DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Gobriel, Sameh" <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"Medvedkin, Vladimir" <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Wang, Yipeng1" <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>,
	"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	"De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>,
	"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] maintainers: claim maintainership of Toeplitz hash
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 21:32:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <D6455DCED8CA9B4B940598A7ACF7B9FDB50256E4@ORSMSX113.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8657694.f1liP514bC@xps>

I agree with Thomas. It makes sense to separate out hash function from hash table implementation. 

Sameh

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net] 
Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2019 1:25 PM
To: Medvedkin, Vladimir <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Wang, Yipeng1 <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>; Gobriel, Sameh <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] maintainers: claim maintainership of Toeplitz hash

07/02/2019 20:28, Medvedkin, Vladimir:
> On 06/02/2019 10:38, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 05/02/2019 14:57, Vladimir Medvedkin:
> >> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> >> +M: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
> >> +F: lib/librte_hash/rte_thash.h
> > I'm not sure about adding maintainership for one file.
> > You are the author of this file, so you should be consulted during 
> > reviews if you don't catch them by yourself.
> > But I prefer seeing maintainers as taking charge and understanding 
> > of a full library as a block.
> >
> > And unfortunately, it does not work with the script:
> > 	devtools/get-maintainer.sh lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h You 
> > would appear as maintainer for all hash files.
> 
> It could be solved by adding header.
> 
> In fact thash is not used by other parts of the hash library (instead 
> it could be used by softnic for example).
> 
>  From my point of view, hash library consists of two parts, hash table 
> itself and a number of hash functions. Hash functions, in turn, can be 
> used for many other purposes, not just for a hash table. Maybe we 
> should separate hash functions and hash table? And if you think it is 
> a bad idea, so be it, 4 maintainers for hash is enough.

I don't know.
It's opening the door for more split of maintainers areas.
I would like to get more opinions from other maintainers, please.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-07 21:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-03 16:34 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim co-maintainership of LPM Vladimir Medvedkin
2019-02-03 16:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim maintainership of Toeplitz hash Vladimir Medvedkin
2019-02-05 13:57   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Vladimir Medvedkin
2019-02-06 10:38     ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-02-07 19:28       ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-02-07 21:24         ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-02-07 21:32           ` Gobriel, Sameh [this message]
2019-02-07 23:13             ` Wang, Yipeng1
2019-02-08 11:34               ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-02-03 16:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] rte_thash: replace license text with SPDX tag Vladimir Medvedkin
2019-02-05 13:57   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Vladimir Medvedkin
2019-02-06 10:45     ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-02-04  9:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim co-maintainership of LPM Bruce Richardson
2019-02-05 13:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Vladimir Medvedkin
2019-02-06 10:41   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=D6455DCED8CA9B4B940598A7ACF7B9FDB50256E4@ORSMSX113.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=sameh.gobriel@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com \
    --cc=yipeng1.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).