From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A71BCD1E for ; Fri, 1 May 2015 19:45:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 May 2015 10:45:28 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,351,1427785200"; d="scan'208";a="688627171" Received: from orsmsx107.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.240.5]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 May 2015 10:45:28 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx114.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.8) by ORSMSX107.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.240.5) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Fri, 1 May 2015 10:45:28 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx113.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.13.26]) by FMSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.116.8]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Fri, 1 May 2015 10:45:28 -0700 From: "Wiles, Keith" To: Matthew Hall , Neil Horman Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] GitHub sandbox for the DPDK community Thread-Index: AQHQhCdlg1RCyqklQ0KpSAVz9bdNYJ1nyWwAgAAM1QD//7AtAA== Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 17:45:27 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20150501164512.GB27756@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> <20150501173108.GA24714@mhcomputing.net> In-Reply-To: <20150501173108.GA24714@mhcomputing.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.252.204.210] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <42D5124F0CE0724996259A6FC298B730@intel.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] GitHub sandbox for the DPDK community X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 17:45:51 -0000 On 5/1/15, 12:31 PM, "Matthew Hall" wrote: >Normally I'm a big command-line supporter. However I have found reviewing >patches by email for me is about the most painful workflow. > >The emails are pages and pages. > >The replies from commenters are buried in the walls of text. > >Replies to replies keep shifting farther off the edge of the screen. The >code=20 >gets weirder and weirder to try to read. > >Quickly reading over the patchset by scrolling through to get the flavor >of=20 >it, to see if I'm qualified to review it, and look at the parts I >actually=20 >know about is much harder. > >I can go to one place to see every candidate patchset out there, the GH >Pull=20 >Request page. Then I can just sync up the branch and test it on my own >systems=20 >to see if it works, not just try to read it. > >Github automatically minimizes old comments that are already fixed, so >they=20 >don't keep consuming space and mental bandwidth from the review. > >All in all, I'd be able to review more DPDK patches faster with the GH >interface than having them in the mailing list. +1 and very well stated. > >Matthew. >