From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCDFBCBCC for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:55:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Apr 2015 07:55:48 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,677,1422950400"; d="scan'208";a="487710413" Received: from orsmsx103.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.225.130]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Apr 2015 07:55:48 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx102.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.200) by ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.225.130) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 07:55:48 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx113.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.13.26]) by FMSMSX102.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.10.177]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 07:55:47 -0700 From: "Wiles, Keith" To: "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: NO_AUTOLIB is this variable really needed? Thread-Index: AQHQg1W9IwtYMIfV5EuJPr/G1qLkog== Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 14:55:47 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.252.204.210] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [dpdk-dev] NO_AUTOLIB is this variable really needed? X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 14:55:51 -0000 What is the NO_AUTOLIB variable used for anyway, the doc states this: * NO_AUTOLIBS: If set, the libraries provided by the framework will not be included in the LDLIBS variable automatically. Why was this variable created, do we have really good reason? It seems like the variable removes almost all of the standard libs. Regards, ++Keith