Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 3/3] test/hash: add readwrite test for ext table

["Wang, Yipeng1" <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>]

Thanks for the comment Bruce,

I agree with you.  As I think about it, I believe the old scaling test can be removed since currently the
multiwriter is supported inside the library, and we already have the multiwriter test.

I will post a V2 version of this patch series to remove that test.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Richardson, Bruce
>Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 1:37 PM
>To: Wang, Yipeng1 <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>
>Cc: stephen@networkplumber.org; dev@dpdk.org; honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com; Gobriel, Sameh <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] test/hash: add readwrite test for ext table
>
>On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 02:48:05PM -0700, Yipeng Wang wrote:
>> This commit improves the readwrite test to consider extendable table
>> feature and add more functional tests to cover more corner cases.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang@intel.com> ---
>> test/test/test_hash_readwrite.c | 70
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 58
>> insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>With the extension of this test case, and the addition of other test cases
>by Honnappa in the other patch sets in this release, we are building up
>quite a large set of hash table autotests, some of whose meaning and use is
>a bit obscure. Are there any hash tests that you feel could be removed at
>this point, to simplify things?
>
>/Bruce