DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Wiles, Keith" <keith.wiles@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>,
	"Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio" <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Simplify the ifdefs in rte.app.mk.
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 14:05:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <D1664F3C.1E3F3%keith.wiles@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+PrjLFdSMyzNcrvD4cU_PPSXQSbot+cTSrfPrGJCaRwLebzEg@mail.gmail.com>



On 4/29/15, 6:51 AM, "Thomas Monjalon" <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> wrote:

>2015-04-29 13:08 GMT+02:00 Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
><sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>:
>> On 29/04/2015 11:12, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> It seems this is the second version of your patch.
>>> Please add v2 prefix and a changelog to ease review and
>>> patch management.
>>> As you probably know, it is explained here:
>>>      http://dpdk.org/dev#send
>>
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> Just to clarify as I tend to use RFC PATCH as well, do we still mark it
>>as
>> v2 even though the first patch was an RFC PATCH?
>
>Yes it's clearer to include RFC PATCH in versioning.
>RFC is only a keyword to highlight the desire of debating and/or
>improving with review comments.
>So I think RFC patch should be considered as the number one. Adding v1
>is possible.

OK, will send a new patch with the correct version.
>

      reply	other threads:[~2015-04-29 14:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-28 17:03 Keith Wiles
2015-04-29 10:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-04-29 11:08   ` Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
2015-04-29 11:51     ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-04-29 14:05       ` Wiles, Keith [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=D1664F3C.1E3F3%keith.wiles@intel.com \
    --to=keith.wiles@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).