From: "Wiles, Keith" <keith.wiles@intel.com>
To: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Beyond DPDK 2.0
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 21:31:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D1680195.1E739%keith.wiles@intel.com> (raw)
(I snipped out the content here only because it had been snipped a lot
already)
Sorry, if I am highjacking the thread.
I believe the DPDK community would benefit from moving to GitHub as the
primary DPDK site. http://github.com
I believe the DPDK community can benefit from being at a very well know
world wide site. GitHub seems to have the most eyes of any of the open
source Git repos today and it appears they have more then twice as many
developers. GitHub has a number of features I see as some good additions to
our community using the GitHub organization account type.
The cost for an organization account is $0 as long as we do not need more
then 5 private repos. 10 private repos is $25/month and had other plans
for more. I do not see us needing more then 5 private repos today and the
only reason I can see having a private repo is to do some prep work on the
repo before making public. Every contributor would need to create a GitHub
personal account, which is at no cost unless you need more then 5 private
repos. In both accounts you can have unlimited public repos.
https://help.github.com/articles/where-can-i-find-open-source-projects-to-w
ork-on/
http://www.sitepoint.com/using-git-open-source-projects/
- Adding more committers can lead to a security problems for 6Wind (I
assume).
- 6Wind appearing to own DPDK.org is not a good message to the community.
- Not assuming 6Wind¹s dpdk.org site will disappear only where the
community stores the master repos and how the community interacts with the
master.
- Permission and access levels in dpdk.org is only one level and we can
benefit from having 4 levels and teams as well.
- The patch process today suffers from timely reviews, which will not be
fixed by moving.
- GitHub has a per pull request discussions area, which gives a clean
way to
review all discussions on a specific change.
- The current patch model is clone dpdk.org/modify/commit/send patch
set
- The model with GitHub is fork on GitHub/modify/commit/send pull
request
- The patchwork web site is reasonable, but has some draw backs in
maintaining the site.
- GitHub manages the patches via pull requests and can be easily seen
via a web browser.
- The down side is you do have to use a web browser to do some work, but
the everyday work would be done as it is today.
- I think we all have a web browser now :-)
- GitHub has team support and gives a group better control plus
collaboration is much easier as we have a external location to work.
- Most companies have some pretty high security level and being to
collaborate between two or more companies is very difficult if one company
is hosting the repo behind a firewall.
- Using GitHub and teams would make collaboration a lot easier or
collaboration between two or more user accounts as well.
- GitHub has a Web Page system, which can be customized for the community
needs via a public or private repo.
- We still need a dpdk.org email list I believe as I did not find one at
GitHub.
- We can also forward GitHub emails to the list.
- I believe you can reply to an email from GitHub and the email will get
appended to the discussion thread.
As most do not like to read long emails :-) I will stop here and add one
more thing.
I have create a sandbox on GitHub for anyone to play with using GitHub.
You will need to create a GitHub account and an email me your account name
to add you to the organization site as a contributor.
The GitHub site is not a fork of dpdk.org only a sandbox to play with how
GitHub can help the community to gain more developers in a clean manner.
Regards
++Keith
next reply other threads:[~2015-04-30 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-30 21:31 Wiles, Keith [this message]
2015-04-30 21:38 ` Wiles, Keith
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-04-16 10:38 O'Driscoll, Tim
2015-04-22 15:11 ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2015-04-22 15:33 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-04-23 11:36 ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2015-04-24 21:02 ` Dave Neary
2015-05-07 14:02 ` Avi Kivity
2015-05-07 14:34 ` Ivan Boule
2015-05-07 15:27 ` Wiles, Keith
2015-05-07 15:33 ` Avi Kivity
2015-05-07 15:33 ` Avi Kivity
2015-05-07 15:49 ` Wiles, Keith
2015-05-07 16:05 ` Avi Kivity
2015-05-08 4:16 ` Wiles, Keith
2015-05-08 5:29 ` Luke Gorrie
2015-05-08 9:06 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-05-08 9:32 ` Luke Gorrie
2015-05-08 9:42 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-05-08 10:02 ` Luke Gorrie
2015-05-08 14:44 ` Wiles, Keith
2015-05-08 16:16 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-05-08 10:26 ` Hobywan Kenoby
2015-05-08 13:31 ` Neil Horman
2015-05-08 16:22 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-05-07 15:34 ` Luke Gorrie
2015-05-08 4:31 ` Wiles, Keith
2015-04-24 7:47 ` Luke Gorrie
2015-04-24 15:29 ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2015-04-24 17:00 ` Neil Horman
2015-04-26 9:07 ` Luke Gorrie
2015-04-24 17:39 ` Jay Rolette
2015-04-24 17:51 ` Matthew Hall
2015-04-25 13:30 ` Marc Sune
2015-04-25 16:08 ` Wiles, Keith
2015-04-26 21:56 ` Neil Horman
2015-04-27 2:29 ` Jim Thompson
2015-04-27 13:07 ` Neil Horman
2015-04-27 16:07 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-04-28 7:20 ` Dor Laor
[not found] ` <D162FA4E.1DED8%keith.wiles@intel.com>
2015-04-27 9:52 ` Marc Sune
2015-04-27 13:39 ` Wiles, Keith
2015-04-27 15:34 ` Marc Sune
2015-04-27 10:29 ` Neil Horman
2015-04-27 13:50 ` Wiles, Keith
2015-04-27 15:23 ` Neil Horman
2015-04-27 12:38 ` Dave Neary
2015-04-27 13:41 ` Neil Horman
2015-04-27 16:09 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-04-24 18:12 ` Matt Laswell
2015-04-24 18:51 ` Neil Horman
2015-04-24 19:55 ` Jay Rolette
2015-04-25 12:10 ` Neil Horman
2015-04-27 13:46 ` Jay Rolette
2015-04-28 17:26 ` Neil Horman
2015-04-28 20:02 ` Jay Rolette
2015-04-28 6:22 ` Matthew Hall
2015-04-28 17:48 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D1680195.1E739%keith.wiles@intel.com \
--to=keith.wiles@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).