From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E22CD5398 for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2018 02:30:31 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Oct 2018 17:30:30 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,329,1534834800"; d="scan'208";a="91275103" Received: from fmsmsx108.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.206]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Oct 2018 17:30:30 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx116.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.20) by FMSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.206) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 17:30:30 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx151.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.7.87]) by fmsmsx116.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.92]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 17:30:30 -0700 From: "Wang, Yipeng1" To: Honnappa Nagarahalli , "Richardson, Bruce" , "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" CC: "dev@dpdk.org" , "honnappa.nagarahalli@dpdk.org" , "Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)" , Steve Capper , Ola Liljedahl , nd , "Gobriel, Sameh" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Address reader-writer concurrency in rte_hash Thread-Index: AQHURgTuMbp3QXuwrESo2qvnFE2pcaUE6Y7ggAHfWQCABHZaYA== Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 00:30:29 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1536253938-192391-1-git-send-email-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.0.400.15 dlp-reaction: no-action x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiYzIwMjk5MTMtZjE0Mi00Yjg3LWFjNjAtNTJlNTA4NzgyMjgzIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjEwLjE4MDQuNDkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoiMWh1dXpUNE51R0M2RloxZzVOcUZYeTMxZzFSVlwvamNHZzJ2and2dW14XC9Dc2J5UHgwc0VZQUQzNXpBbkE0SExKIn0= x-originating-ip: [10.1.200.107] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Address reader-writer concurrency in rte_hash X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2018 00:30:32 -0000 >> >> Another comment is as you know we also have a new extension to rte_hash >> to enable extendable buckets and partial-key hashing. Thanks for the >> comments btw. Could you check if your lockless scheme also applies to >> those extensions? >Thank you for reminding me on this. I thought I had covered everything. On= a relook, I have missed few key issues. I will reply on the >other email thread. [Wang, Yipeng] Hi, Honnappa, would like to rebase your V2 on the V4 patch I= submitted for the ext table and partial-key hashing (http://patchwork.dpdk= .org/cover/45620/). I will have V5 sent soon, so if it is in time, please r= ebase on V5. If you have any difficulty to do so we can work together on re= solving the conflicts. Let's resolve the conflicts so that the final merge = would be easier.