 +0000 Message-ID: References: <4252267.lcD9EdtIU9@xps13> In-Reply-To: <4252267.lcD9EdtIU9@xps13> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.255.34.223] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] fm10k_rxtx.c does not compile X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 17:29:36 -0000 I believe Jeff @ Intel is going to submit a patch soon. On 2/18/15, 11:18 AM, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote: >Hi Keith, > >2015-02-18 17:01, Wiles, Keith: >> I just pulled the code and found a unused function error =8Cdump_rxd()= =B9 >>=20 >> I had to add the ifdef around the function and remove the ifdef inside >>the function: >>=20 >> #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_FM10K_DEBUG_RX >> static inline void dump_rxd(union fm10k_rx_desc *rxd) >> { >> RTE_SET_USED(rxd); >> PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "+----------------|----------------+"); >> PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "| GLORT | PKT HDR & TYPE |"); >> PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "| 0x%08x | 0x%08x |", rxd->d.glort, >> rxd->d.data); >> PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "+----------------|----------------+"); >> PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "| VLAN & LEN | STATUS |"); >> PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "| 0x%08x | 0x%08x |", rxd->d.vlan_len, >> rxd->d.staterr); >> PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "+----------------|----------------+"); >> PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "| RESERVED | RSS_HASH |"); >> PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "| 0x%08x | 0x%08x |", 0, rxd->d.rss); >> PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "+----------------|----------------+"); >> PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "| TIME TAG |"); >> PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "| 0x%016lx |", rxd->q.timestamp); >> PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "+----------------|----------------+"); >> } >> #endif >>=20 >> Also clang on Ubuntu 14.04 does not like the option: >> CC fm10k_pf.o >> error: unknown warning option '-Wno-unused-but-set-variable'; did you >>mean '-Wno-unused-const-variable'? [-Werror,-Wunknown-warning-option] > >Thanks for reporting. >I have no error with GCC 4.9.2. >Please could you try to send a patch?