From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0053.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.53]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0432B8D9D for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 20:57:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from SN2PR0601MB1007.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.160.59.154) by SN2PR0601MB1007.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.160.59.154) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.293.16; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 18:57:30 +0000 Received: from SN2PR0601MB1007.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.59.154]) by SN2PR0601MB1007.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.59.154]) with mapi id 15.01.0293.007; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 18:57:30 +0000 From: Alex Forster To: "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: Question about unsupported transceivers Thread-Index: AQHRBdurwfMhGdCgNkG1Uobt5eIVL55pgz0A Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 18:57:29 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=alex@alexforster.com; x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-originating-ip: [173.161.199.53] x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; SN2PR0601MB1007; 5:/0MDm4uY5LtqbCAkoNlMv1xlhFmmPiru5ONzhvXTiShs7c7eTtloIXopD763UPD1jRTdgDBA7h4uLMAehQSzbGNtPFy3alpEFKthsKgdP5h73JubinC7g5xK3PfUGZNboa6mY7f/BMLyCzB1hpnPYQ==; 24:NplR8Njdc3ZjlYu1ZB6S9ncH/JxH4Xgfbfw7HFX/hzGK54T0cT9nzXQGz6F0fAXgA1Z4kfRazeaUFQPhpPmxOc1SQhVKMYFfsGc0dFPw/xw=; 20:SsmgUiH52cg4ERVoiNIJfiqxtjmJ1ZRDMifmUq11whN4DsqPsTWMOcMUSPu4r1BPxNn3L8d2ML3/qeR79JMLAg== x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:SN2PR0601MB1007; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(520078)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001); SRVR:SN2PR0601MB1007; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:SN2PR0601MB1007; x-forefront-prvs: 07283408BE x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(189002)(199003)(15975445007)(189998001)(2900100001)(40100003)(77096005)(97736004)(66066001)(5002640100001)(81156007)(64706001)(122556002)(102836002)(2950100001)(92566002)(36756003)(10400500002)(5004730100002)(2501003)(5008740100001)(5007970100001)(86362001)(2351001)(46102003)(76176999)(101416001)(5001960100002)(106116001)(16236675004)(105586002)(110136002)(99286002)(50986999)(107886002)(54356999)(87936001)(11100500001)(450100001)(106356001)(19580395003)(94096001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:SN2PR0601MB1007; H:SN2PR0601MB1007.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:3; A:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: alexforster.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: alexforster.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Oct 2015 18:57:29.8804 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 8fb42f39-75d5-4c92-b720-fa47f1ea1e7a X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN2PR0601MB1007 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Question about unsupported transceivers X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 18:57:35 -0000 I believe I've discovered my problem: https://gist.github.com/AlexForster/0= fb4699bcdf196cf5462 As mentioned previously, I have two X520-Q1 cards installed. It appears tha= t initialization of the first card obeys allow_unsupported_sfp=3D1, but ini= tialization of the second card does not. Is this a bug, or is there a way to work around this that I'm not aware of? Alex Forster